Literature DB >> 27909613

The novel laparoscopic training 3D model in urology with surgical anatomic remarks: Fresh-frozen cadaveric tissue.

Emre Huri1, Mehmet Ezer1, Eddie Chan2.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery is routinely used to treat many urological conditions and it is the gold standard treatment option for many surgeries such as radical nephrectomy. Due to the difficulty of learning, laparoscopic training should start outside the operating room. Although it is a very different model of laparoscopic training; the aim of this review is to show the value of human cadaveric model for laparoscopic training and present our experience in this area. Fresh frozen cadaveric model in laparoscopic training, dry lab, cadaveric model, animal models and computer based simulators are the most commonly used models for laparoscopic training. Cadaveric models mimic the live setting better than animal models. Also, it is the best way in demonstrating important anatomic landmarks like prostate, bladder, and pelvic lymph nodes templates. However, cadaveric training is expensive, and should be used by multiple disciplines for higher efficiency. The laparosopic cadaveric training starts with didactic lectures with introduction of pelvic surgical anatomy. It is followed by hands-on dissection. A typical pelvic dissection part can be completed in 6 hours. Surgical robot and some laparoscopy platforms are equipped with 3-D vision. In recent years, we have use the stereoscopic laparoscopy system for training purposes to show exact anatomic landmarks. Cadavers are removed from their containers 3 to 5 days prior to training session to allow enough time for thawing. Intracorporeal suturing is an important part of laparoscopic training. We believe that suturing must be practiced in the dry lab, which is significantly cheaper than cadaveric models. Cadaveric training model should focus on the anatomic dissection instead. In conclusion, fresh-frozen cadaveric sample is one of the best 3D simulation models for laparoscopic training purposes. Major aim of cadaveric training is not only mimicking the surgical technique but also teaching true anatomy. Lack of availability and higher financial cost are the two setbacks for the use of cadavers. Surgeon should learn basic laparoscopic skills with box trainers prior to cadaveric skill training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cadaver; laparoscopic surgery; training

Year:  2016        PMID: 27909613      PMCID: PMC5125734          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2016.84770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  22 in total

1.  Robotic single-site kidney surgery: evaluation of second-generation instruments in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Jihad H Kaouk; Riccardo Autorino; Humberto Laydner; Shahab Hillyer; Rachid Yakoubi; Wahib Isac; Ahmad Kassab; Emad Rizkala; Robert J Stein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The animal model in advanced laparoscopy resident training.

Authors:  Marco La Torre; Carlo Caruso
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  Training of European urology residents in laparoscopy: results of a pan-European survey.

Authors:  Frederico T G Furriel; Maria P Laguna; Arnaldo J C Figueiredo; Pedro T C Nunes; Jens J Rassweiler
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Real-time cadaveric laparoscopy and laparoscopic video demonstrations in gross anatomy: an observation of impact on learning and career choice.

Authors:  Ean R Saberski; Sean B Orenstein; Dale Matheson; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 5.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen; Mona Meral Savran; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Basic laparoscopic skills training using fresh frozen cadaver: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mitesh Sharma; David Macafee; Alan F Horgan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta").

Authors:  Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.

Authors:  Borje Ljungberg; Karim Bensalah; Steven Canfield; Saeed Dabestani; Fabian Hofmann; Milan Hora; Markus A Kuczyk; Thomas Lam; Lorenzo Marconi; Axel S Merseburger; Peter Mulders; Thomas Powles; Michael Staehler; Alessandro Volpe; Axel Bex
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors--is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes?

Authors:  William C Huang; Elena B Elkin; Andrew S Levey; Thomas L Jang; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Coordinated multiple cadaver use for minimally invasive surgical training.

Authors:  Sarah D Blaschko; H Mark Brooks; S Michael Dhuy; Cynthia Charest-Shell; Ralph V Clayman; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal simple nephrectomy: The impact of etiological factors of the results of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Rauf Naghiyev; Sudeyf Imamverdiyev; Elchin Efendiyev; Öner Şanlı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-08-01

Review 2.  Animal ethics in laparoscopic urology training.

Authors:  Eymen Gazel; Ayşegül Özgök; Ahmet Murat Bayraktar; Osman Ergün; Yaşar Özgök
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

3.  Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of perioperative course and postoperative outcome after 1 year.

Authors:  Anthony Yang; Naman Barman; Edward Chin; Daniel Herron; Antonios Arvelakis; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Sander S Florman; Michael A Palese
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

Review 4.  Training in Robotic Surgery-an Overview.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Tim P Briggs; John D Kelly; Senthil Nathan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.092

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.