Literature DB >> 24047909

The specificity of stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex increases with repeated exposure to the adapting stimulus.

Paul M Briley1, Katrin Krumbholz.   

Abstract

The neural response to a sensory stimulus tends to be more strongly reduced when the stimulus is preceded by the same, rather than a different, stimulus. This stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) is ubiquitous across the senses. In hearing, SSA has been suggested to play a role in change detection as indexed by the mismatch negativity. This study sought to test whether SSA, measured in human auditory cortex, is caused by neural fatigue (reduction in neural responsiveness) or by sharpening of neural tuning to the adapting stimulus. For that, we measured event-related cortical potentials to pairs of pure tones with varying frequency separation and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). This enabled us to examine the relationship between the degree of specificity of adaptation as a function of frequency separation and the rate of decay of adaptation with increasing SOA. Using simulations of tonotopic neuron populations, we demonstrate that the fatigue model predicts independence of adaptation specificity and decay rate, whereas the sharpening model predicts interdependence. The data showed independence and thus supported the fatigue model. In a second experiment, we measured adaptation specificity after multiple presentations of the adapting stimulus. The multiple adapters produced more adaptation overall, but the effect was more specific to the adapting frequency. Within the context of the fatigue model, the observed increase in adaptation specificity could be explained by assuming a 2.5-fold increase in neural frequency selectivity. We discuss possible bottom-up and top-down mechanisms of this effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electroencephalography, mismatch negativity; human auditory cortex; rapid receptive-field plasticity; stimulus-specific adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24047909      PMCID: PMC3882815          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01015.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  62 in total

1.  The effect of perceptual learning on neuronal responses in monkey visual area V4.

Authors:  Tianming Yang; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Synaptic mechanisms of forward suppression in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Wehr; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Heschl's gyrus, posterior superior temporal gyrus, and mid-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex have different roles in the detection of acoustic changes.

Authors:  Marc Schönwiesner; Nikolai Novitski; Satu Pakarinen; Synnöve Carlson; Mari Tervaniemi; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: a single-cell study of the FMRI adaptation paradigm.

Authors:  Hiromasa Sawamura; Guy A Orban; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Topographic ERP analyses: a step-by-step tutorial review.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Denis Brunet; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Change detection by thalamic reticular neurons.

Authors:  Xiong-Jie Yu; Xin-Xiu Xu; Shigang He; Jufang He
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-16       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Human primary auditory cortex: cytoarchitectonic subdivisions and mapping into a spatial reference system.

Authors:  P Morosan; J Rademacher; A Schleicher; K Amunts; T Schormann; K Zilles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure.

Authors:  R Näätänen; T Picton
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships.

Authors:  T W Picton; D L Woods; G B Proulx
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-08

10.  Selective mechanisms for complex visual patterns revealed by adaptation.

Authors:  J W Peirce; L J Taylor
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  12 in total

1.  Statistical context shapes stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Molly J Henry; Elisa Kim Fromboluti; J Devin McAuley; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Contextual processing in unpredictable auditory environments: the limited resource model of auditory refractoriness in the rhesus.

Authors:  Tobias Teichert; Kate Gurnsey; Dean Salisbury; Robert A Sweet
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  [Effects of auditory response patterns on stimulus-specific adaptation of inferior colliculus neurons in awake mice].

Authors:  Changbao Song; Jinxing Wei; Lv Li; Zhongju Xiao
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-01-30

4.  Sensitivity of rat inferior colliculus neurons to frequency distributions.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Emily X Han; Jonas Obleser; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A putative electrophysiological biomarker of auditory sensory memory encoding is sensitive to pharmacological alterations of excitatory/inhibitory balance in male macaque monkeys.

Authors:  William B Holliday; Kate Gurnsey; Robert A Sweet; Tobias Teichert
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.186

6.  Generalization of sustained neurophysiological effects of short-term auditory 13-Hz stimulation to neighbouring frequency representation in humans.

Authors:  Daria F Kleeva; Anna B Rebreikina; Gurgen A Soghoyan; Daria G Kostanian; Anastacia N Neklyudova; Olga V Sysoeva
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.698

7.  Frequency-specific adaptation and its underlying circuit model in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Li Shen; Lingyun Zhao; Bo Hong
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 8.  Coding space-time stimulus dynamics in auditory brain maps.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; Yoram Gutfreund; José L Peña
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat show stimulus-specific adaptation for frequency, but not for intensity.

Authors:  Daniel Duque; Xin Wang; Javier Nieto-Diego; Katrin Krumbholz; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Neural Responses and Perceptual Sensitivity to Sound Depend on Sound-Level Statistics.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Thomas Augereau; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.