Literature DB >> 17707594

Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students.

Nancy P Barnett1, James G Murphy, Suzanne M Colby, Peter M Monti.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two brief interventions and the inclusion of a 1-month booster session with college students who were referred to attend alcohol education following an alcohol-related incident. Participants (N=225; 48.9% male) were randomly assigned to receive one session of a Brief Motivational Interview (BMI) or computer-delivered intervention (CDI) with the Alcohol 101 CD-ROM. Participants were also randomly assigned to booster/no booster. At 3-month follow up, participants in BMI reported greater help seeking and use of behavioral strategies to moderate drinking. At 12-month follow up, BMI participants were drinking more frequently and CDI participants were consuming a greater number of drinks per occasion than at baseline. Mediation analyses showed that the use of specific behavioral strategies mediated the effect of the BMI condition on drinking volume. There was no intervention effect on alcohol problems, and the booster condition did not significantly affect outcomes. Promoting specific behaviors in the context of in-person brief interventions may be a promising approach to reducing drinking volume among identified at-risk students.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17707594      PMCID: PMC2000456          DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  48 in total

1.  Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students.

Authors:  Kim Fromme; William Corbin
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-12

2.  Protective behavioral strategies when drinking alcohol and their relationship to negative alcohol-related consequences in college students.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Kari K Taylor; Krista M Damann; Jennifer C Page; Emily S Mowry; M Dolores Cimini
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2004-12

3.  Active ingredients: how and why evidence-based alcohol behavioral treatment interventions work.

Authors:  Richard Longabaugh; Dennis M Donovan; Mitchell P Karno; Barbara S McCrady; Jon Morgenstern; J Scott Tonigan
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Drinking on campus. Undergraduate intoxication requiring emergency care.

Authors:  S W Wright; C M Slovis
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1996-07

5.  Optimizing the cost-effectiveness of alcohol treatment: a rationale for extended case monitoring.

Authors:  R L Stout; A Rubin; W Zwick; W Zywiak; L Bellino
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.

Authors:  G A Marlatt; J S Baer; D R Kivlahan; L A Dimeff; M E Larimer; L A Quigley; J M Somers; E Williams
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1998-08

7.  A cross-national trial of brief interventions with heavy drinkers. WHO Brief Intervention Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II.

Authors:  J B Saunders; O G Aasland; T F Babor; J R de la Fuente; M Grant
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Interest in a stepped approach model (SAM): identification of recruitment strategies for university alcohol programs.

Authors:  D R Black; D C Coster
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1996-02

10.  Assessing alcohol problems in college students.

Authors:  S C Hurlbut; K J Sher
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  1992-09
View more
  122 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking.

Authors:  James G Murphy; Ashley A Dennhardt; Jessica R Skidmore; Brian Borsari; Nancy P Barnett; Suzanne M Colby; Matthew P Martens
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-06-04

2.  Multicultural web-based motivational interviewing for clients with a first-time DUI offense.

Authors:  Karen Chan Osilla; Elizabeth J D'Amico; Claudia M Díaz-Fuentes; Marielena Lara; Katherine E Watkins
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2012-04

3.  Distinguishing subpopulations of marijuana users with latent profile analysis.

Authors:  Matthew R Pearson; Adrian J Bravo; Bradley T Conner
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Efficacy of the College Drinkers Check-Up for Student Drinkers Living Off Campus.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Sara G Balestrieri; Mary Beth Miller; Jennifer E Merrill; Angelo M DiBello; Madeline B Benz
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 5.  Individual and situational factors that influence the efficacy of personalized feedback substance use interventions for mandated college students.

Authors:  Eun Young Mun; Helene R White; Thomas J Morgan
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-02

6.  Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; James M Henson; Michael P Carey; Stephen A Maisto
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-02

7.  A computer-based feedback only intervention with and without a moderation skills component.

Authors:  Cameron C Weaver; Thad R Leffingwell; Nathaniel J Lombardi; Kasey R Claborn; Mary E Miller; Matthew P Martens
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-09-14

8.  Specialty substance use disorder services following brief alcohol intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Joseph E Glass; Ashley M Hamilton; Byron J Powell; Brian E Perron; Randall T Brown; Mark A Ilgen
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Personalized drinking feedback: A meta-analysis of in-person versus computer-delivered interventions.

Authors:  Jennifer M Cadigan; Angela M Haeny; Matthew P Martens; Cameron C Weaver; Stephanie K Takamatsu; Brooke J Arterberry
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-12-08

10.  Protective behavioral strategies as a mediator between depressive symptom fluctuations and alcohol consumption: a longitudinal examination among college students.

Authors:  Ashley N Linden-Carmichael; Abby L Braitman; James M Henson
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.