Literature DB >> 27663479

Using reverse-phase protein arrays as pharmacodynamic assays for functional proteomics, biomarker discovery, and drug development in cancer.

Yiling Lu1, Shiyun Ling2, Apurva M Hegde2, Lauren A Byers3, Kevin Coombes4, Gordon B Mills1, Rehan Akbani5.   

Abstract

The majority of the targeted therapeutic agents in clinical use target proteins and protein function. Although DNA and RNA analyses have been used extensively to identify novel targets and patients likely to benefit from targeted therapies, these are indirect measures of the levels and functions of most therapeutic targets. More importantly, DNA and RNA analysis is ill-suited for determining the pharmacodynamic effects of target inhibition. Assessing changes in protein levels and function is the most efficient way to evaluate the mechanisms underlying sensitivity and resistance to targeted agents. Understanding these mechanisms is necessary to identify patients likely to benefit from treatment and to develop rational drug combinations to prevent or bypass therapeutic resistance. There is an urgent need for a robust approach to assess protein levels and protein function in model systems and across patient samples. While "shot gun" mass spectrometry can provide in-depth analysis of proteins across a limited number of samples, and emerging approaches such as multiple reaction monitoring have the potential to analyze candidate markers, mass spectrometry has not entered into general use because of the high cost, requirement of extensive analysis and support, and relatively large amount of material needed for analysis. Rather, antibody-based technologies, including immunohistochemistry, radioimmunoassays, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), and more recently protein arrays, remain the most common approaches for multiplexed protein analysis. Reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) technology has emerged as a robust, sensitive, cost-effective approach to the analysis of large numbers of samples for quantitative assessment of key members of functional pathways that are affected by tumor-targeting therapeutics. The RPPA platform is a powerful approach for identifying and validating targets, classifying tumor subsets, assessing pharmacodynamics, and identifying prognostic and predictive markers, adaptive responses and rational drug combinations in model systems and patient samples. Its greatest utility has been realized through integration with other analytic platforms such as DNA sequencing, transcriptional profiling, epigenomics, mass spectrometry, and metabolomics. The power of the technology is becoming apparent through its use in pathology laboratories and integration into trial design and implementation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Drug development; Pharmacodynamic; Proteomics; RPPA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27663479      PMCID: PMC5111873          DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2016.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  45 in total

1.  RPPanalyzer: Analysis of reverse-phase protein array data.

Authors:  Heiko A Mannsperger; Stephan Gade; Frauke Henjes; Tim Beissbarth; Ulrike Korf
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Evaluation of Protein Profiles From Treated Xenograft Tumor Models Identifies an Antibody Panel for Formalin-fixed and Paraffin-embedded (FFPE) Tissue Analysis by Reverse Phase Protein Arrays (RPPA).

Authors:  Sabine Bader; Magdalena Zajac; Thomas Friess; Elisabeth Ruge; Natascha Rieder; Berthold Gierke; Yvonne Heubach; Marlene Thomas; Michael Pawlak
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 3.  Use of reverse phase protein microarrays and reference standard development for molecular network analysis of metastatic ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Katherine M Sheehan; Valerie S Calvert; Elaine W Kay; Yiling Lu; David Fishman; Virginia Espina; Joy Aquino; Runa Speer; Robyn Araujo; Gordon B Mills; Lance A Liotta; Emanuel F Petricoin; Julia D Wulfkuhle
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Molecular analysis of HER2 signaling in human breast cancer by functional protein pathway activation mapping.

Authors:  Julia D Wulfkuhle; Daniela Berg; Claudia Wolff; Rupert Langer; Kai Tran; Julie Illi; Virginia Espina; Mariaelena Pierobon; Jianghong Deng; Angela DeMichele; Axel Walch; Holger Bronger; Ingrid Becker; Christine Waldhör; Heinz Höfler; Laura Esserman; Lance A Liotta; Karl-Friedrich Becker; Emanuel F Petricoin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  A novel derivative of the natural agent deguelin for cancer chemoprevention and therapy.

Authors:  Woo-Young Kim; Dong Jo Chang; Bryan Hennessy; Hae Jin Kang; Jakyung Yoo; Seung-Ho Han; Yoo-Shin Kim; Hyun-Ju Park; Seung-Yong Seo; Seung-Yong Geo; Gordon Mills; Kyu-Won Kim; Waun Ki Hong; Young-Ger Suh; Ho-Young Lee
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-12

6.  Glioblastoma cell enrichment is critical for analysis of phosphorylated drug targets and proteomic-genomic correlations.

Authors:  Claudius Mueller; Ana C deCarvalho; Tom Mikkelsen; Norman L Lehman; Valerie Calvert; Virginia Espina; Lance A Liotta; Emanuel F Petricoin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  A renewable tissue resource of phenotypically stable, biologically and ethnically diverse, patient-derived human breast cancer xenograft models.

