Literature DB >> 24037243

TCPA: a resource for cancer functional proteomics data.

Jun Li1, Yiling Lu, Rehan Akbani, Zhenlin Ju, Paul L Roebuck, Wenbin Liu, Ji-Yeon Yang, Bradley M Broom, Roeland G W Verhaak, David W Kane, Chris Wakefield, John N Weinstein, Gordon B Mills, Han Liang.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24037243      PMCID: PMC4076789          DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN: 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Functional proteomics represents a powerful approach to understand the pathophysiology and therapy of cancer. However, comprehensive cancer proteomic data have been relatively limited. As a part of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Project and other efforts, we have generated protein expression data over a large number of tumor and cell line samples using reverse-phase protein arrays (RPPAs). RPPA is a quantitative, antibody-based technology that can assess multiple protein markers in many samples in a cost-effective, sensitive and high-throughput manner[1,2]. This technology has been extensively validated for both cell line and patient samples[3,4,5], and its applications range from building reproducible prognostic models[6] to generating experimentally verified mechanistic insights[7]. Our RPPA profiling platform includes extensively validated antibodies to nearly 200 proteins and phosphoproteins (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Table 1). We are in the process of extending it to 500 independent proteins, covering all major signaling pathways, including PI3K, MAPK, mTOR, TGF-β, WNT, cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA damage, Hippo and Notch pathways. The current data release covers 4,379 tumor samples and consists of three parts (Supplementary Table 2). These are (i) TCGA tumor tissue sample sets: 3,467 samples from 11 cancer types, to be extended to 25 cancer types; (ii) independent tumor tissue sample sets: one endometrial tumor set (244 samples)[7] and two ovarian tumor sets (99 and 130 samples, respectively)[6], with other independent sets to be added soon; and (iii) tumor cell lines: 439 samples in four cell line sets, including both baseline and drug-treated cell lines. To our knowledge, this represents the largest publicly available collection of cancer functional proteomics data with parallel DNA and RNA data. To facilitate broad access to these RPPA data sets, we developed a user-friendly data portal, The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA; http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/main/TCPA:Overview). TCPA provides six modules: Summary, My Protein, Download, Visualization, Analysis and Cell Line (Fig. 1, i). The Summary module provides an overview of the RPPA data with detailed descriptions of each set (Fig. 1, ii). The Download module allows users to obtain any RPPA data set for analysis through a tree-view interface (Fig. 1, iii). The My Protein module provides detailed information about each RPPA protein: protein name, corresponding gene symbol, antibody status and source for the antibody. Users can examine the expression pattern of a protein of interest across different tumor types (for example, HER2 expression shown in Fig. 1, iv).
Figure 1

Overview of the TCPA data portal.

TCPA contains six modules (i): the Summary module (ii); the Download module (iii); the My Protein module, which has a table view (iv); the Visualization module, which has a “next-generation clustered heat map” view (v) and network view (vi); the Analysis module, which offers correlation analysis (vii), differential analysis (viii) and survival analysis (ix); and the Cell Line module, which offers cell line–patient BLAST analysis (x) and drug treatment effect analysis (xi).

Overview of the TCPA data portal.

TCPA contains six modules (i): the Summary module (ii); the Download module (iii); the My Protein module, which has a table view (iv); the Visualization module, which has a “next-generation clustered heat map” view (v) and network view (vi); the Analysis module, which offers correlation analysis (vii), differential analysis (viii) and survival analysis (ix); and the Cell Line module, which offers cell line–patient BLAST analysis (x) and drug treatment effect analysis (xi). The Visualization module provides two ways to examine global protein expression patterns in a specific RPPA data set. One is through a “next-generation clustered heat map” (Fig. 1, v), which allows users to zoom, navigate and scrutinize clustering patterns of samples or proteins and link those patterns to relevant biological information sources. The other is through a network view (Fig. 1, vi), which overlays the correlation between any two interacting partners in the protein interaction network (curated in the Human Protein Reference Database[8]). The Analysis module provides three analysis methods. (i) For correlation analysis, given a user-specified data set, correlations between any pair of proteins are presented in a table (Fig. 1, vii). Users can search the results by protein name, rank correlations or visualize the scatter plot of a correlation of interest (for example, there is a strong correlation between PKC-α and its phosphorylated form PKC-a_pS657 in endometrial cancer, as shown in Fig. 1, vii). (ii) For differential analysis, differentially expressed protein markers between two tumor types or subtypes can be identified. Given user-defined comparison groups, the results are displayed in a table view, and for a protein of interest, users can visualize the box plots for the comparison (for example, the much higher expression of HER2 in the HER2-enriched subtype of breast cancer than in the basal-like subtype shown in Fig. 1, viii). (iii) For survival analysis, protein markers or pathway events significantly correlated with patient survival can be identified. The table view shows the univariate Cox proportional hazards model, log rank–test P values and a Kaplan-Meier plot for each protein in the data set (for example, phosphorylated MAPK, MEK, EGFR and YB are the top predictors of patient survival in ovarian cancer, which suggests a strong prognostic value of the tyrosine kinase receptor–RAS–MAPK pathway in this disease, as shown in Fig. 1, ix). The Cell Line module provides two analyses for RPPA data from tumor cell lines. (i) For cell line–patient BLAST, cell lines with RPPA profiles that are most similar to those of a patient sample of interest can be selected (Fig. 1, x). The returned cell lines are externally linked with Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE)[9], from which selected mutations, transcriptomic profiles and sensitivity to specific drug treatments can be obtained. (ii) For drug treatment analysis, drug effects on RPPA profiles are provided (Fig. 1, xi). Compared with other proteomic databases such as The Human Protein Atlas[10], an advantage of TCPA is the availability of quantitative protein expression data over large cohorts of well-characterized TCGA patient tumors, with linked DNA and RNA analyses. TCPA allows the validation of findings from TCGA RPPA data through independent sample cohorts and will help users select model tumor cell lines for further functional investigation. TCPA complements nucleic acid–centric cancer genomic data resources such as the CCLE, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center's cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics, OncoMine and the UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser. TCPA is also complementary to other protein-driven resources such as the Human Protein Reference Database, search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes/proteins (STRING) and Human Interactome Project. We will include additional data sets from TCGA and other independent cancer studies as they become available, and we will also accept (and help curate as necessary) cancer proteomic data from other groups. Author contributions G.B.M. and H.L. conceived of and supervised the project. Y.L., R.A., Z.J., W.L., J.-Y.Y., R.G.W.V. and J.L. generated the data, and J.L., P.L.R., B.M.B., D.W.K., C.W., J.N.W., G.B.M. and H.L. developed the data portal. Y.L., G.B.M. and H.L. wrote the manuscript with input from all the other authors.

