Literature DB >> 8218894

Study of wild type and genetically modified reaction centers from Rhodobacter capsulatus: structural comparison with Rhodopseudomonas viridis and Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

L Baciou1, E J Bylina, P Sebban.   

Abstract

Reaction centers from the purple bacterium Rhodobacter (Rb.) capsulatus and from two mutants ThrL226-->Ala and IleL229-->Ser, modified in the binding protein pocket of the secondary quinone acceptor (QB), have been studied by flash-induced absorbance spectroscopy. In ThrL226-->Ala, the binding affinities for endogenous QB (ubiquinone 10) and UQ6 are found to be two to three times as high as the wild type. In contrast, in IleL229-->Ser, the binding affinity for UQ6 is decreased about three times compared to the wild type. In ThrL226-->Ala, a markedly increased sensitivity (approximately 30 times) to o-phenanthroline is observed. In Rhodopseudomonas viridis, where Ala is naturally in position L226, the sensitivity to o-phenanthroline is close to that observed in ThrL226-->Ala. We propose that the presence of Ala in position L226 is responsible for the high sensitivity to that inhibitor. The pH dependencies of the rate constants of P+QB- (kBP) charge recombination kinetics (P is a dimer of bacteriochlorophyll, and QB is the secondary quinone electron acceptor) show destabilization of QB- in ThrL226-->Ala and IleL229-->Ser, compared to the wild type. At low pH, similar apparent pK values of protonation of amino acids around QB- are measured in the wild type and the mutants. In contrast to Rb. sphaeroides, in the wild type Rb. capsulatus, kBP substantially increases in the pH range 7-10. This may reflect some differences in the respective structures of both strains or, alternatively, may be due to deprotonation of TyrL 215 in Rb. capsulatus. At pH 7, measurements of the rate constant of QA to QB electron transfer reveal a threefold greater rate in the reaction centers from wild type Rb. capsulatus (65 +/- 1 0 ps)-1 compared to Rb. sphaeroides.We suggest that this may arise from a 0.7-A smaller distance between the quinones in the former strain. Our spectroscopic data on the wild type Rb. capsulatus reaction center suggest the existence of notable differences with the Rb. sphaeroides reaction center structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8218894      PMCID: PMC1225767          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81114-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  14 in total

1.  In bacterial reaction centers protons can diffuse to the secondary quinone by alternative pathways.

Authors:  D K Hanson; L Baciou; D M Tiede; S L Nance; M Schiffer; P Sebban
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1992-09-25

2.  Comparison of reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodopseudomonas viridis: overall architecture and protein-pigment interactions.

Authors:  O el-Kabbani; C H Chang; D Tiede; J Norris; M Schiffer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-06-04       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Structure of the membrane-bound protein photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  C H Chang; O el-Kabbani; D Tiede; J Norris; M Schiffer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-06-04       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: protein-cofactor (quinones and Fe2+) interactions.

Authors:  J P Allen; G Feher; T O Yeates; H Komiya; D C Rees
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Kinetics of electron transfer between the primary and the secondary electron acceptor in reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.

Authors:  A Vermeglio; R K Clayton
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1977-07-07

6.  Characterization of four herbicide-resistant mutants of Rhodopseudomonas viridis by genetic analysis, electron paramagnetic resonance, and optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  I Sinning; H Michel; P Mathis; A W Rutherford
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-06-27       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Study of QB- stabilization in herbicide-resistant mutants from the purple bacterium Rhodopseudomonas viridis.

Authors:  L Baciou; I Sinning; P Sebban
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-09-17       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Proton and electron transfer in the acceptor quinone complex of Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers: characterization of site-directed mutants of the two ionizable residues, GluL212 and AspL213, in the QB binding site.

Authors:  E Takahashi; C A Wraight
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1992-01-28       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Electron transfer in reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. I. Determination of the charge recombination pathway of D+QAQ(-)B and free energy and kinetic relations between Q(-)AQB and QAQ(-)B.

Authors:  D Kleinfeld; M Y Okamura; G Feher
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1984-07-27

10.  Pigment-protein interactions in the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodopseudomonas viridis.

Authors:  H Michel; O Epp; J Deisenhofer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  Characterization of a symmetrized mutant RC with 42 residues from the QA site replacing residues in the Q(B) site.

Authors:  J Li; W J Coleman; D C Youvan; M R Gunner
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Electron transfer in reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodobacter capsulatus monitored by fluorescence of the bacteriochlorophyll dimer.

Authors:  S Osváth; G Laczkó; P Sebban; P Maróti
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Proton uptake by bacterial reaction centers: the protein complex responds in a similar manner to the reduction of either quinone acceptor.

Authors:  J Miksovska; M Schiffer; D K Hanson; P Sebban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Proton conduction within the reaction centers of Rhodobacter capsulatus: the electrostatic role of the protein.

Authors:  P Maróti; D K Hanson; L Baciou; M Schiffer; P Sebban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Ile(L229) → Met mutation impairs the quinone binding to the QB-pocket in reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  J Tandori; L Nagy; A Puskás; M Droppa; G Horváth; P Maróti
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.573

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.