Literature DB >> 35083499

Preview frequency effects in reading: evidence from Chinese.

Jinger Pan1, Ming Yan2.   

Abstract

Studies about sentence reading have shown that visual and lexical information beyond the currently fixated word can be integrated across fixations. The gaze-contingent boundary paradigm has been used widely to explore the extent to which parafoveal information can be processed before a word is fixated on. However, a critical review of the current literature suggests that unrelated mask previews are an unlikely baseline control with zero lexical activation, blurring the nature of experimental effects observed in the paradigm. The present study, therefore, aimed at shedding light on the effect of parafoveal mask properties through a manipulation of preview word frequency. Low-frequency preview words that are unrelated to target words elicited a larger interference than high-frequency preview words. We discuss implications of the preview frequency effect for computational models of eye-movement control in reading.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35083499     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01628-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  42 in total

1.  Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study.

Authors:  Sven Hohenstein; Jochen Laubrock; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Semantic preview benefit during reading.

Authors:  Sven Hohenstein; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: the role of letter and word units.

Authors:  A W Inhoff
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-04

8.  Parafoveal preprocessing in reading revisited: evidence from a novel preview manipulation.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Stefan Hawelka; Fabio Richlan; Sarah Schuster; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The effect of high- and low-frequency previews and sentential fit on word skipping during reading.

Authors:  Bernhard Angele; Abby E Laishley; Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Parafoveal X-masks interfere with foveal word recognition: evidence from fixation-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Florian Hutzler; Isabella Fuchs; Benjamin Gagl; Sarah Schuster; Fabio Richlan; Mario Braun; Stefan Hawelka
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.