Supplementary Table and Text

Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 53 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

The antibody list for TCGA RPPA datasets (XLSX 34 kb)

Supplementary Note

TCGA Consortium membership (XLSX 32 kb)
  9 in total

1.  Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas.

Authors:  Mathias Uhlen; Per Oksvold; Linn Fagerberg; Emma Lundberg; Kalle Jonasson; Mattias Forsberg; Martin Zwahlen; Caroline Kampf; Kenneth Wester; Sophia Hober; Henrik Wernerus; Lisa Björling; Fredrik Ponten
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Reverse-phase protein lysate microarrays for cell signaling analysis.

Authors:  Brett Spurrier; Sundhar Ramalingam; Satoshi Nishizuka
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Reverse phase protein array: validation of a novel proteomic technology and utility for analysis of primary leukemia specimens and hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Raoul Tibes; Yihua Qiu; Yiling Lu; Bryan Hennessy; Michael Andreeff; Gordon B Mills; Steven M Kornblau
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  A Technical Assessment of the Utility of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays for the Study of the Functional Proteome in Non-microdissected Human Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Bryan T Hennessy; Yiling Lu; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Mark S Carey; Simen Myhre; Zhenlin Ju; Michael A Davies; Wenbin Liu; Kevin Coombes; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Isabelle Bedrosian; Mollianne McGahren; Roshan Agarwal; Fan Zhang; Jens Overgaard; Jan Alsner; Richard M Neve; Wen-Lin Kuo; Joe W Gray; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.988

Review 5.  Use of reverse phase protein microarrays and reference standard development for molecular network analysis of metastatic ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Katherine M Sheehan; Valerie S Calvert; Elaine W Kay; Yiling Lu; David Fishman; Virginia Espina; Joy Aquino; Runa Speer; Robyn Araujo; Gordon B Mills; Lance A Liotta; Emanuel F Petricoin; Julia D Wulfkuhle
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Proteomic profiling of the NCI-60 cancer cell lines using new high-density reverse-phase lysate microarrays.

Authors:  Satoshi Nishizuka; Lu Charboneau; Lynn Young; Sylvia Major; William C Reinhold; Mark Waltham; Hosein Kouros-Mehr; Kimberly J Bussey; Jae K Lee; Virginia Espina; Peter J Munson; Emanuel Petricoin; Lance A Liotta; John N Weinstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Whole-exome sequencing combined with functional genomics reveals novel candidate driver cancer genes in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Han Liang; Lydia W T Cheung; Jie Li; Zhenlin Ju; Shuangxing Yu; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Turgut Dogruluk; Yiling Lu; Xiuping Liu; Chao Gu; Wei Guo; Steven E Scherer; Hannah Carter; Shannon N Westin; Mary D Dyer; Roeland G W Verhaak; Fan Zhang; Rachel Karchin; Chang-Gong Liu; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus; Kenneth L Scott; Bryan T Hennessy; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity.

