Literature DB >> 26479544

The slow developmental time course of real-time spoken word recognition.

Hannah Rigler1, Ashley Farris-Trimble2, Lea Greiner1, Jessica Walker1, J Bruce Tomblin1, Bob McMurray1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the developmental time course of spoken word recognition in older children using eye tracking to assess how the real-time processing dynamics of word recognition change over development. We found that 9-year-olds were slower to activate the target words and showed more early competition from competitor words than 16-year-olds; however, both age groups ultimately fixated targets to the same degree. This contrasts with a prior study of adolescents with language impairment (McMurray, Samelson, Lee, & Tomblin, 2010) that showed a different pattern of real-time processes. These findings suggest that the dynamics of word recognition are still developing even at these late ages, and developmental changes may derive from different sources than individual differences in relative language ability. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26479544      PMCID: PMC4648636          DOI: 10.1037/dev0000044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  44 in total

Review 1.  Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  R Kail
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

5.  A method for studying the generalized slowing hypothesis in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  R Kail
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-04

6.  Information processing speed as a predictor of IQ in children with and without specific language impairment in grades 3 and 8.

Authors:  Jisook Park; Elina Mainela-Arnold; Carol A Miller
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 7.  Lexical learning and lexical processing in children with developmental language impairments.

Authors:  Kate Nation
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Lexical activation during sentence comprehension in adolescents with history of Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Arielle Borovsky; Erin Burns; Jeffrey L Elman; Julia L Evans
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Lexical representations in children with SLI: evidence from a frequency-manipulated gating task.

Authors:  Elina Mainela-Arnold; Julia L Evans; Jeffry A Coady
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  The development of voicing categories: a quantitative review of over 40 years of infant speech perception research.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08
View more
  23 in total

1.  A real-time mechanism underlying lexical deficits in developmental language disorder: Between-word inhibition.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Jamie Klein-Packard; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

2.  Speech categorization develops slowly through adolescence.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ani Danelz; Hannah Rigler; Michael Seedorff
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-06-28

3.  How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Tyler P Ellis; Keith S Apfelbaum
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-09-14

5.  The pictures who shall not be named: Empirical support for benefits of preview in the Visual World Paradigm.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Jamie Klein-Packard; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Learning During Processing: Word Learning Doesn't Wait for Word Recognition to Finish.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-07-29

7.  Lexical Recognition in Deaf Children Learning American Sign Language: Activation of Semantic and Phonological Features of Signs.

Authors:  Amy M Lieberman; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  Lang Learn       Date:  2020-06-03

8.  Listeners can anticipate future segments before they identify the current one.

Authors:  Kayleen E Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Developmental Timescale of Rapid Adaptation to Conflicting Cues in Real-Time Sentence Processing.

Authors:  Angele Yazbec; Michael P Kaschak; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

10.  The encoding of word forms into memory may be challenging for college students with developmental language impairment.

Authors:  Karla McGregor; Tim Arbisi-Kelm; Nichole Eden
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.484

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.