Literature DB >> 26354316

Sensitivity of rat inferior colliculus neurons to frequency distributions.

Björn Herrmann1, Aravindakshan Parthasarathy2, Emily X Han2, Jonas Obleser3, Edward L Bartlett2.   

Abstract

Stimulus-specific adaptation refers to a neural response reduction to a repeated stimulus that does not generalize to other stimuli. However, stimulus-specific adaptation appears to be influenced by additional factors. For example, the statistical distribution of tone frequencies has recently been shown to dynamically alter stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex. The present study investigated whether statistical stimulus distributions also affect stimulus-specific adaptation at an earlier stage of the auditory hierarchy. Neural spiking activity and local field potentials were recorded from inferior colliculus neurons of rats while tones were presented in oddball sequences that formed two different statistical contexts. Each sequence consisted of a repeatedly presented tone (standard) and three rare deviants of different magnitudes (small, moderate, large spectral change). The critical manipulation was the relative probability with which large spectral changes occurred. In one context the probability was high (relative to all deviants), while it was low in the other context. We observed larger responses for deviants compared with standards, confirming previous reports of increased response adaptation for frequently presented tones. Importantly, the statistical context in which tones were presented strongly modulated stimulus-specific adaptation. Physically and probabilistically identical stimuli (moderate deviants) in the two statistical contexts elicited different response magnitudes consistent with neural gain changes and thus neural sensitivity adjustments induced by the spectral range of a stimulus distribution. The data show that already at the level of the inferior colliculus stimulus-specific adaptation is dynamically altered by the statistical context in which stimuli occur.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inferior colliculus; statistical context; stimulus-specific adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26354316      PMCID: PMC4737421          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00555.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  89 in total

1.  Effect of auditory cortex deactivation on stimulus-specific adaptation in the medial geniculate body.

Authors:  Flora M Antunes; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Stimulus-specific adaptation, habituation and change detection in the gaze control system.

Authors:  Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 3.  Short-term plasticity in auditory cognition.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 4.  Gain control mechanisms in the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Benjamin Louis Robinson; David McAlpine
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Stimulus-specific adaptation and its dynamics in the inferior colliculus of rat.

Authors:  L Zhao; Y Liu; L Shen; L Feng; B Hong
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  Hearing in noisy environments: noise invariance and contrast gain control.

Authors:  Ben D B Willmore; James E Cooke; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Stimulus-specific adaptation in the inferior colliculus of the mouse: anesthesia and spontaneous activity effects.

Authors:  Daniel Duque; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.270

8.  Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Delpuech; J Pernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Frequency-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex depends on the spectral variance in the acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Molly J Henry; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A computational model of inferior colliculus responses to amplitude modulated sounds in young and aged rats.

Authors:  Cal F Rabang; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Yamini Venkataraman; Zachery L Fisher; Stephanie M Gardner; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.492

View more
  6 in total

1.  Aging alters envelope representations of speech-like sounds in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Björn Herrmann; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Ageing affects dual encoding of periodicity and envelope shape in rat inferior colliculus neurons.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Aging Affects Adaptation to Sound-Level Statistics in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Burkhard Maess; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Hierarchical winner-take-all particle swarm optimization social network for neural model fitting.

Authors:  Brandon S Coventry; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Alexandra L Sommer; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Sound level context modulates neural activity in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Sonia Yasmin; Kurdo Araz; David W Purcell; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Neural Responses and Perceptual Sensitivity to Sound Depend on Sound-Level Statistics.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Thomas Augereau; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.