| Literature DB >> 32319231 |
Israel B Guedes1, Gisele O de Souza1, Lilian A R de Oliveira1, Juliana F de P Castro1, Antônio F de Souza Filho1, Anderson L P Maia2, Marcos B Heinemann1.
Abstract
Although Brazil has one of the largest buffalo populations in the Americas, buffalo leptospirosis is still poorly explored when compared to that in bovines; thus, the aim of this research was to carry out a large serological study for leptospirosis in this species in the Brazilian Amazon. For this, we collected 1,405 serum samples from buffaloes raised in the Amazon delta region, which is considered a major area of buffalo production in Brazil. The test used was a microscopic agglutination test (MAT) adopting 34 Leptospira antigens, some of which have never been tested for buffaloes in Brazil, including autochthonous strains; in total, 20 serogroups were evaluated. From the total of 1,405 serum samples, 894 (63.6%) reacted in the MAT to at least one of the 20 serogroups, and 511 (36.4%) did not react. The serogroups Sejroe, Autumnalis and Pomona were the most prevalent, with titres ranging from 100 to 12,800, and the autochthonous strains used were not significant in relation to the reference serovars. Leptospirosis in buffaloes seems to have a serological profile similar to leptospirosis in cattle, mainly due to the prevalence of the Sejroe serogroup; however, the results of this study suggested that in the Brazilian Amazon, Leptospira strains that are serologically distinct from the autochthonous strains isolated in the southeastern region of Brazil may be circulating in these animals. Other serovars could also be inserted into the panel of antigens used in MAT for serological studies on buffaloes.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Leptospirazzm321990; Amazonia; Brazil; Buffalo; MAT
Year: 2020 PMID: 32319231 PMCID: PMC7397922 DOI: 10.1002/vms3.271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Sci ISSN: 2053-1095
Figure 1Geographical location of the Amazon delta in Brazil
Serovars of Leptospira spp. used as antigens in the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) listed by serogroups
| Serogroup | Serovar |
|---|---|
| Australis | Australis |
| Bratislava | |
| Autumnalis | Autumnalis |
| Butembo | |
| Ballum | Castellonis |
| Bataviae | Brasiliensis |
| Canicola | Canicola |
| Celledoni | Whitcombi |
| Cynopteri | Cynopteri |
| Djasiman | Sentot |
| Grippotyphosa | Grippotyphosa |
| Bananal | |
| Hebdomadis | Hebdomadis |
| Icterohaemorrhagiae | Copenhageni |
| Icterohaemorrhagiae | |
| Javanica | Javanica |
| Mini | Mini |
| Panama | Panama |
| Pomona | Pomona |
| Pomona (GR6) | |
| Pyrogenes | Pyrogenes |
| Ranarum | Ranarum |
| Sejroe | Gorgas |
| Guaricura | |
| Hardjo‐prajitno | |
| Hardjo‐bovis | |
| Medanensis | |
| Polonica | |
| Recreo | |
| Ricardi | |
| Sejroe | |
| Wolffi | |
| Shermani | Shermani |
| Tarassovi | Tarassovi |
Autochthonous strains isolated in Brazil.
Santa Rosa, Sulzer, and Pestana de Castro (1972).
Marvulo et al. (2002).
Miraglia et al. (2008).
Yasuda et al. (1986).
Vasconcellos et al. (2001).
Frequency of antibody titres found for 13 serogroups of Leptospira spp. in relation to the number of reactive samples by the ranking technique
|
Serogroups | Titres | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 200 | 400 | 800 | 1,600 | 3,200 | 6,400 | 12,800 | Total | Total (%) | |
| Sejroe | 49 | 99 | 96 | 26 | 4 | — | — | — | 274 | 41.2 |
| Autumnalis | 43 | 71 | 36 | 3 | — | — | — | — | 153 | 23.0 |
| Pomona | 15 | 40 | 25 | 20 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 109 | 16.3 |
| Grippotyphosa | 7 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 3 | — | — | — | 40 | 6.0 |
| Tarassovi | 6 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | — | 28 | 4.2 |
| Ranarum | 10 | 14 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | 27 | 4.1 |
| Sentot | 11 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 1.8 |
| Hebdomadis | 5 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 1.2 |
| Panama | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 0.6 |
| Ballum | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 0.5 |
| Icterohaemorrhagiae | — | 2 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 0.5 |
| Cynopteri | 2 | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 0.5 |
| Australis | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 0.1 |
Figure 2Percentage of reactive samples for each serovar representative of the Sejroe serogroup used in relation to number of reactive for this serogroup
Figure 3Percentage of reactive samples for each autochthonous strain used in relation to total number of reactive samples by the ranking technique