Literature DB >> 24031254

Isolation and characterization of Leptospira interrogans from pigs slaughtered in São Paulo State, Brazil.

Fabiana Miraglia1, Andréa Mike Moreno, Cleise Ribeiro Gomes, Renata Paixão, Esequiel Liuson, Zenaide Maria Morais, Paulo Maiorka, Fabiana Kömmling Seixas, Odir Antonio Dellagostin, Silvio Arruda Vasconcellos.   

Abstract

With the aim of isolating Leptospira spp., blood serum, kidney, liver and genital tract of 137 female swine (40 sows and 97 gilts) and also urine samples from 22 sows were collected in a slaughterhouse in the State of São Paulo, from April 2003 to August 2004. Four isolates were obtained from animals that presented microagglutination test (MAT) titers ≥ 100 for the serovar Pomona and one was obtained from an animal negative by MAT in which Leptospira was isolated from the liver and reproductive tract. The presence of leptospiral DNA was investigated by PCR, and positive results were found in kidneys of 11 females, liver of two, genital tract of two and urine of one of them. Nephrosis, interstitial multifocal nephritis, moderate to severe changing, hyalines cylinders and hemorrhagic focuses, hepatic and uterine horns congestion were histological lesions observed in higher frequency in animals positive for leptospira. The silver impregnation (Warthin Starry) confirmed the presence of spirochetes in renal tubules of four females with positive leptospira cultures from kidneys. The serogroup of the five isolates was identified as Pomona by cross agglutination with reference polyclonal antibodies. Molecular characterization of the isolates was carried out by variable-number tandem-repeats analysis. All the isolates revealed a pattern distinct from the L. interrogans Pomona type strain, but identical to a previously identified pattern from strains isolated in Argentina belonging to serovar Pomona.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Culture; Genital Tract; PCR; Pomona; Swine; VNTR

Year:  2008        PMID: 24031254      PMCID: PMC3768438          DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220080003000017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Microbiol        ISSN: 1517-8382            Impact factor:   2.476


INTRODUCTION

Pigs are one of the most important sources of leptospirosis infection for man and other domesticated animal species. Frequently, swine do not show signs of infection but shed large amounts of leptospires in their urine for periods of up to one year following infection (13,24–26,28,36). Pomona, Tarassovi, Canicola and Bratislava serovars of Leptospira interrogans and L. borgpetersenii have been isolated from pigs in different countries. Until now the serovars isolated from genital tract of swine were Bratislava and München (7–11). Leptospires have been frequently recovered from aborted fetuses, stillborn and weakly born piglets in several countries (51), however in Brazil, the number of studies with isolation of leptospires from swine are scarce (18,42,49,51). In recent years, direct diagnosis of leptospirosis has been facilitated by the use of molecular techniques such as PCR from urine samples, semen and organs of suspected animals (17,26,46,61), however, in spite of presenting high sensitivity and specificity when compared to the bacterial isolation, the indirect diagnosis by demonstration of antibodies against Leptospira by MAT is still the most frequently used method. Histopathology by the hematoxilin-eosin and Warthin-Starry staining has been used to demonstrate leptospires and structural lesions in affected organs, although there is no association between them, as the lesions are usually non specific (5,42,48,53, 56). After isolation in appropriate culture media, the bacterium must be characterized by serological methods for serogroup and serovar determination (6,31). More recently, a molecular typing method was developed and used to characterize L. interrogans strains at serovar level (33). This method is based on the analysis by PCR of variable-number tandem repeats (VNTR), using seven loci (VNTR 4, VNTR 7, VNTR 9, VNTR 10, VNTR 11, VNTR 19 and VNTR 23). Pavan et al. (43) used six of these VNTR loci to examine 16 strains of L. interrogans serovar Pomona isolated from animals and humans in Argentina, and their strains were classified as a genotype genetically distinct from the reference strain. The aim of this investigation was to isolate Leptospira spp. and to correlate MAT results with the demonstration of leptospires and lesions in kidneys, liver and genital tract of apparently healthy female swine. The leptospiral isolates obtained in this study were characterized by cross agglutination with polyclonal antibodies and by VNTR analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and Materials Collected

One hundred and thirty seven female swine (40 sows and 97 gilts) were allocated into 11 groups identified by letters A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J e K. The samples were collected from April 2003 to August 2004, in a slaughterhouse located in São Paulo State, Brazil.

Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT)

MAT (4,16) was performed firstly in the 1:100 screening dilution with 24 live reference serovars: Australis, Bratislava, Autumnalis, Butembo, Castellonis, Batavie, Canicola, Whitcombi, Cynopteri, Grippotyphosa, Hebdomadis, Copenhageni, Icterohaemorragiae, Javanica, Panama, Pomona, Pyrogenes, Hardjoprajitino, Wolffi, Shermani, Tarassovi, Andamana, Patoc e Sentot. The second step was the titration of the positive samples by two fold dilutions. After 2–4 h of incubation (28 to 30°C), the titers were determined as the reciprocal of the highest dilution presenting 50% of agglutination.

Isolation of Leptospires

Samples of 10 g of kidneys, liver, uterus, oviducts and ovaries were collected and homogenized in 50 mL of Sorensen saline (48). One hundred microliters of 10−1, 10−2 and 10−3 dilutions were inoculated into culture tubes in duplicates containing modified EMJH medium (DIFCO/USA) (1) enriched with 15% rabbit serum, 5-fluorouracil and nalidixic acid, according to Miraglia et al. (37). For urine samples, after collection (22 sows), the urine was diluted in Sorensen solution and 100 μL of 10−1, 10−2 and 10−3 dilutions (48), were inoculated into culture tubes in duplicate (37). The cultures were checked once a week over 4–6 months.

PCR Analysis

A 10% tissue suspensions (w/v) and urine samples (v/v) were prepared by homogenization in Sorensen solution (48). For DNA extraction, 400 μL of TE (Tris-HCl 10 mM, EDTA 1 mM, pH 8.0) were added to 200 μL of the tissue suspension. The suspension was homogenized for 10 sec and centrifuged at 13000 × g for 5 min. The pellet was suspended in 400 μL of TE buffer, vortexed and boiled for 15 min. The suspension was purified by mixing an equal volume of saturated phenol and vortexing for three min. After centrifugation at 13000 × g for 5 min, the upper phase was carefully transferred to another microtube and extracted with a half volume of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1), followed by ethanol precipitation. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation, dried and then resuspended in 30 μL of TE buffer and stored at -20°C until used for DNA amplification. The primer set used was that proposed by Mérien et al. (19), corresponding to nucleotides 38 to 57 (5' GGCGGCGCGTCTTAAACATG 3') and 369 to 348 (5' TTAGAACGAAGTTACCCCCCTT 3') of the 16S rRNA gene. DNA amplification was carried out in a total of 50 μL containing 1 x PCR buffer, 200 mM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 25 pmol of each primer, 2.5 U of Taq DNA Polymerasas and 10 μL of extracted DNA. Amplifications were performed in a thermocycler with an initial denaturation step at 94°C (3 min), followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C (1 min), annealing at 60°C (1 min) and extension at 72°C (1 min). L. interrogans pure cultures were used as positive control. Negative control tissue suspensions were collected from a non-inoculated hamster. The specific amplicon of 330 bp fragment was visualized after electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel in the presence of ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/mL).

Histopathology (Staining Methods)

The tissues were examined histologically by Warthin-Starry and Hematoxilin-eosin staining methods (38,60).

