Literature DB >> 11792029

Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.

P Yu1, M Ouaknine, J Revis, A Giovanni.   

Abstract

The purpose was to determine the clinical value of a multiparametric objective voice evaluation protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic parameters measured mainly on a sustained /a/. This was done by comparison with perceptual analysis of continuous speech by a jury composed of 6 experienced listeners. Voice samples (continuous speech) from 63 male patients with dysphonia and 21 control subjects with normal voices were recorded and assesed by a jury of listeners. The jury was instructed to classify voice samples according to the G (overall dysphonia) component of the GRBAS score on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 for normal to 3 for severe dysphonia. Objective parameters were recorded on an EVA workstation. As usual with this type of system, parameters were measured mainly on a sustained /a/. Measured parameters included fundamental frequency (F0), intensity, jitter, shimmer, signal-to-noise ratio, Lyapunov coefficient (LC), oral airflow (OAF), maximum phonatory time (MPT), and vocal range (range). Estimated subglottic pressure (ESGP) was determined on a series of /pa/. Discriminant analysis was performed to detect correlation between jury classification and combinations of parameters. Results showed that a nonlinear combination of only six parameters (range, LC, ESGP, MPT, signal-to-noise ratio, and F0) allowed 86% concordance with jury classification. Discussion deals with the relative importance of the different objective parameters for discriminant analysis. Special emphasis is placed on two measurements rarely made in routine clinical workup, i.e., estimated subglottic pressure and Lyapunov coefficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11792029     DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(01)00053-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  22 in total

1.  Objective methods of sample selection in acoustic analysis of voice.

Authors:  Aleksandra E Olszewski; Lisa Shen; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Assessment of effectiveness of acoustic analysis of voice for monitoring the evolution of vocal nodules after vocal treatment.

Authors:  Wasim Elhendi Halawa; Antonio Rodríguez Fernández Freire; Irene Vázquez Muñoz; Sofía Santos Pérez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The effect of segment selection on acoustic analysis.

Authors:  Seong Hee Choi; Jiyeoun Lee; Alicia J Sprecher; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Aerodynamic findings and Voice Handicap Index in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sergio Motta; Ugo Cesari; Mariano Paternoster; Giovanni Motta; Giuseppe Orefice
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Clinical value of acoustic voice measures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Katrin Werth; Daniel Voigt; Michael Döllinger; Ulrich Eysholdt; Jörg Lohscheller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Objective measurement of real time subglottic pressure during medialization thyroplasty: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Nayla Matar; Marc Remacle; Vincent Bachy; Georges Lawson; Antoine Giovanni; Vinciane Lejoly-Devuyst; Thierry Legou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Classification of glottic insufficiency and tension asymmetry using a multilayer perceptron.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Ketan Surender; Erin E Devine; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Relevance of subglottic pressure in normal and dysphonic subjects.

Authors:  K Ketelslagers; M S De Bodt; F L Wuyts; P Van de Heyning
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.236

9.  Robustness of auditory Teager Energy Cepstrum Coefficients for classification of pathological and normal voices in noisy environments.

Authors:  Lotfi Salhi; Adnane Cherif
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-05-28

10.  A preliminary study on improving the recognition of esophageal speech using a hybrid system based on statistical voice conversion.

Authors:  Othman Lachhab; Joseph Di Martino; Elhassane Ibn Elhaj; Ahmed Hammouch
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.