Literature DB >> 34999641

Retrospective Assessment of Patient and Catheter Characteristics Associated With Malpositioned Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Patients.

Mark D Weber1, Thomas Conlon2, Charlotte Woods-Hill2, Stephanie L Watts1, Eileen Nelson3, Danielle Traynor3, Bingqing Zhang4, Daniela Davis2, Adam S Himebauch2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the prevalence and characteristics associated with malpositioned temporary, nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) placed via the internal jugular (IJ) and subclavian (SC) veins in pediatric patients.
DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Quaternary academic PICU. PATIENTS: Children greater than 1 month to less than 18 years who had a CVC placed between January 2014 and December 2018.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the CVC tip position located on the first postprocedural radiograph. CVC tip was defined as follows: "recommended" (tip location between the carina and two vertebral bodies inferior to the carina), "high" (tip location between one and four vertebral bodies superior to the carina), "low" (tip position three or more vertebral bodies inferior to the carina), and "other" (tip grossly malpositioned). Seven hundred eighty-one CVCs were included: 481 (61.6%) were in "recommended" position, 157 (20.1%) were "high," 131 (16.8%) were "low," and 12 (1.5%) were "other." Multiple multinomial regression (referenced to "recommended" position) showed that left-sided catheters (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.00, 95% CI 1.17-3.40) were associated with "high" CVC tip positions, whereas weight greater than or equal to 40 kg had decreased odds of having a "high" CVC tip compared with the reference (aOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.83). Further, weight category 20-40 kg (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.38-4.23) and females (aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01-2.26) were associated with "low" CVC tip positions. There was no difference in rates of central line-associated blood stream infection, venous thromboembolism, or tissue plasminogen activator usage or dose between the CVCs with tips outside and those within the recommended location.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IJ and SC CVC tips outside of the recommended location was high. Left-sided catheters, patient weight, and sex were associated with malposition. Malpositioned catheters were not associated with increased harm.
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34999641      PMCID: PMC8897221          DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  39 in total

1.  Extravasation and tissue necrosis secondary to central line infusions.

Authors:  A G Davies; W C Russell; J P Thompson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Ultrasound detection of guidewire position during central venous catheterization.

Authors:  Michael B Stone; Arun Nagdev; Michael C Murphy; Craig A Sisson
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition.

Authors:  Lisa A Gorski; Lynn Hadaway; Mary E Hagle; Daphne Broadhurst; Simon Clare; Tricia Kleidon; Britt M Meyer; Barb Nickel; Stephen Rowley; Elizabeth Sharpe; Mary Alexander
Journal:  J Infus Nurs       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb 01

Review 4.  Late cardiac tamponade in adults secondary to tip position in the right atrium: an urban legend? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mauro Pittiruti; Massimo Lamperti
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Perforation of the heart by central venous catheters in infants: guidelines to diagnosis and management.

Authors:  G Bar-Joseph; A G Galvis
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports.

Authors:  Jo Caers; Christel Fontaine; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Johan De Mey; Gerrit Ponnet; Chris Oost; Jan Lamote; Jacques De Greve; Benjamin Van Camp; Patrick Lacor
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Reliability of implantable central venous access devices in patients with cancer.

Authors:  G V Stanislav; R J Fitzgibbons; R T Bailey; J A Mailliard; P S Johnson; J B Feole
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1987-11

8.  Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade in neonates: sudden unexpected death associated with total parenteral nutrition via central venous catheterization.

Authors:  Mikako Warren; Karen S Thompson; Edwina J Popek; Hannes Vogel; John Hicks
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.256

Review 9.  Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jasper M Smit; Reinder Raadsen; Michiel J Blans; Manfred Petjak; Peter M Van de Ven; Pieter R Tuinman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  The "rapid atrial swirl sign" for assessing central venous catheters: Performance by medical residents after limited training.

Authors:  Peter Korsten; Eirini Mavropoulou; Susanne Wienbeck; David Ellenberger; Daniel Patschan; Michael Zeisberg; Radovan Vasko; Björn Tampe; Gerhard A Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.