Literature DB >> 22566120

Optimization of conditions for in vitro development of Trichoderma viride-based biofilms as potential inoculants.

Sodimalla Triveni1, Radha Prasanna, Anil Kumar Saxena.   

Abstract

Biofilms represent mixed communities present in a diverse range of environments; however, their utility as inoculants is less investigated. Our investigation was aimed towards in vitro development of biofilms using fungal mycelia (Trichoderma viride) as matrices and nitrogen-fixing and P-solubilizing bacteria as partners, as a prelude to their use as biofertilizers (biofilmed biofertilizers, BBs) and biocontrol agents for different crops. The most suitable media in terms of population counts, fresh mass and dry biomass for Trichoderma and Bacillus subtilis/Pseudomonas fluorescens was found to be Pikovskaya broth ± 1 % CaCO(3), while for Trichoderma and Azotobacter chroococcum, Jensen's medium was most optimal. The respective media were then used for optimization of the inoculation rate of the partners in terms of sequence of addition of partners, fresh/dry mass of biofilms and population counts of partners for efficient film formation. Microscopic observations revealed significant differences in the progress of growth of biofilms and dual cultures. In the biofilms, the bacteria were observed growing intermingled within the fungal mycelia mat. Further, biofilm formation was compared under static and shaking conditions and the fresh mass of biofilms was higher in the former. Such biofilms are being further characterized under in vitro conditions, before using them as inoculants with crops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22566120     DOI: 10.1007/s12223-012-0154-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)        ISSN: 0015-5632            Impact factor:   2.099


  20 in total

Review 1.  Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas.

Authors:  B J Lugtenberg; L Dekkers; G V Bloemberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 13.078

Review 2.  Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms.

Authors:  P S Stewart; J W Costerton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Biofilms 2003: emerging themes and challenges in studies of surface-associated microbial life.

Authors:  Matthew R Parsek; Clay Fuqua
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria.

Authors:  M Lucy; E Reed; Bernard R Glick
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 6.  Biofilms: the matrix revisited.

Authors:  Steven S Branda; Shild Vik; Lisa Friedman; Roberto Kolter
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 7.  Fungal--bacterial interactions: a mixed bag of mingling microbes.

Authors:  Matthew J Wargo; Deborah A Hogan
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  Improving biological control by combining biocontrol agents each with several mechanisms of disease suppression.

Authors:  Ruth Guetsky; D Shtienberg; Y Elad; E Fischer; A Dinoor
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 9.  Mechanisms that promote bacterial fitness in fungal-affected soil microhabitats.

Authors:  Rashid Nazir; Jan A Warmink; Hidde Boersma; Jan Dirk van Elsas
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 4.194

10.  Type IV pili are involved in plant-microbe and fungus-microbe interactions.

Authors:  J Dörr; T Hurek; B Reinhold-Hurek
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  6 in total

1.  Development of Mesorhizobium ciceri-Based Biofilms and Analyses of Their Antifungal and Plant Growth Promoting Activity in Chickpea Challenged by Fusarium Wilt.

Authors:  Krishnashis Das; Mahendra Vikram Singh Rajawat; Anil Kumar Saxena; Radha Prasanna
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  Microbial inoculants as plant growth stimulating and soil nutrient availability enhancing options for cucumber under protected cultivation.

Authors:  Kaur Simranjit; Amrita Kanchan; Radha Prasanna; Kunal Ranjan; Balasubramanian Ramakrishnan; Awani Kumar Singh; Yashbir Singh Shivay
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Should the biofilm mode of life be taken into consideration for microbial biocontrol agents?

Authors:  Caroline Pandin; Dominique Le Coq; Alexis Canette; Stéphane Aymerich; Romain Briandet
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 5.813

Review 4.  Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria: Context, Mechanisms of Action, and Roadmap to Commercialization of Biostimulants for Sustainable Agriculture.

Authors:  Rachel Backer; J Stefan Rokem; Gayathri Ilangumaran; John Lamont; Dana Praslickova; Emily Ricci; Sowmyalakshmi Subramanian; Donald L Smith
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Biological Control of Chili Damping-Off Disease, Caused by Pythium myriotylum.

Authors:  Sajjad Hyder; Amjad Shahzad Gondal; Zarrin Fatima Rizvi; Rashida Atiq; Muhammad Irtaza Sajjad Haider; Nida Fatima; Muhammad Inam-Ul-Haq
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Characterization of native plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their anti-oomycete potential against Phytophthora capsici affecting chilli pepper (Capsicum annum L.).

Authors:  Sajjad Hyder; Amjad Shahzad Gondal; Zarrin Fatima Rizvi; Raees Ahmad; Muhammad Mohsin Alam; Abdul Hannan; Waqas Ahmed; Nida Fatima; M Inam-Ul-Haq
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.