| Literature DB >> 24032100 |
Sung Won Cho1, Dong Hwi Kim, Gwang Chul Lee, Sang Hong Lee, Sang Ha Park.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the radiographic and clinical results of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) using autogenous bone graft and allogenous cancellous bone graft for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with two-year follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: Bone graft; High tibial osteotomy; Knee; Medial compartment; Osteoarthritis
Year: 2013 PMID: 24032100 PMCID: PMC3767897 DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.3.117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Relat Res ISSN: 2234-0726
Demographic Data of the Patients
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). p-value<0.05.
Fig. 1Surgical technique. (A) A guide pin was placed from the superomedial portion of the tibial tuberosity to the fibular head approximately 1 cm below the lateral articular margin of the tibia. (B) Osteotomy was advanced with an osteotome to 5 mm medial to the lateral cortex. (C) Two osteotomes were placed in the osteotomy site to spread the osteotomy site without collapsing cutting surface and making intra-articular fracture and lateral hinge tears. (D) The medial tibia was fixed with a Puddu plate.
Result of Autogenous Bone Graft Group and Allogenous Bone Graft Group
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). p-value<0.05.
OAT: osteochondral autograft transplantation.
Fig. 2Preoperative correction angle (A), mechanical femorotibial angle and anatomical femorotibial angle (B), modified tibial bone varus angle (C), and posterior tibial slope (D) were measured on radiographs.
Fig. 3(A) The preoperative standing whole leg anteroposterior (AP) radiograph obtained in a 67-year-old woman shows the mechanical femorotibial angle is 5.8° varus. (B) The AP radiograph obtained 8 weeks after open wedge high tibial osteotomy using a 10.0-mm Puddu plate with allogenous bone chip (15 mL) shows the mechanical femorotibial angle is 4.8° valgus. (C) The AP radiograph obtained 25 months postoperatively shows the mechanical femorotibial angle is 4.9° valgus.
The Result of Radiologic Assessment
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. p-value<0.05.
Negative (-) value means varus angle and positive (+) value means valgus angle.
FTA: femorotibial angle.
The Result of Clinical Assessment
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. p-value<0.05.