Serological Identification

Serogroup identification of the isolates was carried out by cross agglutination technique described by Faine (13). The preparation of rabbit antiserum was performed using two animals for each isolate. Rabbits weighing 3–4 kg were injected intravenously at weekly intervals with live bacteria (density of 2×108/mL) in doses of one, two, four, six and six milliliters, respectively. One week after the last injection the MAT titer from rabbit serum was found to be at least 12800. The rabbits were bled by cardiac puncture two weeks after the last injection. The cross agglutination was performed between isolates and reference polyclonal antibodies (representative recognized serogroups) from Budesinstitut für Gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschultz und Veterinäermedizin (bgvv) – Berlin/ Germany: Australis, Bratislava, Autumnalis, Castellonis, Batavie, Canicola, Cynopteri, Grippotyphosa, Hebdomadis, Copenhageni, Javanica, Panama, Pomona, Pyrogenes, Hardjoprajitino, Wolffi, Tarassovi and Patoc. Twenty-four live reference serovars were also used: Australis, Bratislava, Autumnalis, Butembo, Castellonis, Batavie, Canicola, Whitcombi, Cynopteri, Grippotyphosa, Hebdomadis, Copenhageni, Icterohaemorragiae, Javanica, Panama, Pomona, Pyrogenes, Hardjoprajitino, Wolffi, Shermani, Tarassovi, Andamana, Patoc and Sentot.

Molecular Typing

The molecular characterization of the isolates was performed by VNTR analysis with seven discriminatory markers (VNTR4, VNTR7, VNTR9, VNTR10, VNTR11, VNTR19 and VNTR23), using the primers described by Majed et al. (33). Genomic DNA was extracted using the GFX Genomic Blood DNA Purification Kit following the protocol for Gramnegative bacteria recommended by the manufacturer (GE healthcare). The extracted DNA was submitted to 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis in order to quantify and evaluate its integrity, and stored at – 20°C. Amplification was achieved with Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), using one cycle of denaturation (94°C for 5 min) followed by 35 cycles of amplification consisting of denaturation (94°C for 30 sec), annealing (55°C for 30 sec), and extension (72°C for 1 min 30 sec) and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The amplified products were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The size of the amplified products was estimated by comparison with a 50 bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Attempts to isolate Leptospira spp. from 137 apparently healthy pigs slaughtered in São Paulo, resulted in five positive cultures (3.5%) from two collection dates (groups G and K -gilts) (Table 1). PCR analysis revealed positive reaction from 11 kidneys, two livers, two genital tracts and from urine of one animal (Table 2). PCR failed to detect the presence of leptospiral DNA at more than one organ from the same animal. There was a positive correlation (P<0.05) between culture positive and PCR positive from renal tissue, determined by Mc Nemar’s test (55). As expected, PCR analysis was more sensitive (11/137) than culture (4/137), similar to what was found by other authors (11, 37,52,53). The analysis of agreement adjusted (kappa indicator) (58), when it was compared the direct methods of leptospire´s research (PCR e cultivo), showed low agreement between PCR and culture from kidney (k=0.27), liver (k=0.00), reproductive tract (k = - 48.65) and urine (k=0.00).
Table 1

Number of samples obtained from female pigs according SAM≥100, to the groups and number of leptospira isolations.

GroupsMAT Results according female swine1Positive Isolates
SowsGiltsGilts
A06/0800/0000/08
B06/1000/0000/10
C00/0100/0000/01
D02/0400/0000/04
E00/0002/1500/15
F01/0804/0600/14
G00/0014/1502/15
H03/0901/0600/15
I00/0000/1500/15
J00/005/2500/25
K00/0010/1503/15
Subtotal18/40 (45,0%)36/97 (37,1%)
Total54/137 (39,4%)05/137 (3,6%)

positive female/examinated.

Table 2

Number of pigs with positive PCR for leptospires according to groups and kind of material examined.

Number of pigs with PCR positive
GroupsKidneyLiverGenital tractUrine
A0000/3
B0010/8
C0000/1
D0011/1
E020
F2000/4
G900
H0000/5
I000
J000
K000
Total*11/1372/1372/1371/22
(8.0%)(1.46%)(1.46%)(4.5%)

not done/ not collected - absent urine;

number of pigs with positive PCR for leptospira/number of pigs examined.

