| Literature DB >> 21403831 |
Carlos Zaragoza1, Carmen Gomez-Guerrero, Jose Luis Martin-Ventura, Luis Blanco-Colio, Begoña Lavin, Beñat Mallavia, Carlos Tarin, Sebastian Mas, Alberto Ortiz, Jesus Egido.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are the first leading cause of death and morbidity in developed countries. The use of animal models have contributed to increase our knowledge, providing new approaches focused to improve the diagnostic and the treatment of these pathologies. Several models have been developed to address cardiovascular complications, including atherothrombotic and cardiac diseases, and the same pathology have been successfully recreated in different species, including small and big animal models of disease. However, genetic and environmental factors play a significant role in cardiovascular pathophysiology, making difficult to match a particular disease, with a single experimental model. Therefore, no exclusive method perfectly recreates the human complication, and depending on the model, additional considerations of cost, infrastructure, and the requirement for specialized personnel, should also have in mind. Considering all these facts, and depending on the budgets available, models should be selected that best reproduce the disease being investigated. Here we will describe models of atherothrombotic diseases, including expanding and occlusive animal models, as well as models of heart failure. Given the wide range of models available, today it is possible to devise the best strategy, which may help us to find more efficient and reliable solutions against human cardiovascular diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21403831 PMCID: PMC3042667 DOI: 10.1155/2011/497841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
Animal models of atherosclerosis: advantages and limitations.
| Mouse | (i) Rapid development of atherosclerotic plaques | (i) Only partial resemblance to humans |
| (ii) Short reproductive cycle | (ii) More atherosclerotic than atherothrombosis model | |
| (iii) Large litters | (iii) Very high levels of blood lipids | |
| (iv) Well-known genome | ||
| (v) Relative ease of genome manipulation | ||
| (vi) Relatively cheap | ||
| (vii) Useful for noninvasive imaging | ||
| (MRI, PET, CT, ultrasound) | ||
| (viii) Large experience | ||
| Rat | (i) Easy, available, and cheap | (i) Do not develop atheroma |
| (ii) Useful for restenosis analysis | ||
| Rabbit | (i) Medium size | (i) Need for high blood cholesterol levels |
| (ii) Fibroatheroma lesions | (ii) No plaque rupture model | |
| (iii) Useful for restenosis models | (iii) A model of neointima formation rather than atherosclerosis | |
| (iv) Affordable | ||
| Porcine | (i) Lesions more similar to human disease | (i) High cost |
| (ii) Valid for restenosis studies | (ii) Difficult handling | |
| (iii) Few genomic tools | ||
Animal models of plaque rupture and plaque associated thrombosis.
| Spontaneous | Induced |
|---|---|
| 39–54-month-old pigs with inherited hyper=LDL cholesterolemia. | ApoE−/− mice after squeezing the aorta supplemented between forceps. |
| 42–54-week old ApoE−/− mice. | Hypercholesterolemic rabbits subjected to balloon injury. |
| Dahl salt-sensitive hypertensive transgenic rats for human cholesteryl ester transfer protein. | Atherosclerotic ApoE−/− mice subjected to photochemical injury. |
| — | Intraperitoneal injection of Russell's viper venom in New Zealand White rabbits intermittently fed with high cholesterol diet. |
| Intraperitoneal injection of Russel's viper venom in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits, in combination with the administration of serotonin or angiotensin II. | |
Current procedures for inducing AAA in animals.
| Species | AAA models |
|---|---|
| Murine | |
| Rabbit | |
| Pig | |
Current procedures for inducing heart damage in animals.
| Species | Heart failure models |
|---|---|
| Murine | |
| Rabbit | |
| Dog | |
| Pig | |