Literature DB >> 26598944

Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Håvard E Danielsen1, Manohar Pradhan1, Marco Novelli2.   

Abstract

Chromosome instability (CIN) is gaining increasing interest as a central process in cancer. CIN, either past or present, is indicated whenever tumour cells harbour an abnormal quantity of DNA, termed 'aneuploidy'. At present, the most widely used approach to detecting aneuploidy is DNA cytometry - a well-known research assay that involves staining of DNA in the nuclei of cells from a tissue sample, followed by analysis using quantitative flow cytometry or microscopic imaging. Aneuploidy in cancer tissue has been implicated as a predictor of a poor prognosis. In this Review, we have explored this hypothesis by surveying the current landscape of peer-reviewed research in which DNA cytometry has been applied in studies with disease-appropriate clinical follow up. This area of research is broad, however, and we restricted our survey to results published since 2000 relating to seven common epithelial cancers (those of the breast; endometrium, ovary, and uterine cervix; oesophagus; colon and rectum; lung; prostate; and bladder). We placed particular emphasis on results from multivariate analyses to pinpoint situations in which the prognostic value of aneuploidy as a biomarker is strong compared with that of existing indicators, such as clinical stage, histological grade, and specific molecular markers. We summarize the implications of our findings for the prognostic use of ploidy analysis in the clinic and for the theoretical understanding of the role of CIN in carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598944     DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  176 in total

Review 1.  Is there a case for routine clinical application of ploidy measurements in gastrointestinal tumours?

Authors:  H Grabsch; D Kerr; P Quirke
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Consensus report of the task force on standardisation of DNA flow cytometry in clinical pathology. DNA Flow Cytometry Task Force of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

Authors:  M G Ormerod; B Tribukait; W Giaretti
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.916

3.  Five-year prospective study of DNA tumor ploidy and colorectal cancer survival.

Authors:  M A Chapman; J D Hardcastle; N C Armitage
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Combined flow cytometry determination of S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic factor in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma: analysis of a series of 271 patients with stage I and II breast cancer.

Authors:  L Moureau-Zabotto; C Bouchet; D Cesari; S Uzan; J-P Lefranc; M Antoine; C Genestie; E Deniaud-Alexandre; J-F Bernaudin; E Touboul; J Fleury-Feith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Usefulness of DNA ploidy measurement on liquid-based smears showing conflicting results between cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus typing.

Authors:  Marianne Lorenzato; Jean-Paul Bory; Jöel Cucherousset; Jean-Marie Nou; Dominique Bouttens; Corinne Thil; Francine Dez; Ghislaine Evrard; Christian Quereux; Philippe Birembaut; Christine Clavel
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Detection of DNA aneuploidy in exfoliated airway epithelia cells of sputum specimens by the automated image cytometry and its clinical value in the identification of lung cancer.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Yikai Zhou
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2004

7.  Cyclin B2 and p53 control proper timing of centrosome separation.

Authors:  Hyun-Ja Nam; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 8.  DNA image cytometry in bladder cancer: state of the art.

Authors:  Carlos A Palmeira; Paula A Oliveira; Fernanda Seixas; Maria A Pires; Carlos Lopes; Lúcio Santos
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Prognostic value of proliferation, apoptosis, defective DNA mismatch repair, and p53 overexpression in patients with resected Dukes' B2 or C colon cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study.

Authors:  Megan M Garrity; Lawrence J Burgart; Michelle R Mahoney; Harold E Windschitl; Muhammad Salim; Martin Wiesenfeld; James E Krook; John C Michalak; Richard M Goldberg; Michael J O'Connell; Alfred F Furth; Daniel J Sargent; Linda M Murphy; Eunice Hill; Darren L Riehle; Cecelia H Meyers; Thomas E Witzig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Size Does Matter: Why Polyploid Tumor Cells are Critical Drug Targets in the War on Cancer.

Authors:  Jermaine Coward; Angus Harding
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  38 in total

1.  Genome Instability Profiles Predict Disease Outcome in a Cohort of 4,003 Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Annette Lischka; Natalie Doberstein; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Ayla Koçak; Timo Gemoll; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried; Gert Auer; Jens K Habermann
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  [Molecular biomarkers and prognostic factors for prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Kretschmer; Y Tolkach; J Ellinger; G Kristiansen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  The role of automated cytometry in the new era of cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Marco Danova; Martina Torchio; Giuditta Comolli; Andrea Sbrana; Andrea Antonuzzo; Giuliano Mazzini
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08-20

4.  DNA helix: the importance of being AT-rich.

Authors:  A E Vinogradov; O V Anatskaya
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  Determinants and clinical implications of chromosomal instability in cancer.

Authors:  Laurent Sansregret; Bart Vanhaesebroeck; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Large Copy-Number Variants in UK Biobank Caused by Clonal Hematopoiesis May Confound Penetrance Estimates.

Authors:  Marcus Tuke; Jessica Tyrrell; Katherine S Ruth; Robin N Beaumont; Andrew R Wood; Anna Murray; Timothy M Frayling; Michael N Weedon; Caroline F Wright
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A novel evaluation method for Ki-67 immunostaining in paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Eliane Pedra Dias; Nathália Silva Carlos Oliveira; Amanda Oliveira Serra-Campos; Anna Karoline Fausto da Silva; Licínio Esmeraldo da Silva; Karin Soares Cunha
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  Mutation-selection balance and compensatory mechanisms in tumour evolution.

Authors:  Erez Persi; Yuri I Wolf; David Horn; Eytan Ruppin; Francesca Demichelis; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Prognostic relevance of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer revisited: The 25-year experience of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon.

Authors:  António E Pinto; Teresa Pereira; Giovani L Silva; Saudade André
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Aneuploidy drives lethal progression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Konrad H Stopsack; Charles A Whittaker; Travis A Gerke; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; Lorelei A Mucci; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.