Number of samples obtained from female pigs according SAM≥100, to the groups and number of leptospira isolations. positive female/examinated. Number of pigs with positive PCR for leptospires according to groups and kind of material examined. not done/ not collected - absent urine; number of pigs with positive PCR for leptospira/number of pigs examined. MAT, the standard method of serologic diagnosis of leptospirosis, revealed seropositivity with titers ≥ 100 of 39.4% of the animals, 45.0% of sows and 37.1% of gilts (Table 1). It was expected to find a higher number of reactors by MAT as the immune response persists long after the bacteria have been cleared from the organism. Four out of five culture positive animals for Leptospira showed high titers for the Pomona serovar (Table 3). The animal that was culture positive, but had no antibodies against leptospira and no lesions was probably recently infected. The Pomona serovar is frequently associated to leptospirosis in swine all over the world (13,36). Previous serological surveys carried out in Brazil also identified Pomona as the most prevalent serovar in swine. Giorgi et al. (18) and Santa Rosa et al. (50) reported serology against Pomona in São Paulo, Oliveira (41) in Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul, Ramos et al. (45), in Rio de Janeiro, Fávero (14) in Rio Grande do Sul, Rio de Janeiro and Pernambuco.
Table 3

Resume of Serology, PCR and histopathology results of animals that had positive culture for Leptospira spp.

Pig (Gilts)Culture positive for LeptospiraSerology (MAT) / SerovarPositive PCR for LeptospiraHistopathology - HE
05Gkidney*6400 PomonakidneyInterstitial nephritis
06Gkidney*3200 PomonakidneyNephrosisInterstitial nephritisHemorrhagic focusLesion glomerulousCongestion liver
09Kkidney*1600 PomonanoneSevere interstitial nephritisCongestion liver
10KLiver3200 PomonanoneNephrosisInterstitial nephritisHemorrhagic focus Glomerular lesionsCongestion liverInflammatory cells (genital tract)
genital tractnome
11Kkidney*negativenonenone

Warthin-Starry staining positive; HE: Hematoxilin-Eosin.

Resume of Serology, PCR and histopathology results of animals that had positive culture for Leptospira spp. Warthin-Starry staining positive; HE: Hematoxilin-Eosin. Microscopic lesions in kidneys, evidenced by the hematoxilin-eosin, were found in higher frequency in animals positive for leptospires (culture and/or PCR) than in animals without evidence of leptospires. The lesions were classified from moderate (05/G and 09/K) to severe with hemorrhagic focuses (11/K) and glomerulonephritis. The presence of the spirochetes in the kidneys of animals with positive cultures for leptospires (05G, 06G, 09K and 11K) was confirmed by Warthin-Starry staining. The animal with leptospires isolated from the liver (10K) had also structural lesions of hepatic congestion. Similar findings were reported by Freitas et al. (15). The animal 10K presented congestion of uterine horns and focuses of mononuclear cells in its genital tract, as described by Delbem et al. (5) and Schönberg et al. (55). Titers ≥ 100 in the cross agglutination between antisera and antigens are shown in Table 4. The cross agglutination between the isolates and reference polyclonal antibodies (bgvv) resulted in titers of 6400 with Pomona. Cross agglutination of rabbit antisera resulted titers ≥ 100 with 11 out of 24 live antigens. The titers with Pomona antigen (POM) were: 3200 (KR11), 6400 (GR5, KR9, KF10) and 12800 (GR6).
Table 4

Titers ≥ 100 in the cross agglutination test between antisera and antigens.