Authors:  Jordi Barretina; Giordano Caponigro; Nicolas Stransky; Kavitha Venkatesan; Adam A Margolin; Sungjoon Kim; Christopher J Wilson; Joseph Lehár; Gregory V Kryukov; Dmitriy Sonkin; Anupama Reddy; Manway Liu; Lauren Murray; Michael F Berger; John E Monahan; Paula Morais; Jodi Meltzer; Adam Korejwa; Judit Jané-Valbuena; Felipa A Mapa; Joseph Thibault; Eva Bric-Furlong; Pichai Raman; Aaron Shipway; Ingo H Engels; Jill Cheng; Guoying K Yu; Jianjun Yu; Peter Aspesi; Melanie de Silva; Kalpana Jagtap; Michael D Jones; Li Wang; Charles Hatton; Emanuele Palescandolo; Supriya Gupta; Scott Mahan; Carrie Sougnez; Robert C Onofrio; Ted Liefeld; Laura MacConaill; Wendy Winckler; Michael Reich; Nanxin Li; Jill P Mesirov; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Kristin Ardlie; Vivien Chan; Vic E Myer; Barbara L Weber; Jeff Porter; Markus Warmuth; Peter Finan; Jennifer L Harris; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Michael P Morrissey; William R Sellers; Robert Schlegel; Levi A Garraway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Human Protein Reference Database--2009 update.

Authors:  T S Keshava Prasad; Renu Goel; Kumaran Kandasamy; Shivakumar Keerthikumar; Sameer Kumar; Suresh Mathivanan; Deepthi Telikicherla; Rajesh Raju; Beema Shafreen; Abhilash Venugopal; Lavanya Balakrishnan; Arivusudar Marimuthu; Sutopa Banerjee; Devi S Somanathan; Aimy Sebastian; Sandhya Rani; Somak Ray; C J Harrys Kishore; Sashi Kanth; Mukhtar Ahmed; Manoj K Kashyap; Riaz Mohmood; Y L Ramachandra; V Krishna; B Abdul Rahiman; Sujatha Mohan; Prathibha Ranganathan; Subhashri Ramabadran; Raghothama Chaerkady; Akhilesh Pandey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 16.971

  9 in total
  206 in total

1.  Computational Analyses Connect Small-Molecule Sensitivity to Cellular Features Using Large Panels of Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Matthew G Rees; Brinton Seashore-Ludlow; Paul A Clemons
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

2.  Systems-level Analysis Reveals Multiple Modulators of Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition and Identifies DNAJB4 and CD81 as Novel Metastasis Inducers in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Zeynep Cansu Uretmen Kagiali; Erdem Sanal; Özge Karayel; Ayse Nur Polat; Özge Saatci; Pelin Gülizar Ersan; Kathrin Trappe; Bernhard Y Renard; Tamer T Önder; Nurcan Tuncbag; Özgür Şahin; Nurhan Ozlu
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Characterization of Human Cancer Cell Lines by Reverse-phase Protein Arrays.

Authors:  Jun Li; Wei Zhao; Rehan Akbani; Wenbin Liu; Zhenlin Ju; Shiyun Ling; Christopher P Vellano; Paul Roebuck; Qinghua Yu; A Karina Eterovic; Lauren A Byers; Michael A Davies; Wanleng Deng; Y N Vashisht Gopal; Guo Chen; Erika M von Euw; Dennis Slamon; Dylan Conklin; John V Heymach; Adi F Gazdar; John D Minna; Jeffrey N Myers; Yiling Lu; Gordon B Mills; Han Liang
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  ACTL6A Is Co-Amplified with p63 in Squamous Cell Carcinoma to Drive YAP Activation, Regenerative Proliferation, and Poor Prognosis.

Authors:  Srinivas Vinod Saladi; Kenneth Ross; Mihriban Karaayvaz; Purushothama R Tata; Hongmei Mou; Jayaraj Rajagopal; Sridhar Ramaswamy; Leif W Ellisen
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Teaching an old dog new tricks: drug repositioning in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Lauren Averett Byers
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 39.397

6.  Src Inhibition Blocks c-Myc Translation and Glucose Metabolism to Prevent the Development of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shalini Jain; Xiao Wang; Chia-Chi Chang; Catherine Ibarra-Drendall; Hai Wang; Qingling Zhang; Samuel W Brady; Ping Li; Hong Zhao; Jessica Dobbs; Matt Kyrish; Tomasz S Tkaczyk; Adrian Ambrose; Christopher Sistrunk; Banu K Arun; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Wei Jia; Victoria L Seewaldt; Dihua Yu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Using reverse-phase protein arrays as pharmacodynamic assays for functional proteomics, biomarker discovery, and drug development in cancer.

Authors:  Yiling Lu; Shiyun Ling; Apurva M Hegde; Lauren A Byers; Kevin Coombes; Gordon B Mills; Rehan Akbani
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Chemoproteomic Profiling Uncovers CDK4-Mediated Phosphorylation of the Translational Suppressor 4E-BP1.

Authors:  Dylan C Mitchell; Arya Menon; Amanda L Garner
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 8.116

9.  Explicit representation of protein activity states significantly improves causal discovery of protein phosphorylation networks.

Authors:  Jinling Liu; Xiaojun Ma; Gregory F Cooper; Xinghua Lu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  e-MutPath: computational modeling reveals the functional landscape of genetic mutations rewiring interactome networks.

Authors:  Yongsheng Li; Brandon Burgman; Ishaani S Khatri; Sairahul R Pentaparthi; Zhe Su; Daniel J McGrail; Yang Li; Erxi Wu; S Gail Eckhardt; Nidhi Sahni; S Stephen Yi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.