Literature DB >> 24048333

Validation of a proliferation-based expression signature as prognostic marker in early stage lung adenocarcinoma.

Ignacio I Wistuba1, Carmen Behrens, Francesca Lombardi, Susanne Wagner, Junya Fujimoto, M Gabriela Raso, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Domenico Galetta, Robyn Riley, Elisha Hughes, Julia Reid, Zaina Sangale, Steven G Swisher, Neda Kalhor, Cesar A Moran, Alexander Gutin, Jerry S Lanchbury, Massimo Barberis, Edward S Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: New prognostic markers to guide treatment decisions in early stage non-small cell lung cancer are necessary to improve patient outcomes. In this report, we assess the utility of a predefined mRNA expression signature of cell-cycle progression genes (CCP score) to define 5-year risk of lung cancer-related death in patients with early stage lung adenocarcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A CCP score was calculated from the mRNA expression levels of 31 proliferation genes in stage I and stage II tumor samples from two public microarray datasets [Director's Consortium (DC) and GSE31210]. The same gene set was tested by quantitative PCR in 381 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary tumors. Association of the CCP score with outcome was assessed by Cox proportional hazards analysis.
RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the CCP score was a strong predictor of cancer-specific survival in both the Director's Consortium cohort (P = 0.00014; HR = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.43-3.02) and GSE31210 (P = 0.0010; HR = 2.25; 95% CI, 1.42-3.56). In multivariate analysis, the CCP score remained the dominant prognostic marker in the presence of clinical variables (P = 0.0022; HR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.29-3.17 in Director's Consortium, P = 0.0026; HR = 2.16; 95% CI, 1.32-3.53 in GSE31210). On a quantitative PCR platform, the CCP score maintained highly significant prognostic value in FFPE-derived mRNA from clinical samples in both univariate (P = 0.00033; HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.39-3.17) and multivariate analyses (P = 0.0071; HR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.18-3.10).
CONCLUSIONS: The CCP score is a significant predictor of lung cancer death in early stage lung adenocarcinoma treated with surgery and may be a valuable tool in selecting patients for adjuvant treatment. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24048333      PMCID: PMC3834029          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  34 in total

1.  Confidence bands for the difference of two survival curves under proportional hazards model.

Authors:  M J Zhang; J P Klein
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Walter J Scott; Mark S Allen; Gail Darling; Bryan Meyers; Paul A Decker; Joe B Putnam; Robert W McKenna; Rodney J Landrenau; David R Jones; Richard I Inculet; Richard A Malthaner
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Gregory P Swanson; Gabrielle Fisher; Arthur R Brothman; Daniel M Berney; Julia E Reid; David Mesher; V O Speights; Elzbieta Stankiewicz; Christopher S Foster; Henrik Møller; Peter Scardino; Jorja D Warren; Jimmy Park; Adib Younus; Darl D Flake; Susanne Wagner; Alexander Gutin; Jerry S Lanchbury; Steven Stone
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with better perioperative outcomes than open lobectomy in a veteran population.

Authors:  Miguel D Cajipe; Danny Chu; Faisal G Bakaeen; Roberto F Casal; Scott A LeMaire; Joseph S Coselli; Lorraine D Cornwell
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  A five-gene and corresponding protein signature for stage-I lung adenocarcinoma prognosis.

Authors:  Humam Kadara; Carmen Behrens; Ping Yuan; Luisa Solis; Diane Liu; Xuemin Gu; John D Minna; J Jack Lee; Edward Kim; Waun-Ki Hong; Ignacio I Wistuba; Reuben Lotan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pignon; Hélène Tribodet; Giorgio V Scagliotti; Jean-Yves Douillard; Frances A Shepherd; Richard J Stephens; Ariane Dunant; Valter Torri; Rafael Rosell; Lesley Seymour; Stephen G Spiro; Estelle Rolland; Roldano Fossati; Delphine Aubert; Keyue Ding; David Waller; Thierry Le Chevalier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  The present status of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Masahiro Tsuboi; Tatsuo Ohira; Hisashi Saji; Kuniharu Miyajima; Naohiro Kajiwara; Osamu Uchida; Jitsuo Usuda; Harubumi Kato
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.520

8.  KIF14 messenger RNA expression is independently prognostic for outcome in lung cancer.

Authors:  Timothy W Corson; Chang Qi Zhu; Suzanne K Lau; Frances A Shepherd; Ming-Sound Tsao; Brenda L Gallie
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Sherene Loi; Laura van't Veer; Giuseppe Viale; Mauro Delorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Mahasti Saghatchian d'Assignies; Jonas Bergh; Rosette Lidereau; Paul Ellis; Adrian Harris; Jan Bogaerts; Patrick Therasse; Arno Floore; Mohamed Amakrane; Fanny Piette; Emiel Rutgers; Christos Sotiriou; Fatima Cardoso; Martine J Piccart
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Prognostic value of a cell cycle progression signature for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort.

Authors:  J Cuzick; D M Berney; G Fisher; D Mesher; H Møller; J E Reid; M Perry; J Park; A Younus; A Gutin; C S Foster; P Scardino; J S Lanchbury; S Stone
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  52 in total

1.  MCM2: An alternative to Ki-67 for measuring breast cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Einas M Yousef; Daniela Furrer; David L Laperriere; Muhammad R Tahir; Sylvie Mader; Caroline Diorio; Louis A Gaboury
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Individualizing adjuvant therapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: we see the destination, but we don't yet know the route.

Authors:  Howard West
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  The expression of four genes as a prognostic classifier for stage I lung adenocarcinoma in 12 independent cohorts.

Authors:  Hirokazu Okayama; Aaron J Schetter; Teruhide Ishigame; Ana I Robles; Takashi Kohno; Jun Yokota; Seiichi Takenoshita; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Is there clinical value to prognostic signatures in early-stage NSCLC?

Authors:  Paul A Bunn; Fred R Hirsch; Dara L Aisner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  A novel protein-based prognostic signature improves risk stratification to guide clinical management in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Elena Martínez-Terroba; Carmen Behrens; Fernando J de Miguel; Jackeline Agorreta; Eduard Monsó; Laura Millares; Cristina Sainz; Miguel Mesa-Guzman; José Luis Pérez-Gracia; María Dolores Lozano; Javier J Zulueta; Ruben Pio; Ignacio I Wistuba; Luis M Montuenga; María J Pajares
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Cost-Utility of a Prognostic Test Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  David D Stenehjem; Brandon K Bellows; Kraig M Yager; Joshua Jones; Rajesh Kaldate; Uwe Siebert; Diana I Brixner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-11-27

7.  Integration of multiple "OMIC" biomarkers: A precision medicine strategy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Ana I Robles; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Genomic Underpinnings of Tumor Behavior in In Situ and Early Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Qian; Shilin Zhao; Yong Zou; S M Jamshedur Rahman; Maria-Fernanda Senosain; Thomas Stricker; Heidi Chen; Charles A Powell; Alain C Borczuk; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Reaching the limits of prognostication in non-small cell lung cancer: an optimized biomarker panel fails to outperform clinical parameters.

Authors:  Marianna Grinberg; Dijana Djureinovic; Hans Rr Brunnström; Johanna Sm Mattsson; Karolina Edlund; Jan G Hengstler; Linnea La Fleur; Simon Ekman; Hirsh Koyi; Eva Branden; Elisabeth Ståhle; Karin Jirström; Derek K Tracy; Fredrik Pontén; Johan Botling; Jörg Rahnenführer; Patrick Micke
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 10.  Prognostic and predictive biomarkers post curative intent therapy.

Authors:  Rebecca Feldman; Edward S Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.