Titers ≥ 100
AntiseraAntigens
BRAAUTBUTWHICYNGRICOPPANPOMPYRSHEGR5GR6KR9KF10KR11
GR510064006400
GR6400800100128006400
KR94001600200800400100640010040025600
KF101001600200200640025600
KR11100800100100100100320010020025600
Pomona (bgvv)1280064006400640064006400
Titers ≥ 100 in the cross agglutination test between antisera and antigens. The results of the molecular typing by the VNTR technique of the five isolates (GR5, GR6, KR9, KF10, KR11), as well as three reference strains (L. interrogans serovars Djasiman, Pomona and Kennewicki) are shown in Fig. 1 and Table 5. Interestingly, a single genotype, different from the reference strains tested, was obtained with the isolates. The three reference strains were chosen because they share the same banding size obtained with the isolates for some of the VNTRs analyzed. This direct comparison was necessary to ascertain that the difference was not a miscalculation of the size of the band, what would have lead to an erroneous result. In addition, serovar Pomona and serovar Kennewicki belong to Pomona serogroup, therefore either of them would be compatible with the serological characterization.
Figure 1

Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR amplified fragments from the six VNTR loci used to characterize the L. interrogans isolates. Lane 1, serovar Djasiman stain Djasiman (reference); lane 2, serovar Pomona, strain Pomona (reference); lane 3, serovar Kennewicki strain LT 1026 (reference); lane 4, one of the five isolates obtained from swine. Note distinct profile obtained with the isolates. Analysis of the VNTR 11 was also carried out, but it was not included in this gel.

Table 5

VNTR analysis of five L. interrogans isolates and three reference strains. Copy number of VNTR locus.

IsolatesVNTR 4VNTR 7VNTR 9VNTR 10VNTR 11VNTR 19VNTR 23
GR541610282
GR641610282
KR941610282
KF1041610282
KR1141610282
Pomona*20614281
Kennewicki**50610283
Djasiman***51113382

L. interrogans Pomona serovar Pomona strain Pomona (reference)

L. interrogans Pomona serovar Kennewicki strain LT1026 (reference)

L. interrogans Djasiman serovar Djasiman strain Djasiman (reference)

Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR amplified fragments from the six VNTR loci used to characterize the L. interrogans isolates. Lane 1, serovar Djasiman stain Djasiman (reference); lane 2, serovar Pomona, strain Pomona (reference); lane 3, serovar Kennewicki strain LT 1026 (reference); lane 4, one of the five isolates obtained from swine. Note distinct profile obtained with the isolates. Analysis of the VNTR 11 was also carried out, but it was not included in this gel. VNTR analysis of five L. interrogans isolates and three reference strains. Copy number of VNTR locus. L. interrogans Pomona serovar Pomona strain Pomona (reference) L. interrogans Pomona serovar Kennewicki strain LT1026 (reference) L. interrogans Djasiman serovar Djasiman strain Djasiman (reference) The genotype presented by the isolates was recently described by Pavan et al. (43) in L. interrogans serovar Pomona isolated in Argentina, and named Genotype A. Interestingly, this genotype differs from the serovar Pomona type strain in four VNTR loci. Pavan et al. (43) characterized 16 L. interrogans serovar Pomona strains isolated from animals and humans in Argentina, and identified four distinct genotypes. Genotype A, comprising 12 strains, is identical to the genotype identified for the isolates characterized in this study. The other 3 genotypes have a distinct number of tandem repeats in VNTR4, but share the same number in the other VNTRs. Apparently, L. interrogans serovar Pomona from Brazil and Argentina have a similar genetic profile, distinct from the reference strain. A larger number of serovar Pomona strains have to be typed to confirm if this profile is specific for this region, or if it is also found in other parts of the world. Another important observation was that serovar Kennewicki strain LT1026 has three tandem repeats in VNTR 23, and not two as originally reported by Majed et al. (33). It is conceivable that this difference is due to polymorphism that this strain has undergone upon successive passages in semi-solid medium. However, there are evidences that these VNTR loci are relatively stable over time. Similarly, in serovar Djasiman strain Djasiman, VNTR9 showed only 1 repeat and not 7 as previously reported (33). It remains to be elucidated if this difference is due to a misinterpretation of the result, or if it represents a polymorphism that occurred over time in these strains. The results presented here show that L. interrogans serovar Pomona is prevalent in apparently healthy swine. The implication of this observation in productive parameters remains to be determined, however, as it is a zoonosis, the presence of animals shedding leptospires constitute a potential risk of infection to humans and other domestic animals. The isolates obtained showed a distinct genetic profile, similar to Pomona strains isolated in Argentina.