Authors:  Xiaomei Zhang; Sofie Claerhout; Aleix Prat; Lacey E Dobrolecki; Ivana Petrovic; Qing Lai; Melissa D Landis; Lisa Wiechmann; Rachel Schiff; Mario Giuliano; Helen Wong; Suzanne W Fuqua; Alejandro Contreras; Carolina Gutierrez; Jian Huang; Sufeng Mao; Anne C Pavlick; Amber M Froehlich; Meng-Fen Wu; Anna Tsimelzon; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Edward S Chen; Pavel Zuloaga; Chad A Shaw; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Charles M Perou; Gordon B Mills; Jenny C Chang; Michael T Lewis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Widespread molecular patterns associated with drug sensitivity in breast cancer cell lines, with implications for human tumors.

Authors:  Chad J Creighton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessing the clinical utility of cancer genomic and proteomic data across tumor types.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Eliezer M Van Allen; Larsson Omberg; Nikhil Wagle; Ali Amin-Mansour; Artem Sokolov; Lauren A Byers; Yanxun Xu; Kenneth R Hess; Lixia Diao; Leng Han; Xuelin Huang; Michael S Lawrence; John N Weinstein; Josh M Stuart; Gordon B Mills; Levi A Garraway; Adam A Margolin; Gad Getz; Han Liang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  A pan-cancer proteomic perspective on The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Authors:  Rehan Akbani; Patrick Kwok Shing Ng; Henrica M J Werner; Maria Shahmoradgoli; Fan Zhang; Zhenlin Ju; Wenbin Liu; Ji-Yeon Yang; Kosuke Yoshihara; Jun Li; Shiyun Ling; Elena G Seviour; Prahlad T Ram; John D Minna; Lixia Diao; Pan Tong; John V Heymach; Steven M Hill; Frank Dondelinger; Nicolas Städler; Lauren A Byers; Funda Meric-Bernstam; John N Weinstein; Bradley M Broom; Roeland G W Verhaak; Han Liang; Sach Mukherjee; Yiling Lu; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  22 in total

1.  Therapeutic potential of FLANC, a novel primate-specific long non-coding RNA in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Martin Pichler; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Su Youn Nam; Mihnea Paul Dragomir; Recep Bayraktar; Simone Anfossi; Erik Knutsen; Cristina Ivan; Enrique Fuentes-Mattei; Sang Kil Lee; Hui Ling; Tina Catela Ivkovic; Guoliang Huang; Li Huang; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Hiroyuki Katayama; Ayumu Taguchi; Emine Bayraktar; Rajat Bhattacharya; Paola Amero; William Ruixian He; Anh M Tran; Petra Vychytilova-Faltejskova; Christiane Klec; Diana L Bonilla; Xinna Zhang; Sanja Kapitanovic; Bozo Loncar; Roberta Gafà; Zhihui Wang; Vittorio Cristini; Samir M Hanash; Menashe Bar-Eli; Giovanni Lanza; Ondrej Slaby; Ajay Goel; Isidore Rigoutsos; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; George Adrian Calin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Phospho Flow Cytometry with Fluorescent Cell Barcoding for Single Cell Signaling Analysis and Biomarker Discovery.

Authors:  Sigrid S Skånland
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  TCPA v3.0: An Integrative Platform to Explore the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Functional Proteomic Data.

Authors:  Mei-Ju May Chen; Jun Li; Yumeng Wang; Rehan Akbani; Yiling Lu; Gordon B Mills; Han Liang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 4.  Proteomics advances for precision therapy in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Marilyne Labrie; Nicholas D Kendsersky; Hongli Ma; Lydia Campbell; Jennifer Eng; Koei Chin; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.940

5.  Differences in Signaling Patterns on PI3K Inhibition Reveal Context Specificity in KRAS-Mutant Cancers.

Authors:  Adam Stewart; Elizabeth A Coker; Sebastian Pölsterl; Alexandros Georgiou; Anna R Minchom; Suzanne Carreira; David Cunningham; Mary Er O'Brien; Florence I Raynaud; Johann S de Bono; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Udai Banerji
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  The Prediction of a 3-Protein-Based Model on the Prognosis of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaoting Chen; Kaiyi Wong; Yixuan Li; Zhong Guan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 7.  Translating pharmacodynamic biomarkers from bench to bedside: analytical validation and fit-for-purpose studies to qualify multiplex immunofluorescent assays for use on clinical core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Allison Marrero; Scott Lawrence; Deborah Wilsker; Andrea Regier Voth; Robert J Kinders
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  TRIPODD: a Novel Fluorescence Imaging Platform for In Situ Quantification of Drug Distribution and Therapeutic Response.

Authors:  Nathan P McMahon; Allison Solanki; Lei G Wang; Antonio R Montaño; Jocelyn A Jones; Kimberley S Samkoe; Kenneth M Tichauer; Summer L Gibbs
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Protein Signature Predicts Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment With Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab in HER2-Negative Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Mads H Haugen; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Ingrid Hedenfalk; Øystein Garred; Elin Borgen; Niklas Loman; Thomas Hatschek; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Bjørn Naume; Gordon B Mills; Gunhild M Mælandsmo; Olav Engebraaten
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-01-28

10.  Fluorescent Imaging for In Situ Measurement of Drug Target Engagement and Cell Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Nathan P McMahon; Allison Solanki; Jocelyn Jones; Sunjong Kwon; Young-Hwan Chang; Koei Chin; Michel A Nederlof; Joe W Gray; Summer L Gibbs
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.