Literature DB >> 24041397

Parafoveal preprocessing in reading revisited: evidence from a novel preview manipulation.

Benjamin Gagl1, Stefan Hawelka1, Fabio Richlan1, Sarah Schuster1, Florian Hutzler1.   

Abstract

The study investigated parafoveal preprocessing by the means of the classical invisible boundary paradigm and a novel manipulation of the parafoveal previews (i.e., visual degradation). Eye movements were investigated on 5-letter target words with constraining (i.e., highly informative) initial letters or similarly constraining final letters. Visual degradation was administered to all, no, the initial, or the final 2 letters of the parafoveal preview of the target words. Critically, the manipulation of the parafoveal previews did not interfere with foveal processing. Thus, we had a proper baseline to which we could relate our main findings, which were as follows: First, the valid (i.e., nondegraded) preview of the target words' final letters led to shorter fixation times compared to the baseline condition (i.e., the degradation of all letters). Second, this preview benefit for the final letters was comparable to the benefit of previewing the initial letters. Third, the preview of a constraining initial letter sequence, however, yielded a larger preview benefit than the preview of an unconstraining initial letter sequence. The latter finding indicates that preprocessing constraining initial letters is particularly conducive to foveal word recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24041397     DOI: 10.1037/a0034408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  11 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Preview frequency effects in reading: evidence from Chinese.

Authors:  Jinger Pan; Ming Yan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-27

3.  Semantic preview benefit in reading English: The effect of initial letter capitalization.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Elizabeth R Schotter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Klara Gregorova; Julius Golch; Stefan Hawelka; Jona Sassenhagen; Alessandro Tavano; David Poeppel; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-12-06

5.  Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers.

Authors:  Christina Marx; Stefan Hawelka; Sarah Schuster; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  An investigation of parafoveal masks with the incremental boundary paradigm.

Authors:  Florian Hutzler; Sarah Schuster; Christina Marx; Stefan Hawelka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Context-Based Facilitation in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Visual and Lexical But Not Pre-Lexical Contributions.

Authors:  Susanne Eisenhauer; Christian J Fiebach; Benjamin Gagl
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-05-09

8.  An incremental boundary study on parafoveal preprocessing in children reading aloud: Parafoveal masks overestimate the preview benefit.

Authors:  Christina Marx; Stefan Hawelka; Sarah Schuster; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-07-04

9.  On the Development of Parafoveal Preprocessing: Evidence from the Incremental Boundary Paradigm.

Authors:  Christina Marx; Florian Hutzler; Sarah Schuster; Stefan Hawelka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-14

10.  Blue hypertext is a good design decision: no perceptual disadvantage in reading and successful highlighting of relevant information.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.