RESUMO

Isolamento e caracterização de de suínos abatidos no Estado de São Paulo, Brasil

Amostras de soro sanguíneo, rim, fígado e trato genital de 137 fêmeas suínas (40 matrizes e 97 marrãs) e de urina de 22 matrizes foram colhidas em abatedouro no Estado de São Paulo, no período de abril de 2003 a agosto de 2004 tendo como objetivo o isolamento de Leptospira spp. Quatro estirpes foram isoladas de animais que apresentaram títulos, no teste de soroaglutinação microscópica (SAM) ≥ 100, para o sorovar Pomona e de um animal, não reagente na SAM, em que houve isolamento de leptospiras do fígado e aparelho reprodutor. A presença do DNA de leptospira foi investigada pela técnica da PCR e foram observados resultados positivos nos rins de 11 fêmeas, no fígado de duas, no aparelho reprodutor de duas e na urina de uma delas. Nefrose, nefrite intersticial multifocal variando de moderada a severa, cilindros hialinos e focos hemorrágicos, congestão hepática e de cornos uterinos foram lesões histológicas evidenciadas com freqüência mais alta em animais positivos para leptospira. A impregnação argêntica (Warthin Starry) confirmou a presença de espiroquetas nos túbulos renais das quatro fêmeas onde houve cultura positiva para leptospiras dos rins. O sorogrupo dos cinco isolados foi identificado como Pomona pela técnica de aglutinação cruzada com anticorpos policlonais de referência. A caracterização molecular dos isolados foi realizada pela análise do número variável de repetições em tandem (VNTR). Os mesmos revelaram um padrão distinto da estirpe padrão de L. interrogans sorovar Pomona, porém idêntico a um padrão previamente identificado em estirpes isoladas na Argentina, pertencentes ao sorovar Pomona. Palavras-chave: Pomona. Suínos. VNTR. Isolamento. PCR. Trato Genital.
  31 in total

Review 1.  Leptospirosis.

Authors:  P N Levett
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Detection of leptospires in bovine semen by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  M B Heinemann; J F Garcia; C M Nunes; Z M Morais; F Gregori; A Cortez; S A Vasconcellos; J A Visintin; L J Richtzenhain
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  Leptospirae of serotype lora of the serogroup Australis isolated for the first time from swine in the Netherlands.

Authors:  E G Hartman; B Brummelman; H Dikken
Journal:  Tijdschr Diergeneeskd       Date:  1975-04-15

4.  APPLICATION OF A MICROTECHNIQUE TO THE AGGLUTINATION TEST FOR LEPTOSPIRAL ANTIBODIES.

Authors:  M M GALTON; C R SULZER; C A SANTAROSA; M J FIELDS
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1965-01

Review 5.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Chris C Wright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

6.  A rapid and quantitative method for the detection of Leptospira species in human leptospirosis.

Authors:  Fabrice Merien; Denis Portnoi; Pascale Bourhy; Françoise Charavay; Alain Berlioz-Arthaud; Guy Baranton
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  A multiplex PCR for the detection of Brucella spp. and Leptospira spp. DNA from aborted bovine fetuses.

Authors:  Leonardo José Richtzenhain; Adriana Cortez; Marcos Bryan Heinemann; Rodrigo Martins Soares; Sidnei Miyoshi Sakamoto; Silvio Arruda Vasconcellos; Zenaide Maria Morais Higa; Eliana Scarcelli; Margareth Elide Genovez
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Identification of variable-number tandem-repeat loci in Leptospira interrogans sensu stricto.

