Literature DB >> 24048680

Total number of lymph nodes harvested is associated with better survival in stages II and III colorectal cancer.

Pramodh Chitral Chandrasinghe1, Dileepa Senajith Ediriweera, Janaki Hewavisenthi, Sumudu Kumarage, Kemal Ismail Deen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node status is important in staging colorectal cancer (CRC). Presence of metastatic nodes differentiates stage III from stage II. The role of adjuvant therapy is still unclear in stage II CRC. Inadequate node sampling may result in inaccurate staging.
METHOD: Records of 131 patients with stages II and III CRC who underwent curative resection, having five or more lymph nodes harvested from the specimen, were prospectively followed up and analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival, based on groups of serially ascending values of lymph nodes harvested. Regression analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazards ratio model with right-censored CRC survival data at a 10 % significance level. The effect of nodal harvest on survival was adjusted for age, sex, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, pathological tumor stage, histological type, differentiation, margin positivity, angioinvasion, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular infiltration.
RESULTS: The total population showed improved survival with 14 or more nodes harvested (p= 0.005). For both rectal (n= 83; p= 0.03) and colon cancers (n= 46; p= 0.08), most significant survival benefits were seen with over 14 nodes harvested, irrespective of the stage. With multiple regression analysis, advanced age (p= 0.003), male sex (p= 0.017), lymphovascular infiltration (p= 0.015), and preoperative CEA levels (p= 0.096) were found to be other significant factors. The lymph node effect remained significant (HR = 0.19, p= 0.004) after adjusting for the above factors.
CONCLUSION: A lymph node harvest of 14 or more resulted in better survival outcome from CRC in this population. Staging of the disease could be accurate with increased nodal harvesting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24048680     DOI: 10.1007/s12664-013-0406-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0254-8860


  23 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal cancer and the 7th revision of the TNM staging system: review of changes and suggestions for uniform pathologic reporting.

Authors:  F L Obrocea; Maria Sajin; Elena Cristina Marinescu; D Stoica
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Immunohistochemical assessment of lymphovascular invasion in stage I colorectal carcinoma: prognostic relevance and correlation with nodal micrometastases.

Authors:  Valeria Barresi; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Enrica Vitarelli; Carmela Di Gregorio; Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Gaetano Barresi
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  C C Compton; L P Fielding; L J Burgart; B Conley; H S Cooper; S R Hamilton; M E Hammond; D E Henson; R V Hutter; R B Nagle; M L Nielsen; D J Sargent; C R Taylor; M Welton; C Willett
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Prognostic significance of total lymph node number in patients with T1-4N0M0 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ugur Berberoglu
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

5.  Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer down-stages the tumor but reduces lymph node harvest significantly.

Authors:  Ruwan E Wijesuriya; Kemal I Deen; Janaki Hewavisenthi; Jayantha Balawardana; Mahendra Perera
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Predictive factors affecting survival in stage II colorectal cancer: is lymph node harvesting relevant?

Authors:  C Peeples; J Shellnut; H Wasvary; T Riggs; J Sacksner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Lymph node evaluation and long-term survival in Stage II and Stage III colon cancer: a national study.

Authors:  Ryash Vather; Tarik Sammour; Arman Kahokehr; Andrew B Connolly; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Lymph node harvests directly influence the staging of colorectal cancer: evidence from a regional audit.

Authors:  D F H Pheby; D F Levine; R W Pitcher; N A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The impact of audit and feedback on nodal harvest in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Porter; Robin Urquhart; Jingyu Bu; Paul Johnson; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Paul M Johnson; Dickram Malatjalian; Geoff A Porter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of perineural invasion in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuchong Yang; Xuanzhang Huang; Jingxu Sun; Peng Gao; Yongxi Song; Xiaowan Chen; Junhua Zhao; Zhenning Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Predicting Individualized Postoperative Survival for Stage II/III Colon Cancer Using a Mobile Application Derived from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Kristopher Attwood; Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu; Eisar Al-Sukhni; Patrick Boland; Steven Nurkin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Colorectal obstruction is a potential prognostic factor for stage II colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yusuke Okuda; Takaya Shimura; Tomonori Yamada; Yoshikazu Hirata; Ryuzo Yamaguchi; Eiji Sakamoto; Hiromi Kataoka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Controversies in the pathological assessment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Kieran Sheahan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The risk factors of local recurrence and distant metastasis on pT1/T2N0 mid-low rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  I-Li Lai; Jeng-Fu You; Yih-Jong Chern; Wen-Sy Tsai; Jy-Ming Chiang; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Hsin-Yuan Hung; Yu-Jen Hsu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Colorectal cancer burden and trends in a South Asian cohort: experience from a regional tertiary care center in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  P C Chandrasinghe; D S Ediriweera; J Hewavisenthi; S K Kumarage; F R Fernando; K I Deen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-10-30

7.  Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Francesco Moccia; Salvatore Tolone; Alfredo Allaria; Vincenzo Napolitano; D'Amico Rosa; Ferrante Ilaria; Manto Ottavia; Edoardo Cesaro; Ludovico Docimo; Landino Fei
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2019-07-11

8.  Overall Survival of Stage III Colon Cancer with Only One Lymph Node Metastasis Is Independently Predicted by Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level and Lymph Node Sampling Status.

Authors:  Been-Ren Lin; Yu-Lin Lin; Hong-Shiee Lai; Po-Huang Lee; King-Jen Chang; Jin-Tung Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.