Literature DB >> 22307210

Transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy as a staging procedure to select patients best suited for active surveillance.

Al V Taira1, Gregory S Merrick, Abbey Bennett, Hugo Andreini, Walter Taubenslag, Robert W Galbreath, Wayne M Butler, Nathan Bittner, Edward Adamovich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients with clinically insignificant prostate cancer are candidates for active surveillance. However, uncertainty regarding the true extent of disease limits enthusiasm. In this study, we report our initial findings in patients with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-detected clinically insignificant prostate cancer undergoing transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) as a staging procedure.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients who met the Epstein criteria for clinically insignificant prostate cancer underwent TTMB. Each biopsy core position was recorded in 3 dimensions with documentation of location of each positive biopsy core, Gleason score, percentage of involvement of each core, and presence/absence of perineural invasion.
RESULTS: Mean pre-TRUS prostate specific antigen was 4.7 ng/mL with a Gleason score of 6 involving a median of 5% of 1 TRUS core. The mean number of TTMB biopsy cores was 58.5, with 6.6 cores positive for malignancy. Ten patients had clinically insignificant prostate cancer (15.7%), 8 had no TTMB-detected cancer (12.5%), and 46 (71.9%) had clinically significant cancer. Of patients with cancer, 37 (66.1%) had bilobar involvement and 25 (44.6%) harbored a Gleason score of ≥7. In a multivariate analysis, tobacco consumption was found to be most closely related to clinically significant disease on TTMB.
CONCLUSIONS: TRUS biopsy underestimates disease extent and Gleason score in some patients. TTMB provides a more accurate assessment of the presence of aggressive histology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22307210     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31823fe639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  14 in total

1.  Validation of revised Epstein's criteria for insignificant prostate cancer prediction in a Greek subpopulation.

Authors:  Κ Chondros; Ν Karpathakis; Ι Heretis; Ε Mavromanolakis; N Chondros; F Sofras; C Mamoulakis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 2.  Transperineal biopsy of the prostate--is this the future?

Authors:  Dwayne T S Chang; Benjamin Challacombe; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Frank-Jan H Drost; Daniël F Osses; Daan Nieboer; Ewout W Steyerberg; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol; Ivo G Schoots
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-25

4.  Handling and reporting of transperineal template prostate biopsy in Europe: a web-based survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP).

Authors:  Solene-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet; Eva Compérat; Lars Egevad; Ondra Hes; Jon Oxley; Murali Varma; Glen Kristiansen; Daniel M Berney
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Erik Velez; Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Olutayo Olubiyi; Christopher B Allard; Adam S Kibel; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

6.  Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Jeffrey Weinreb; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Geert Villeirs; Baris Turkbey; Jelle Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Transperineal prostate biopsy: The modern gold standard to prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Gernot Ortner; Eirini Tzanaki; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Udo Nagele; Theodoros Tokas
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09

8.  PROMIS--Prostate MR imaging study: A paired validating cohort study evaluating the role of multi-parametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A El-Shater Bosaily; C Parker; L C Brown; R Gabe; R G Hindley; R Kaplan; M Emberton; H U Ahmed
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Gleason score and tumor laterality in radical prostatectomy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a comparative study.

Authors:  Renan A Pereira; Roberto S Costa; Valdair F Muglia; Fábio Franca Silva; Joyce S Lajes; Rodolfo B Dos Reis; Gyl Eb Silva
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Visually Estimated MRI Targeted Prostate Biopsy Could Improve the Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with a PSA Level <10 ng/mL.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Lee; Jong Kil Nam; Sung Woo Park; Seung Soo Lee; Ji-Yeon Han; Sang Don Lee; Joon Woo Lee; Moon Kee Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.