| Literature DB >> 24031380 |
Bianca Caroline Rossi-Rodrigues1, Márcia Regina Brochetto-Braga, Sâmia Maria Tauk-Tornisielo, Eleonora Cano Carmona, Valeska Marques Arruda, José Chaud Netto.
Abstract
Trichoderma is one of the fungi genera that produce important metabolites for industry. The growth of these organisms is a consequence of the nutritional sources used as also of the physical conditions employed to cultivate them. In this work, the automated Bioscreen C system was used to evaluate the influence of different nutritional sources on the growth of Trichoderma strains (T. hamatum, T. harzianum, T. viride, and T. longibrachiatum) isolated from the soil in the Juréia-Itatins Ecological Station (JIES), São Paulo State - Brazil. The cultures were grown in liquid culture media containing different carbon- (2%; w/v) and nitrogen (1%; w/v) sources at 28ºC, pH 6.5, and agitated at 150 rpm for 72 h. The results showed, as expected, that glucose is superior to sucrose as a growth-stimulating carbon source in the Trichoderma strains studied, while yeast extract and tryptone were good growth-stimulating nitrogen sources in the cultivation of T. hamatum and T. harzianum.Entities:
Keywords: Bioscreen C system; Trichoderma; growth; tryptone; yeast extract
Year: 2009 PMID: 24031380 PMCID: PMC3769723 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220090002000035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Growth curves (O.D. 540 nm) of T. hamatum, T. longibrachiatum, T. viride, and T. harzianum in medium containing tryptone and glucose (a) or tryptone and sucrose (b) incubated at 28ºC from 0 until 72 h in an automated Bioscreen C system.
Figure 2Growth curves (O.D. 540nm) of T. hamatum, T. longibrachiatum, T. viride, and T. harzianum in medium containing yeast extract and glucose (a) or yeast extract and sucrose (b) incubated at 28ºC from 0 until 72 h in an automated Bioscreen C system.
Growth differences of the strains for culture periods in different culture media. The z values were obtained from variance analysis (Kruskal-Wallis test) and confirmed by Dunn post hoc test (BioEstat 4.0 software).
| 2.010 | 2.082 | 1.759 | 1.561 | 0.215 | 1.525 | 0.628 | 0.969 | 2.737 | 2.261 | 0.431 | 1.400 | 2.530 | 1.323 | 1.346 | 1.454 | |
| 2.279 | 2.602 | 2.800 | 2.288 | 2.333 | 2.665 | 2.351 | 2.118 | 2.315 | 2.225 | 1.507 | 1.454 | |||||
| 0.906 | 0.197 | 0.843 | 1.238 | 2.073 | 1.310 | 1.705 | 1.696 | 0.386 | 0.144 | 1.884 | 1.481 | 1.166 | 0.897 | |||
| 2.271 | 2.279 | 2.602 | 2.800 | 2.279 | 2.082 | 0.332 | 2.764 | |||||||||
| 2.468 | 1.606 | |||||||||||||||
| 2.216 | 2.082 | 1.759 | 1.561 | 1.220 | 1.525 | 1.561 | 1.454 | 2.665 | 2.225 | 1.507 | 1.454 | 0.834 | 1.866 | 1.454 | 1.454 | |
| 1.561 | 2.737 | 1.992 | 1.750 | |||||||||||||
| 0.655 | 1.454 | 1.454 | 1.454 | 1.516 | 1.454 | 1.454 | 1.454 | 0.673 | 1.472 | 1.454 | 1.454 | 2.584 | 1.454 | 1.454 | 1.454 | |
Criptical z value for p is 2.807
z values in bold are significant (p<0.05)
R-values of each strain obtained from variance analysis (Kruskal-Wallis test) confirmed by Dunn post hoc test (BioEstat 4.0 software).
| 369 | 369 | 369 | 369 | 330 | 369 | 343 | 355.5 | 368 | 369 | 339 | 367.5 | 369 | 354 | 291 | 288 | |
| 257 | 253 | 271 | 282 | 318 | 284 | 308 | 301.5 | 215.5 | 243 | 315 | 289.5 | 228 | 228 | 366 | 369 | |
| 206.5 | 242 | 224 | 213 | 202.5 | 211 | 213 | 207 | 237 | 251 | 210 | 207 | 163 | 230 | 207 | 207 | |
| 83.5 | 126 | 126 | 126 | 134.5 | 126 | 126 | 126 | 88.5 | 127 | 126 | 126 | 209.5 | 126 | 126 | 126 | |