Literature DB >> 20940600

Predictive factors affecting survival in stage II colorectal cancer: is lymph node harvesting relevant?

C Peeples1, J Shellnut, H Wasvary, T Riggs, J Sacksner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lymph node status is important in colorectal cancer. Multiple studies indicate a relationship between the number of nodes harvested and survival. This is important in patients with stage II disease where the role of adjuvant therapy is unclear. This study sought to analyze the impact of lymph node harvest on survival in patients with stage II colorectal cancer.
METHODS: The data of our hospital's colorectal tumor registry from 1997 to 2008 was reviewed. The records of 3534 patients of all stages were analyzed; of these patients, 913 patients with stage II colorectal cancer underwent curative resection. A univariate analysis estimated 5-year survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on various lymph node groupings. Patients were further analyzed with respect to sex, age, tumor grade, and tumor location. Multivariate linear regression analysis by the Cox proportional hazards model was performed using these variables to analyze survival relative to lymph node harvesting.
RESULTS: Of 913 stage II patients, the mean age was 71 years and 48% were male. Univariate analysis of the number of lymph nodes harvested found that ≥24 nodes removed was a significant and independent factor for improved survival in stage II (P = .009) and ≥36 nodes in stage III cancers (P = .008). Cox proportional hazards ratios found male sex (P < .03) and poorly differentiated tumors (P < .015) to be negative independent risk factors for survival. Tumor location in the sigmoid was associated with improved survival (P < .02).
CONCLUSION: Patients with stage II disease had an improved survival when ≥24 lymph nodes were harvested, and patients with stage III disease had improved survival with up to a 36 node harvest. Male sex and poorly differentiated tumors had a worse prognosis, and tumors located in the sigmoid were associated with improved survival in stage II cancers. An increased lymph node harvest is recommended to improve survival in these stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20940600     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f20116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of lymph nodes in patients with colon cancer undergoing colon resection: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yun-Jau Chang; Yao-Jen Chang; Li-Ju Chen; Kuo-Piao Chung; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Analysis on the correlation between number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis in patients with stage II colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhang Xingmao; Wang Hongying; Zhou Zhixiang; Wang Zheng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  The re-evaluation of optimal lymph node yield in stage II right-sided colon cancer: is a minimum of 12 lymph nodes adequate?

Authors:  Yibo Cai; Guoping Cheng; Xingang Lu; Haixing Ju; Xiu Zhu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Total number of lymph nodes harvested is associated with better survival in stages II and III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pramodh Chitral Chandrasinghe; Dileepa Senajith Ediriweera; Janaki Hewavisenthi; Sumudu Kumarage; Kemal Ismail Deen
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-19

5.  Stage II colon cancer staging using the number of retrieved lymph nodes may be superior to current TNM staging for prognosis stratification: the Japanese study group for postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shimpei Ogawa; Michio Itabashi; Yoshiko Bamba; Kimitaka Tani; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Shinichi Yamauchi; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A medial to lateral approach offers a superior lymph node harvest for laparoscopic right colectomy.

Authors:  Michael Honaker; Samantha Scouten; Jordy Sacksner; Matthew Ziegler; Harry Wasvary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Stage migration resulting from inadequate number of examined lymph nodes impacts prognosis in stage II colon cancer after radical surgery.

Authors:  Di Xie; Xiangping Song; Lingling Tong
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  When is local excision appropriate for "early" rectal cancer?

Authors:  Kotaro Maeda; Yoshikazu Koide; Hidetoshi Katsuno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Survival Contradiction Between Stage IIA and Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Shaobo Mo; Weixing Dai; Wenqiang Xiang; Ben Huang; Yaqi Li; Yang Feng; Qingguo Li; Guoxiang Cai
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.207

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.