Literature DB >> 2404516

Investigations on the influence of headgroup substitution and isoprene side-chain length in the function of primary and secondary quinones of bacterial reaction centers.

J C McComb1, R R Stein, C A Wraight.   

Abstract

The contributions of headgroup and side-chain in the binding and function of the primary (QA) and secondary (QB) quinones of isolated reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were investigated. Various ubiquinones and structurally similar quinones were reconstituted into RCs depleted of one (1Q-RCs) or both (0Q-RCs) quinones. The influence of partition coefficients on the apparent binding affinities was minimized by expressing dissociation constants in terms of the mole fraction of quinone partitioned into the detergent. It was then apparent that the size of the isoprenyl side-chain was of little consequence in determining the binding affinity or the functional competence of either QA or QB, although an alkyl chain of equivalent size was a poor substitute. The degree of substitution of the headgroup, however, was a sensitive determinant of binding. For both quinone sites, the trisubstituted plastoquinones bond more weakly than the fully substituted ubiquinones. Similarly, for binding to the QA site, duroquinone (tetramethylbenzoquinone) bound much more strongly than trimethylbenzoquinone. The affinity of the QA site for ubiquinones was about 20-times stronger than the QB site, but the QB site is probably not more specific than the QA site. However, QB function depends on a suitable redox free-energy drop from QA as well as binding, and of all the quinones tested only the ubiquinones simultaneously supported full QA and QB activity. Even plastoquinone-A, which fills both roles in Photosystem II, was unable to do so in bacterial RCs, although it did bind. The unique ability of ubiquinones to both bind and provide the appropriate redox span is discussed. The temperature dependence of binding of the isoprenyl ubiquinones at the QA site changed markedly with chain length. For Q-10-Q-7, the binding enthalpy was positive and net binding was entirely driven by entropic factors. For the shorter-chain ubiquinones, Q-6-Q-1, both entropy and enthalpy of binding were favorable. This strong entropy-enthalpy compensation is suggested to arise from antagonistic interactions (anticooperativity) between headgroup and tail binding. For QB function by hydrophobic quinones, the temperature dependence of the micelle properties prevented easy access to thermodynamic parameters. However, for water-soluble Q-0, binding to the QB site was determined to be enthalpically driven.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2404516     DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(90)90227-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  22 in total

1.  Trapped conformational states of semiquinone (D+*QB-*) formed by B-branch electron transfer at low temperature in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers.

Authors:  M L Paddock; M Flores; R Isaacson; C Chang; E C Abresch; P Selvaduray; M Y Okamura
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Conformational gating of the electron transfer reaction QA-.QB --> QAQB-. in bacterial reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides determined by a driving force assay.

Authors:  M S Graige; G Feher; M Y Okamura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nuclear mutations affecting plastoquinone accumulation in maize.

Authors:  W B Cook; D Miles
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Coupling of cytochrome and quinone turnovers in the photocycle of reaction centers from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  S Osváth; P Maróti
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Semiquinone oscillations as a tool for investigating the ubiquinone binding to photosynthetic reaction centers.

Authors:  Fulvio Ciriaco; Rocco Roberto Tangorra; Alessandra Antonucci; Livia Giotta; Angela Agostiano; Massimo Trotta; Francesco Milano
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Colin A. Wraight, 1945-2014.

Authors:  Roger C Prince; Donald R Ort
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  The relationship between the structure of plastoquinone derivatives and their biological activity in Photosystem II of spinach chloroplasts.

Authors:  B L Liu; A J Hoff; L Q Gu; L B Li; P Z Zhou
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Affinity and activity of non-native quinones at the Q(B) site of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhang; M R Gunner
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  The redox midpoint potential of the primary quinone of reaction centers in chromatophores of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is pH independent.

Authors:  Péter Maróti; Colin A Wraight
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 1.733

10.  Study of wild type and genetically modified reaction centers from Rhodobacter capsulatus: structural comparison with Rhodopseudomonas viridis and Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  L Baciou; E J Bylina; P Sebban
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.