Literature DB >> 24061531

Transperineal biopsy of the prostate--is this the future?

Dwayne T S Chang1, Benjamin Challacombe, Nathan Lawrentschuk.   

Abstract

Transperineal prostate biopsy is re-emerging after decades of being an underused alternative to transrectal biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Factors driving this change include possible improved cancer detection rates, improved sampling of the anteroapical regions of the prostate, a reduced risk of false negative results and a reduced risk of underestimating disease volume and grade. The increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance and patients with diabetes mellitus who are at high risk of sepsis also favours transperineal biopsy as a sterile alternative to standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Factors limiting its use include increased time, training and financial constraints as well as the need for high-grade anaesthesia. Furthermore, the necessary equipment for transperineal biopsy is not widely available. However, the expansion of transperineal biopsy has been propagated by the increase in multiparametric MRI-guided biopsies, which often use the transperineal approach. Used with MRI imaging, transperineal biopsy has led to improvements in cancer detection rates, more-accurate grading of cancer severity and reduced risk of diagnosing clinically insignificant disease. Targeted biopsy under MRI guidance can reduce the number of cores required, reducing the risk of complications from needle biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24061531     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  109 in total

1.  Robotic transperineal prostate biopsy: pilot clinical study.

Authors:  H Ho; J S P Yuen; P Mohan; E W Lim; C W S Cheng
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy as a staging procedure to select patients best suited for active surveillance.

Authors:  Al V Taira; Gregory S Merrick; Abbey Bennett; Hugo Andreini; Walter Taubenslag; Robert W Galbreath; Wayne M Butler; Nathan Bittner; Edward Adamovich
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy.

Authors:  A Takenaka; R Hara; T Ishimura; T Fujii; Y Jo; A Nagai; M Fujisawa
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 5.554

4.  A prospective study on patient's erectile function following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Fabrizio Palumbo; Carlo Bettocchi; Marco Spilotros; Antonio Vavallo; Silvano Palazzo; Pasquale Ditonno; Pasquale Martino; Michele Battaglia; Francesco Paolo Selvaggi
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2010-12

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter A Pinto; Paul H Chung; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Jochen Kruecker; Compton J Benjamin; Sheng Xu; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Celene Chua; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna H Shih; Stacey P Gates; Carey Buckner; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Combined multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading.

Authors:  Adil Ouzzane; Philippe Puech; Laurent Lemaitre; Xavier Leroy; Pierre Nevoux; Nacim Betrouni; Georges-Pascal Haber; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Transperineal extended biopsy improves the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate: a comparative study of 6 and 12 biopsy cores.

Authors:  Atsushi Takenaka; Ryouei Hara; Yoji Hyodo; Takeshi Ishimura; Yutaka Sakai; Hitoshi Fujioka; Tomohiro Fujii; Yoshimasa Jo; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.369

8.  Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis.

Authors:  M E Chen; P Troncoso; D A Johnston; K Tang; R J Babaian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Transperineal 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate: an essential tool in selecting patients for focal prostate cancer therapy.

Authors:  Gary Onik; Winston Barzell
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  Diagnostic yield of repeated transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies stratified by specific histopathologic diagnoses and prostate specific antigen levels.

Authors:  C G Roehrborn; G J Pickens; J S Sanders
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  36 in total

1.  Identifying prostate cancer and its clinical risk in asymptomatic men using machine learning of high dimensional peripheral blood flow cytometric natural killer cell subset phenotyping data.

Authors:  Simon P Hood; Georgina Cosma; A Graham Pockley; Gemma A Foulds; Catherine Johnson; Stephen Reeder; Stéphanie E McArdle; Masood A Khan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: single-center experience in China.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Wei Wang; Rong Yang; Gutian Zhang; Bing Zhang; Weiping Li; Haifeng Huang; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Planning for the post-antibiotic era - why we must avoid TRUS-guided biopsy sampling.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Jeremy P Grummet
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Advantages of single-puncture transperineal saturation biopsy of prostate: analysis of outcomes in 125 patients using our scheme.

Authors:  Eugenio Martorana; Salvatore Micali; Ahmed Ghaith; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Riccardo Galli; Maurizio Paterlini; Giampaolo Bianchi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Handling and reporting of transperineal template prostate biopsy in Europe: a web-based survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP).

Authors:  Solene-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet; Eva Compérat; Lars Egevad; Ondra Hes; Jon Oxley; Murali Varma; Glen Kristiansen; Daniel M Berney
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Infectious complications of prostate biopsy: winning battles but not war.

Authors:  Okan Derin; Limírio Fonseca; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Investigating the ability of multiparametric MRI to exclude significant prostate cancer prior to transperineal biopsy.

Authors:  Eva M Serrao; Tristan Barrett; Karan Wadhwa; Deepak Parashar; Julia Frey; Brendan C Koo; Anne Y Warren; Andrew Doble; Christof Kastner; Ferdia A Gallagher
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Erik Velez; Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Olutayo Olubiyi; Christopher B Allard; Adam S Kibel; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

9.  TRUS-guided transperineal prostate 12+X core biopsy with template for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gang Guo; Yong Xu; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Prostate cancer: performance characteristics of combined T₂W and DW-MRI scoring in the setting of template transperineal re-biopsy using MR-TRUS fusion.

Authors:  Edward M Lawrence; Sarah Y W Tang; Tristan Barrett; Brendan Koo; Debra A Goldman; Anne Y Warren; Richard G Axell; Andrew Doble; Ferdia A Gallagher; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Christof Kastner; Evis Sala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.