| Literature DB >> 24058500 |
Jing Meng1, Zixiang Xu, Jing Guo, Yunxia Yue, Xiao Sun.
Abstract
Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are a class of ideal technologies that function via anaerobic respiration of electricigens, which bring current generation and environmental restoration together. An in-depth understanding of microbial metabolism is of great importance in engineering microbes to further improve their respiration. We employed flux balance analysis and selected Fe(iii) as a substitute for the electrode to simulate current-generating metabolism of Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA with a fixed acetate uptake rate. Simulation results indicated the fluxes of reactions directing acetate towards dissimilation to generate electrons increased under the suboptimal growth condition, resulting in an increase in the respiration rate and a decrease in the growth rate. The results revealed the competitive relationship between oxidative respiration and cell growth during the metabolism of microbe current generation. The results helped us quantitatively understand why microbes growing slowly have the potential to make good use of fuel in MFCs. At the same time, slow growth does not necessarily result in speedy respiration. Alternative respirations may exist under the same growth state due to redundant pathways in the metabolic network. The big difference between the maximum and minimum respiration mainly results from the total formate secretion. With iterative flux variability analysis, a relatively ideal model of variant of G. sulfurreducens PCA was reconstructed by deleting several enzymes in the wild model, which could reach simultaneous suboptimal growth and maximum respiration. Under this ideal condition, flux towards extracellular electron transfer rather than for biosynthesis is beneficial for the conversion of organic matter to electricity without large accumulations of biomass and electricigens may maximize utilization of limited fuel. Our simulations will provide an insight into the enhanced current-generating mechanism and identify theoretical range of respiration rates for guiding strain improvement in MFCs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24058500 PMCID: PMC3773087 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Central metabolism of and simulation results of optimal and suboptimal growth.
Red values for optimal and blue values for suboptimal growth.
Predicted the entire range of respiratory rates of G. sulfurreducensduring in silico optimal and suboptimal growth with acetate uptake rate at 13.630mmol/g.dw/h.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| minimum | maximum | |
| 0.060 | 98.447 | 98.582 |
| 0.054 | 94.633 | 99.603 |
| 0.048 | 90.576 | 100.651 |
| 0.042 | 86.519 | 101.700 |
| 0.036 | 82.462 | 102.749 |
| 0.030 | 78.405 | 103.797 |
| 0.024 | 74.348 | 104.846 |
| 0.018 | 70.291 | 105.894 |
| 0.012 | 66.234 | 106.943 |
| 0.006 | 62.177 | 107.991 |
| 0.000 | 58.120 | 109.040 |
Figure 2Alternative flux distributions through central metabolism of during in silico growth at suboptimal growth of 0.006h-1.
Predicted flux distributions through central metabolism in during in silico suboptimal growth. Red values indicated the flux distribution corresponding to in silico minimum respiration at the rate of 62.177mmol/g.dw/h, and blue values corresponded to in silico maximum respiration at the rate of 107.991 mmol/g.dw/h. Alternative respiration was simulated by constraining the growth rate at 0.006h-1and maximizing/minimizing the respiration rate.
Predicted the entire range of respiratory rate of variants of during in silico suboptimal growth of 0.006h-1 with acetate uptake rate at 13.630mmol/g.dw/h.
| Reactions (Enzymes) knockout |
| |
|---|---|---|
| minimum | maximum | |
| FORt2 | 75.267 | 107.991 |
| FORt2+ PYRt2 | 75.652 | 107.991 |
| FORt2+ PYRt2+ VALt6 | 76.754 | 107.991 |
| FORt2+ PYRt2+ VALt6+ LEUabc | 86.290 | 107.991 |
| FORt2+ PYRt2+ VALt6+ LEUabc+ CITt6 | 86.516 | 107.991 |
| FORt2+ PYRt2+ VALt6+ LEUabc+ CITt6+ILEabc | 87.561 | 107.991 |
| FORt2+ PYRt2+ VALt6+ LEUabc+ CITt6+ILEabc + PROt5 | 89.127 | 107.991 |
| FORt2+ PYRt2+ VALt6+ LEUabc+ CITt6+ILEabc + PROt5+ LYSt3 | 97.141 | 107.991 |
| FORt2+ PYRt2+ VALt6+ LEUabc+ CITt6+ILEabc + PROt5+ LYSt3+CYSabc | 107.828 | 107.991 |
| FORt2+ PYRt2+ VALt6+ LEUabc+ CITt6+ILEabc + PROt5+ LYSt3+CYSabc+ N2t+ H2td | 107.991 | 107.991 |
Figure 3Flux distributions through central metabolism of a relatively ideal variant model of during in silico growth at suboptimal growth of 0.006h-1.
Predicted flux distributions through central metabolism in the ideal variant of during in silico growth. Red values indicated the flux distribution corresponding to in silico minimum energy synthesis at the rate of 0.990 mmol/g.dw/h, and blue values corresponded to in silico maximum energy synthesis at the rate of 8.640 mmol/g.dw/h. Alternative energy synthesis was simulated by constraining the growth rate at 0.006 h-1 and maximizing/minimizing the energy synthesis rate.
Predicted the entire flux range through ATP synthetic reaction of a ideal variant of corresponding to different in silico growth with acetate uptake rate at 13.630mmol/g.dw/h.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| minimum | maximum | |
| 0.060 | 5.850 | 5.967 |
| 0.054 | 5.310 | 6.264 |
| 0.048 | 4.770 | 6.561 |
| 0.042 | 4.230 | 6.858 |
| 0.036 | 3.690 | 7.155 |
| 0.030 | 3.150 | 7.452 |
| 0.024 | 2.610 | 7.749 |
| 0.018 | 2.070 | 8.046 |
| 0.012 | 1.530 | 8.343 |
| 0.006 | 0.990 | 8.640 |
| 0.000 | 0.450 | 8.640 |