PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of guidewire detection in right cardiac cavities by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in order to detect catheter misplacement and to optimize central venous catheter (CVC) positioning. Ultrasonic control for catheter tip positioning was compared to that by chest X-ray (CXR). METHODS: We conducted a monocentric prospective observational study (January-November 2010). All consecutive patients undergoing CVC insertion were included. The puncture was performed using the landmark method or ultrasound guidance. TTE was performed during the procedure to follow the arrival of the guidewire in the right cardiac cavities. Catheter misplacement was defined as an aberrant position on the postprocedural CXR (catheter positioning in ipsilateral or contralateral veins). The primary endpoint was the prediction of catheter misplacement by guidewire detection in the cardiac cavities. The secondary endpoint was the optimization of the catheter tip placement in the superior vena cava. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients received 101 CVC. The guidewire was visualized in 92 cases. In five cases, the guidewire was not seen in the right cardiac cavities and CXR showed catheter misplacement. In four cases, poor echogenicity led to the ultrasound examination being abandoned. Catheter misplacement was detected by TTE with a sensitivity of 96% (CI 90-98%), a specificity of 83% (CI 44-97%), a positive predictive value of 98%, and a negative predictive value of 55%. Likelihood ratios were LR+ 5.7 (CI 0.96-34.4) and LR- 0.05 (CI 0.02-0.14). Guidewire removal under TTE avoided an excessively distal position of the catheter tip in all cases. CONCLUSION: TTE is a reliable tool to detect catheter misplacement and to optimize catheter tip positioning during the procedure of CVC insertion.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of guidewire detection in right cardiac cavities by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in order to detect catheter misplacement and to optimize central venous catheter (CVC) positioning. Ultrasonic control for catheter tip positioning was compared to that by chest X-ray (CXR). METHODS: We conducted a monocentric prospective observational study (January-November 2010). All consecutive patients undergoing CVC insertion were included. The puncture was performed using the landmark method or ultrasound guidance. TTE was performed during the procedure to follow the arrival of the guidewire in the right cardiac cavities. Catheter misplacement was defined as an aberrant position on the postprocedural CXR (catheter positioning in ipsilateral or contralateral veins). The primary endpoint was the prediction of catheter misplacement by guidewire detection in the cardiac cavities. The secondary endpoint was the optimization of the catheter tip placement in the superior vena cava. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients received 101 CVC. The guidewire was visualized in 92 cases. In five cases, the guidewire was not seen in the right cardiac cavities and CXR showed catheter misplacement. In four cases, poor echogenicity led to the ultrasound examination being abandoned. Catheter misplacement was detected by TTE with a sensitivity of 96% (CI 90-98%), a specificity of 83% (CI 44-97%), a positive predictive value of 98%, and a negative predictive value of 55%. Likelihood ratios were LR+ 5.7 (CI 0.96-34.4) and LR- 0.05 (CI 0.02-0.14). Guidewire removal under TTE avoided an excessively distal position of the catheter tip in all cases. CONCLUSION: TTE is a reliable tool to detect catheter misplacement and to optimize catheter tip positioning during the procedure of CVC insertion.
Authors: Daniele G Biasucci; Antonio La Greca; Giancarlo Scoppettuolo; Mauro Pittiruti Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Christoph F Dietrich; Rudolf Horn; Susanne Morf; Liliana Chiorean; Yi Dong; Xin-Wu Cui; Nathan S S Atkinson; Christian Jenssen Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Enyo A Ablordeppey; Anne M Drewry; Alexander B Beyer; Daniel L Theodoro; Susan A Fowler; Brian M Fuller; Christopher R Carpenter Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Mark D Weber; Thomas Conlon; Charlotte Woods-Hill; Stephanie L Watts; Eileen Nelson; Danielle Traynor; Bingqing Zhang; Daniela Davis; Adam S Himebauch Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Jasper M Smit; Reinder Raadsen; Michiel J Blans; Manfred Petjak; Peter M Van de Ven; Pieter R Tuinman Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Peter Korsten; Eirini Mavropoulou; Susanne Wienbeck; David Ellenberger; Daniel Patschan; Michael Zeisberg; Radovan Vasko; Björn Tampe; Gerhard A Müller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jean-Francois Timsit; Giuseppe Citerio; Jan Bakker; Matteo Bassetti; Dominique Benoit; Maurizio Cecconi; J Randall Curtis; Glenn Hernandez; Margaret Herridge; Samir Jaber; Michael Joannidis; Laurent Papazian; Mark Peters; Pierre Singer; Martin Smith; Marcio Soares; Antoni Torres; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Elie Azoulay Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 17.440