OBJECTIVE: To assess the participation of European urology residents in urological laparoscopy, their training patterns and facilities available in European Urology Departments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey, consisting of 23 questions concerning laparoscopic training, was published online as well as distributed on paper, during the Annual European Association of Urology Congress in 2012. Exposure to laparoscopic procedures, acquired laparoscopic experience, training patterns, training facilities and motivation were evaluated. Data was analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In all, 219 European urology residents answered the survey. Conventional laparoscopy was available in 74% of the respondents' departments, while robotic surgery was available in 17% of the departments. Of the respondents, 27% were first surgeons and 43% were assistants in conventional laparoscopic procedures. Only 23% of the residents rated their laparoscopic experience as at least 'satisfactory'; 32% of the residents did not attend any course or fellowship on laparoscopy. Dry laboratory was the most frequent setting for training (33%), although 42% of the respondents did not have access to any type of laparoscopic laboratory. The motivation to perform laparoscopy was rated as 'high' or 'very high' by 77% of the respondents, and 81% considered a post-residency fellowship in laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Urological laparoscopy is available in most European training institutions, with residents playing an active role in the procedure. However, most of them consider their laparoscopic experience to be poor. Moreover, the availability of training facilities and participation in laparoscopy courses and fellowships are low and should be encouraged.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the participation of European urology residents in urological laparoscopy, their training patterns and facilities available in European Urology Departments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey, consisting of 23 questions concerning laparoscopic training, was published online as well as distributed on paper, during the Annual European Association of Urology Congress in 2012. Exposure to laparoscopic procedures, acquired laparoscopic experience, training patterns, training facilities and motivation were evaluated. Data was analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In all, 219 European urology residents answered the survey. Conventional laparoscopy was available in 74% of the respondents' departments, while robotic surgery was available in 17% of the departments. Of the respondents, 27% were first surgeons and 43% were assistants in conventional laparoscopic procedures. Only 23% of the residents rated their laparoscopic experience as at least 'satisfactory'; 32% of the residents did not attend any course or fellowship on laparoscopy. Dry laboratory was the most frequent setting for training (33%), although 42% of the respondents did not have access to any type of laparoscopic laboratory. The motivation to perform laparoscopy was rated as 'high' or 'very high' by 77% of the respondents, and 81% considered a post-residency fellowship in laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Urological laparoscopy is available in most European training institutions, with residents playing an active role in the procedure. However, most of them consider their laparoscopic experience to be poor. Moreover, the availability of training facilities and participation in laparoscopy courses and fellowships are low and should be encouraged.
Authors: Diego M Carrion; Moises E Rodriguez-Socarrás; Guglielmo Mantica; Francesco Esperto; Angelika Cebulla; Diederick Duijvesz; Giulio Patruno; Juan L Vásquez; Domenico Veneziano; Jesús Díez-Sebastian; Ali S Gozen; Joan Palou; Juan Gómez Rivas Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-04-13 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: N Oker; Naif H Alotaibi; A C Reichelt; P Herman; M Bernal-Sprekelsen; Andreas E Albers Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Tiago Ribeiro de Oliveira; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Sérgio Pereira; Pedro Oliveira; Sandro Gaspar; Nuno Domingues; Tito Leitão; Artur Palmas; Tomé Lopes; Hein Van Poppel Journal: Curr Urol Date: 2019-05-10
Authors: Eliana Montanari; Richard Schwameis; Marisa Louridas; Christian Göbl; Lorenz Kuessel; Stephan Polterauer; Heinrich Husslein Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.889