OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of drilling speed on early bone healing in dog tibiae. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-six implants (4.0-mm diameter × 10-mm length) were placed in the proximal tibiae of 6 beagles with drilling speeds of 100, 500, and 1000 rpm, and insertion torque was recorded. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant increase from 1 to 3 weeks was observed for all groups for BIC, whereas no significant differences between 1 and 3 weeks were detected for the 100- and 500-rpm groups for BAFO (P > .34 and P > .46, respectively). A significant difference from 1 to 3 weeks was observed for the 1000-rpm group (P < .03). The 100- and 500-rpm groups presented significantly higher BAFO than the 1000-rpm group at 1 week (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Drilling speed is one of the decisive factors for early osseointegration, and overall, drilling at 1000 rpm seemed to yield the strongest biologic responses.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of drilling speed on early bone healing in dog tibiae. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-six implants (4.0-mm diameter × 10-mm length) were placed in the proximal tibiae of 6 beagles with drilling speeds of 100, 500, and 1000 rpm, and insertion torque was recorded. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant increase from 1 to 3 weeks was observed for all groups for BIC, whereas no significant differences between 1 and 3 weeks were detected for the 100- and 500-rpm groups for BAFO (P > .34 and P > .46, respectively). A significant difference from 1 to 3 weeks was observed for the 1000-rpm group (P < .03). The 100- and 500-rpm groups presented significantly higher BAFO than the 1000-rpm group at 1 week (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Drilling speed is one of the decisive factors for early osseointegration, and overall, drilling at 1000 rpm seemed to yield the strongest biologic responses.
Authors: Ashkan Rashad; Stefan Schwan; Alireza Nasirpour; Inge Schmitz; Henning Hanken; Reinhard E Friedrich; Martin Gosau Journal: In Vivo Date: 2021 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: R A Delgado-Ruiz; E Velasco Ortega; G E Romanos; S Gerhke; I Newen; J L Calvo-Guirado Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2017-04-22 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Christopher D Lopez; Adham M Alifarag; Andrea Torroni; Nick Tovar; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Lukasz Witek; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Paulo G Coelho Journal: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Date: 2017-01-13
Authors: Oded Bahat; Xing Yin; Stefan Holst; Ion Zabalegui; Eva Berroeta; Javier Pérez; Peter Wöhrle; Norbert Sörgel; John Brunski; Jill A Helms Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Chih-Hao Chen; Benjamin R Coyac; Masaki Arioka; Brian Leahy; U Serdar Tulu; Maziar Aghvami; Stefan Holst; Waldemar Hoffmann; Antony Quarry; Oded Bahat; Benjamin Salmon; John B Brunski; Jill A Helms Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.241