Literature DB >> 17345916

A randomized trial of motivational interviewing and feedback with heavy drinking college students.

Patricia Juárez1, Scott T Walters, Mikyta Daugherty, Christopher Radi.   

Abstract

Motivational interviewing (MI) is a brief intervention that has been shown to reduce heavy drinking among college students. Because all college studies of MI to date have included a personalized feedback report, it remains unclear which of the components is necessary to produce behavior change. This study evaluated the separate and collective effects of MI and feedback among 122 "binge" drinking college students. Participants were randomized to: (1) MI with feedback, (2) MI without feedback, (3) Mailed feedback only, (4) MI with mailed feedback, or (5) Assessment only control. At an eight-week follow-up, all groups reduced their consumption, peak BAC, consequences, and dependence symptoms. For females, there were reductions in consequences and dependence symptoms in groups that received feedback, as compared to groups that did not receive feedback. For females, there was an effect of the feedback on consequences and dependence symptoms, but was no overall effect of MI on any outcome measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17345916     DOI: 10.2190/753N-8242-727T-G63L

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Drug Educ        ISSN: 0047-2379


  24 in total

1.  Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach outcomes differ among emerging adults and adolescents.

Authors:  Douglas C Smith; Susan H Godley; Mark D Godley; Michael L Dennis
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-08-09

2.  Interaction between the ADH1B*3 allele and drinking motives on alcohol use among Black college students.

Authors:  Michelle J Zaso; Jessica M Desalu; Jueun Kim; Kavita Suryadevara; John M Belote; Aesoon Park
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 3.  Face-to-face versus computer-delivered alcohol interventions for college drinkers: a meta-analytic review, 1998 to 2010.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Jennifer C Elliott; Lorra Garey; Michael P Carey
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-09-01

4.  The route to change: within-session predictors of change plan completion in a motivational interview.

Authors:  Molly Magill; Timothy R Apodaca; Nancy P Barnett; Peter M Monti
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2010-02-10

5.  Change plan as an active ingredient of brief motivational interventions for reducing negative consequences of drinking in hazardous drinking emergency-department patients.

Authors:  Christina S Lee; Janette Baird; Richard Longabaugh; Ted D Nirenberg; Michael J Mello; Robert Woolard
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.582

6.  Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Scott T Walters; Amanda M Vader; T Robert Harris; Craig A Field; Ernest N Jouriles
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-02

Review 7.  Comparative Effectiveness of Brief Alcohol Interventions for College Students: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emily Alden Hennessy; Emily E Tanner-Smith; Dimitris Mavridis; Sean P Grant
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2019-07

8.  A computer-based feedback only intervention with and without a moderation skills component.

Authors:  Cameron C Weaver; Thad R Leffingwell; Nathaniel J Lombardi; Kasey R Claborn; Mary E Miller; Matthew P Martens
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-09-14

9.  Personalized drinking feedback: A meta-analysis of in-person versus computer-delivered interventions.

Authors:  Jennifer M Cadigan; Angela M Haeny; Matthew P Martens; Cameron C Weaver; Stephanie K Takamatsu; Brooke J Arterberry
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-12-08

10.  Effect of motivational interviewing on reduction of alcohol use.

Authors:  Adeline Nyamathi; Steven Shoptaw; Allan Cohen; Barbara Greengold; Kamala Nyamathi; Mary Marfisee; Viviane de Castro; Farinaz Khalilifard; Daniel George; Barbara Leake
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.