BACKGROUND: Studies using clinical measures to track AD progression often assume linear declines over the entire course of the disease, which may not be justified. The objective of this study was to model change in measures of the clinical severity of Alzheimer's disease (AD) over time. METHODS: We developed a method to apply growth curve models to prospective data and characterize AD patients' functional change over time. Data from the modified Mini-Mental State Examination (mMMSE) and measures of basic and instrumental ADL, administered semiannually for up to 5 years to 236 patients with probable AD, were modeled. RESULTS: The rate of decline in mMMS scores per 6-month interval gradually increased as scores dropped from the maximum of 57 to 20. The rate of decline then decreased as scores approached 0, resulting in an inverse "S" curve. The rate of increase in instrumental ADL scores per interval attenuated as the scores increased, while that for basic ADL scores across intervals was constant. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the pattern of progression of the three measures is in part a function of their psychometric properties. The progression curves may also reflect content-specific features of the instruments. Superimposition of the modeled decline in these three content areas suggests a hypothetical model of the relative timing of cognitive and functional changes in AD.
BACKGROUND: Studies using clinical measures to track AD progression often assume linear declines over the entire course of the disease, which may not be justified. The objective of this study was to model change in measures of the clinical severity of Alzheimer's disease (AD) over time. METHODS: We developed a method to apply growth curve models to prospective data and characterize ADpatients' functional change over time. Data from the modified Mini-Mental State Examination (mMMSE) and measures of basic and instrumental ADL, administered semiannually for up to 5 years to 236 patients with probable AD, were modeled. RESULTS: The rate of decline in mMMS scores per 6-month interval gradually increased as scores dropped from the maximum of 57 to 20. The rate of decline then decreased as scores approached 0, resulting in an inverse "S" curve. The rate of increase in instrumental ADL scores per interval attenuated as the scores increased, while that for basic ADL scores across intervals was constant. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the pattern of progression of the three measures is in part a function of their psychometric properties. The progression curves may also reflect content-specific features of the instruments. Superimposition of the modeled decline in these three content areas suggests a hypothetical model of the relative timing of cognitive and functional changes in AD.
Authors: Eric Stallard; Bruce Kinosian; Arthur S Zbrozek; Anatoliy I Yashin; Henry A Glick; Yaakov Stern Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Mert R Sabuncu; Rahul S Desikan; Jorge Sepulcre; Boon Thye T Yeo; Hesheng Liu; Nicholas J Schmansky; Martin Reuter; Michael W Weiner; Randy L Buckner; Reisa A Sperling; Bruce Fischl Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2011-08
Authors: Rochelle E Tractenberg; Paul S Aisen; Myron F Weiner; Jeffrey L Cummings; Gregory R Hancock Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Carolyn W Zhu; Christopher Leibman; Trent McLaughlin; Nikolaos Scarmeas; Marilyn Albert; Jason Brandt; Deborah Blacker; Mary Sano; Yaakov Stern Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Qolamreza R Razlighi; Eric Stallard; Jason Brandt; Deborah Blacker; Marilyn Albert; Nikolaos Scarmeas; Bruce Kinosian; Anatoliy I Yashin; Yaakov Stern Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Adam M Brickman; Lawrence S Honig; Nikolaos Scarmeas; Oksana Tatarina; Linda Sanders; Marilyn S Albert; Jason Brandt; Deborah Blacker; Yaakov Stern Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-09