Literature DB >> 7474970

Pathologic voice type and the acoustic prediction of severity.

D Martin1, J Fitch, V Wolfe.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that acoustic measures would predict dysphonic severity with differential results for pathological voice types. An instructional program based upon synthesized voice signals was developed to facilitate an awareness of prototypical voice types. Eighty phonatory samples representing normal subjects as well as patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis, vocal nodules, and functional dysphonia were analyzed acoustically on the basis of four measures: average fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer, and harmonic/noise ratio (H/N ratio). Following training, 29 listeners classified 62% of the phonatory samples on the basis of breathy, hoarse, rough, and normal. Dysphonic severity of rough voices was predicted more successfully by H/N ratio (r2 = .73) than by shimmer (r2 = .43). Dysphonic severity of breathy voices was predicted only by the combined features of less jitter, more shimmer, and lower H/N ratio (r2 = .74). No combination of acoustic variables was successful in the prediction of the hoarse voice type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7474970     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3804.765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  12 in total

1.  Assessment of effectiveness of acoustic analysis of voice for monitoring the evolution of vocal nodules after vocal treatment.

Authors:  Wasim Elhendi Halawa; Antonio Rodríguez Fernández Freire; Irene Vázquez Muñoz; Sofía Santos Pérez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Identifying a comparison for matching rough voice quality.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Clinical value of acoustic voice measures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Katrin Werth; Daniel Voigt; Michael Döllinger; Ulrich Eysholdt; Jörg Lohscheller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A model for the prediction of breathiness in vowels.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; Arturo Camacho; Sona Patel; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Modeling of Breathy Voice Quality Using Pitch-strength Estimates.

Authors:  David A Eddins; Supraja Anand; Arturo Camacho; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  A computational model to predict changes in breathiness resulting from variations in aspiration noise level.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; Arturo Camacho
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Relation of perceived breathiness to laryngeal kinematics and acoustic measures based on computational modeling.

Authors:  Robin A Samlan; Brad H Story; Kate Bunton
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Examining Relationships Between GRBAS Ratings and Acoustic, Aerodynamic and Patient-Reported Voice Measures in Adults With Voice Disorders.

Authors:  Robert Brinton Fujiki; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Effect of subthalamic stimulation on voice and speech in Parkinson's disease: for the better or worse?

Authors:  Sabine Skodda; Wenke Grönheit; Uwe Schlegel; Martin Südmeyer; Alfons Schnitzler; Lars Wojtecki
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Progression of voice and speech impairment in the course of Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  S Skodda; W Grönheit; N Mancinelli; U Schlegel
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2013-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.