Francesco Luceri1,2,3, Mattia Basilico4, Cécile Batailler5, Pietro Simone Randelli6,7, Giuseppe Maria Peretti8,9, Elvire Servien5,10, Sébastien Lustig5,11. 1. Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix Rousse Hospital, Civil Hospices of Lyon, 103 Boulevard de la Croix Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France. f.luceri88@gmail.com. 2. IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, Italy. f.luceri88@gmail.com. 3. University of Milan, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy. f.luceri88@gmail.com. 4. Catholic University of the Sacred Heart School of Medicine, L.go A. Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy. 5. Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix Rousse Hospital, Civil Hospices of Lyon, 103 Boulevard de la Croix Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France. 6. U.O.C. 1a Divisione, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy. 7. Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Laboratorio di Biomeccanica Applicata, University of Milan, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy. 8. IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. 9. Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. 10. LIBM, EA 7424, Interuniversity Laboratory of Biology of Mobility, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France. 11. LBMC UMR T 9406, Laboratory of Chock Mechanics and Biomechanics, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiographic effect of sagittal tibial osteotomy (STO), flexion tibial osteotomy (FTO) and deflexion tibial osteotomy (DTO) around the knee. It has been hypothesized that proximal STO modifies patellar height and could cause varus/valgus changes of the anatomical tibial axis: The purpose of the study was to verify this and to analyse these modifications. METHOD: Patients underwent proximal STO in our department between 2007 and 2018: overall 28 consecutive patients (19 males, 9 females; 28 knees). Twelve patients underwent DTO, and 16 patients underwent FTO. Two independent observers measured the pre-operative and post-operative radiological indexes: posterior tibial slope, Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI) and Modified Insall-Salvati Index (MISI) in the lateral views; medial Tibial Plateau-Tibial Shaft (mTPTS) and medial Femoral Shaft-Tibial Shaft (mFTA) anatomical angles were measured in the frontal plane. RESULTS: No complications were reported at the average follow-up of 1.6 ± 1.1 years. The mean mTPTS significantly increased from 0.6° ± 2.4° pre-operatively to 2.9° ± 2.6° of varus post-operatively (DTO (pre-operative 0.3 ± 3.1°, post-operative 2.4 ± 2.1°, ns); FTO (pre-operative 0.9 ± 1.9°, post-operative 3.2 ± 3.0°, P < 0.05)). The mean mFTA significantly reduced from 186.2° ± 4.9° pre-operatively to 182.7° ± 3.9° post-operatively (DTO (pre-operative 183.4 ± 3.3°, post-operative 180.6 ± 3.5°, ns); FTO (pre-operative 188.5 ± 4.9°, post-operative 184.4 ± 3.4°, P < 0.05)). The overall analysis reported no differences statistically significant in patellar height indexes. DISCUSSION: The main finding of this study is that STO slightly modifies tibial anatomical axes. This finding is more evident in FTOs. This surgical technique, due to its design, does not influence the patellar height. The tibial tuberosity osteotomy, performed in most of the cases to better expose tibial metaphysis and to avoid patellar tendon damages, provides another benefit that is the possibility to easily preserve the native patellar height. CONCLUSION: Sagittal tibial osteotomies slightly modify tibial anatomical axes in frontal plan without influencing the patellar height. This surgical procedure resulted to be effective and reliable in correcting the sagittal knee alignment but reporting, particularly of FTO, varus changes of anatomical tibial axis.
AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiographic effect of sagittal tibial osteotomy (STO), flexion tibial osteotomy (FTO) and deflexion tibial osteotomy (DTO) around the knee. It has been hypothesized that proximal STO modifies patellar height and could cause varus/valgus changes of the anatomical tibial axis: The purpose of the study was to verify this and to analyse these modifications. METHOD:Patients underwent proximal STO in our department between 2007 and 2018: overall 28 consecutive patients (19 males, 9 females; 28 knees). Twelve patients underwent DTO, and 16 patients underwent FTO. Two independent observers measured the pre-operative and post-operative radiological indexes: posterior tibial slope, Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI) and Modified Insall-Salvati Index (MISI) in the lateral views; medial Tibial Plateau-Tibial Shaft (mTPTS) and medial Femoral Shaft-Tibial Shaft (mFTA) anatomical angles were measured in the frontal plane. RESULTS: No complications were reported at the average follow-up of 1.6 ± 1.1 years. The mean mTPTS significantly increased from 0.6° ± 2.4° pre-operatively to 2.9° ± 2.6° of varus post-operatively (DTO (pre-operative 0.3 ± 3.1°, post-operative 2.4 ± 2.1°, ns); FTO (pre-operative 0.9 ± 1.9°, post-operative 3.2 ± 3.0°, P < 0.05)). The mean mFTA significantly reduced from 186.2° ± 4.9° pre-operatively to 182.7° ± 3.9° post-operatively (DTO (pre-operative 183.4 ± 3.3°, post-operative 180.6 ± 3.5°, ns); FTO (pre-operative 188.5 ± 4.9°, post-operative 184.4 ± 3.4°, P < 0.05)). The overall analysis reported no differences statistically significant in patellar height indexes. DISCUSSION: The main finding of this study is that STO slightly modifies tibial anatomical axes. This finding is more evident in FTOs. This surgical technique, due to its design, does not influence the patellar height. The tibial tuberosity osteotomy, performed in most of the cases to better expose tibial metaphysis and to avoid patellar tendon damages, provides another benefit that is the possibility to easily preserve the native patellar height. CONCLUSION: Sagittal tibial osteotomies slightly modify tibial anatomical axes in frontal plan without influencing the patellar height. This surgical procedure resulted to be effective and reliable in correcting the sagittal knee alignment but reporting, particularly of FTO, varus changes of anatomical tibial axis.
Authors: J Robert Giffin; Tracy M Vogrin; Thore Zantop; Savio L Y Woo; Christopher D Harner Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: A Ducat; E Sariali; B Lebel; P Mertl; P Hernigou; X Flecher; R Zayni; M Bonnin; R Jalil; J Amzallag; P Rosset; E Servien; F Gaudot; T Judet; Y Catonné Journal: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 2.256
Authors: Alberto Grassi; Luca Macchiarola; Francisco Urrizola Barrientos; Juan Pablo Zicaro; Matias Costa Paz; Paolo Adravanti; Francesco Dini; Stefano Zaffagnini Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Stefan Hinterwimmer; Knut Beitzel; Jochen Paul; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Martin Sauerschnig; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Andreas B Imhoff Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Stefan Mogos; Mathieu Thaunat; Pooler Archbold; Jean-Marie Fayard; Benjamin Freychet; Julien Clechet; Pierre Chambat Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 6.202