Literature DB >> 24037175

Comparison of 4D-microSPECT and microCT for murine cardiac function.

Nicholas T Befera1, Cristian T Badea, G Allan Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare a new generation of four-dimensional micro-single photon emission computed tomography (microSPECT) with microCT for the quantitative in vivo assessment of murine cardiac function. PROCEDURES: Four-dimensional isotropic cardiac images were acquired from anesthetized normal C57BL/6 mice with either microSPECT (n = 6) or microCT (n = 6). One additional mouse with myocardial infarction (MI) was scanned with both modalities. Prior to imaging, mice were injected with either technetium tetrofosmin for microSPECT or a liposomal blood pool contrast agent for microCT. Segmentation of the left ventricle (LV) was performed using Vitrea (Vital Images) software, to derive global and regional function.
RESULTS: Measures of global LV function between microSPECT and microCT groups were comparable (e.g., ejection fraction = 71 ± 6 % microSPECT and 68 ± 4 % microCT). Regional functional indices (wall motion, wall thickening, regional ejection fraction) were also similar for the two modalities. In the mouse with MI, microSPECT identified a large perfusion defect that was not evident with microCT.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower spatial resolution, microSPECT was comparable to microCT in the quantitative evaluation of cardiac function. MicroSPECT offers an advantage over microCT in the ability to evaluate simultaneously myocardial radiotracer distribution and function, simultaneously. MicroSPECT should be considered as an alternative to microCT and magnetic resonance for preclinical cardiac imaging in the mouse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24037175      PMCID: PMC4061569          DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0686-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  37 in total

1.  Pixel-based subsets for rapid multi-pinhole SPECT reconstruction.

Authors:  Woutjan Branderhorst; Brendan Vastenhouw; Freek J Beekman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Cardiovascular effects of treadmill exercise in physiological and pathological preclinical settings.

Authors:  Cinzia Perrino; Giuseppe Gargiulo; Gianluigi Pironti; Anna Franzone; Laura Scudiero; Mario De Laurentis; Fabio Magliulo; Federica Ilardi; Giuseppe Carotenuto; Gabriele Giacomo Schiattarella; Giovanni Esposito
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Heart failure and mouse models.

Authors:  Ross Breckenridge
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.758

4.  Cardiovascular phenotyping of the mouse heart using a 4D radial acquisition and liposomal Gd-DTPA-BMA.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bucholz; Ketan Ghaghada; Yi Qi; Srinivasan Mukundan; Howard A Rockman; G Allan Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Application of MOSFET detectors for dosimetry in small animal radiography using short exposure times.

Authors:  Ming De Lin; Greta Toncheva; Giao Nguyen; Sangroh Kim; Colin Anderson-Evans; G Allan Johnson; Terry T Yoshizumi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in mice using PET, compared with MRI.

Authors:  Lars Stegger; Edwin Heijman; Klaus P Schäfers; Klaas Nicolay; Michael A Schäfers; Gustav J Strijkers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  In vivo small-animal imaging using micro-CT and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  C T Badea; M Drangova; D W Holdsworth; G A Johnson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Animal models of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Carlos Zaragoza; Carmen Gomez-Guerrero; Jose Luis Martin-Ventura; Luis Blanco-Colio; Begoña Lavin; Beñat Mallavia; Carlos Tarin; Sebastian Mas; Alberto Ortiz; Jesus Egido
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-02-16

9.  Comparison of (semi-)automatic and manually adjusted measurements of left ventricular function in dual source computed tomography using three different software tools.

Authors:  G J de Jonge; P M A van Ooijen; J Overbosch; A Litcheva Gueorguieva; M C Janssen-van der Weide; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Small-animal SPECT and SPECT/CT: application in cardiovascular research.

Authors:  Reza Golestani; Chao Wu; René A Tio; Clark J Zeebregts; Artiom D Petrov; Freek J Beekman; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Hendrikus H Boersma; Riemer H J A Slart
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  4 in total

1.  Remodeling of alveolar septa after murine pneumonectomy.

Authors:  Alexandra B Ysasi; Willi L Wagner; Robert D Bennett; Maximilian Ackermann; Cristian D Valenzuela; Janeil Belle; Akira Tsuda; Moritz A Konerding; Steven J Mentzer
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.464

2.  U-SPECT-BioFluo: an integrated radionuclide, bioluminescence, and fluorescence imaging platform.

Authors:  Matthias N van Oosterom; Rob Kreuger; Tessa Buckle; Wendy A Mahn; Anton Bunschoten; Lee Josephson; Fijs Wb van Leeuwen; Freek J Beekman
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 3.138

3.  In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography.

Authors:  Elza van Deel; Yanto Ridwan; J Nicole van Vliet; Sasha Belenkov; Jeroen Essers
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Effect of different anesthetic agents on left ventricular systolic function assessed by echocardiography in hamsters.

Authors:  D M Tanaka; M M D Romano; E E V Carvalho; L F L Oliveira; H C D Souza; B C Maciel; H C Salgado; R Fazan-Júnior; M V Simões
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.590

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.