Literature DB >> 24041748

A computer-based feedback only intervention with and without a moderation skills component.

Cameron C Weaver1, Thad R Leffingwell, Nathaniel J Lombardi, Kasey R Claborn, Mary E Miller, Matthew P Martens.   

Abstract

Research on the efficacy of computer-delivered feedback-only interventions (FOIs) for college alcohol misuse has been mixed. Limitations to these FOIs include participant engagement and variation in the use of a moderation skills component. The current investigation sought to address these limitations using a novel computer-delivered FOI, the Drinkers Assessment and Feedback Tool for College Students (DrAFT-CS). Heavy drinking college students (N=176) were randomly assigned to DrAFT-CS, DrAFT-CS plus moderation skills (DrAFT-CS+), moderation skills only (MSO), or assessment only (AO) group, and were assessed at 1-month follow-up (N=157). Participants in the DrAFT-CS and DrAFT-CS+groups reported significantly lower estimated blood alcohol concentrations (eBACs) on typical heaviest drinking day than participants in the AO group. The data also supported the incorporation of a moderation skills component within FOIs, such that participants in DrAFT-CS+group reported significantly fewer drinks per week and drinks per heaviest drinking occasion than participants in the AO group.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol use; College students; Computer delivery; Moderation skills; Personalized feedback

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24041748      PMCID: PMC4154817          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  31 in total

1.  Randomized trial comparing computer-delivered and face-to-face personalized feedback interventions for high-risk drinking among college students.

Authors:  Theodore L Wagener; Thad R Leffingwell; Joe Mignogna; Melissa R Mignogna; Cameron C Weaver; Nathaniel J Cooney; Kasey R Claborn
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-12-23

Review 2.  Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006.

Authors:  Mary E Larimer; Jessica M Cronce
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  A randomized trial of motivational interviewing and feedback with heavy drinking college students.

Authors:  Patricia Juárez; Scott T Walters; Mikyta Daugherty; Christopher Radi
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2006

4.  Brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers: face-to-face versus computerized feedback.

Authors:  Leon H Butler; Christopher J Correia
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2009-03

5.  Computerized versus motivational interviewing alcohol interventions: impact on discrepancy, motivation, and drinking.

Authors:  James G Murphy; Ashley A Dennhardt; Jessica R Skidmore; Matthew P Martens; Meghan E McDevitt-Murphy
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2010-12

6.  Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Scott T Walters; Amanda M Vader; T Robert Harris; Craig A Field; Ernest N Jouriles
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-02

7.  Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; James M Henson; Michael P Carey; Stephen A Maisto
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-02

Review 8.  Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005.

Authors:  Ralph W Hingson; Wenxing Zha; Elissa R Weitzman
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl       Date:  2009-07

9.  Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mary E Larimer; Christine M Lee; Jason R Kilmer; Patricia M Fabiano; Christopher B Stark; Irene M Geisner; Kimberly A Mallett; Ty W Lostutter; Jessica M Cronce; Maggie Feeney; Clayton Neighbors
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-04

10.  Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students.

Authors:  Nancy P Barnett; James G Murphy; Suzanne M Colby; Peter M Monti
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  3 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of a very brief, multicomponent web-based alcohol intervention for undergraduates with a focus on protective behavioral strategies.

Authors:  Robert F Leeman; Kelly S DeMartini; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Christine Nogueira; William R Corbin; Clayton Neighbors; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-09-05

2.  Efficacy of the College Drinkers Check-Up for Student Drinkers Living Off Campus.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Sara G Balestrieri; Mary Beth Miller; Jennifer E Merrill; Angelo M DiBello; Madeline B Benz
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 3.  Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations.

Authors:  Eileen Fs Kaner; Fiona R Beyer; Claire Garnett; David Crane; Jamie Brown; Colin Muirhead; James Redmore; Amy O'Donnell; James J Newham; Frank de Vocht; Matthew Hickman; Heather Brown; Gregory Maniatopoulos; Susan Michie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.