Authors:  Z Majed; E Bellenger; D Postic; C Pourcel; G Baranton; M Picardeau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Leptospira spp. in clinical samples.

Authors:  F Mérien; P Amouriaux; P Perolat; G Baranton; I Saint Girons
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Recommendations for the detection of Leptospira in urine by PCR.

Authors:  Paula M A Lucchesi; Guillermo H Arroyo; Analía I Etcheverría; Alberto E Parma; Alfredo C Seijo
Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop       Date:  2004-04-13       Impact factor: 1.581

View more
  11 in total

1.  Molecular Epidemiology of Leptospira Serogroup Pomona Infections Among Wild and Domestic Animals in Spain.

Authors:  Z J Arent; C Gilmore; J M San-Miguel Ayanz; L Quevedo Neyra; F J García-Peña
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  Molecular and serological characterization of Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola isolated from dogs, swine, and bovine in Brazil.

Authors:  Fabiana Miraglia; Zenaide M de Morais; Odir A Dellagostin; Fabiana K Seixas; Julio C Freitas; Francielle G S Zacarias; Adina C Delbem; Thaís S P Ferreira; Gisele O Souza; Rudy A Hartskeerl; Silvio A Vasconcellos; Andrea M Moreno
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Identification of Leptospira spp. in the animal-environment interface (swine-water) in pig production cycle.

Authors:  Maria Catalina Ospina-Pinto; Patricia Hernández-Rodríguez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Serological survey on Leptospira infection in slaughtered swine in North-Central Italy.

Authors:  F Bertelloni; B Turchi; E Vattiata; P Viola; S Pardini; D Cerri; F Fratini
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Cross-protection between experimental anti-leptospirosis bacterins.

Authors:  Cristina Corsi Dib; Amane Paldês Gonçales; Zenaide Maria de Morais; Gisele Oliveira de Souza; Fabiana Miraglia; Patricia Antonia Estima Abreu; Silvio Arruda Vasconcellos
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 2.476

6.  Draft Genome Sequence of Brazilian Leptospira interrogans Serovar Pomona Strain GR5, Isolated from Apparently Healthy Gilt.

Authors:  Luisa Zanolli Moreno; Fabiana Miraglia; Carolina Helena de Oliveira; Silvio Arruda Vasconcellos; Marcos Bryan Heinemann; Andrea Micke Moreno
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2018-06-07

7.  Prevalence of Leptospira serogroups in buffaloes from the Brazilian Amazon.

Authors:  Israel B Guedes; Gisele O de Souza; Lilian A R de Oliveira; Juliana F de P Castro; Antônio F de Souza Filho; Anderson L P Maia; Marcos B Heinemann
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-21

8.  Serological Survey and Molecular Typing Reveal New Leptospira Serogroup Pomona Strains among Pigs of Northern Italy.

Authors:  Cristina Bertasio; Alice Papetti; Erika Scaltriti; Silvia Tagliabue; Mario D'Incau; Maria Beatrice Boniotti
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-04-29

9.  Leptospira interrogans serogroup Pomona strains isolated from river buffaloes.

Authors:  Israel Barbosa Guedes; Gisele Oliveira de Souza; Juliana Fernandes de Paula Castro; Matheus Burilli Cavalini; Antônio Francisco de Souza Filho; Anderson Luiz Pinheiro Maia; Eduardo Alberto Dos Reis; Adriana Cortez; Marcos Bryan Heinemann
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.559

10.  Influence of Selective Agents (EMJH-STAFF), Sample Filtration and pH on Leptospira interrogans Serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae Cultivation and Isolation from Swine Urine.

Authors:  Romana Steinparzer; Tamara Mair; Christine Unterweger; Adi Steinrigl; Friedrich Schmoll
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.