Literature DB >> 25477946

Cross-protection between experimental anti-leptospirosis bacterins.

Cristina Corsi Dib1, Amane Paldês Gonçales2, Zenaide Maria de Morais2, Gisele Oliveira de Souza2, Fabiana Miraglia2, Patricia Antonia Estima Abreu3, Silvio Arruda Vasconcellos2.   

Abstract

We investigated the existence of cross-protection between two anti-leptospirosis monovalent experimental bacterins produced with two strains of Leptospira serogroup Pomona: Fromm strain of serovar Kennewicky, isolated from pigs in the United States, and strain GR6 of serovar Pomona isolated from pigs in Brazil. Both were added of aluminum hydroxide as an adjuvant. Experimental bacterins were tested with the hamster potency test in order to assess protection provided against the disease and against the establishment of kidney infection. Controls were polyvalent commercial vaccine produced with Leptospira strains isolated outside Brazil, which included a representative of Pomona serovar, or Sorensen solution added of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. The challenge was performed with cross-strains of serogroup Pomona tested in accordance with international standards established for the potency test. After 21 days of the challenge, survivors were killed to evaluate the condition of Leptospira renal carrier. Experimental bacterins protected hamsters against homologous and heterologous strains, demonstrating the existence of cross-protection. The commercial vaccine protected the hamsters challenged with both strains, but there was a high proportion of animals diagnosed as renal carriers when the challenge was performed with strain GR6, isolated from pigs in Brazil.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pomona; bacterin; cross-protection; hamsters

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25477946      PMCID: PMC4204950          DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000300042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Microbiol        ISSN: 1517-8382            Impact factor:   2.476


Introduction

Leptospirosis is a zoonosis caused by pathogenic bacteria in the genus Leptospira, transmitted directly or indirectly to men (Ahmed ). It is considered today an emerging infectious disease, and it is of worldwide importance (Ko ), although it occurs more frequently in tropical and subtropical areas (Ahmed ). Pigs are important sources of Leptospira infection to men and other species of domestic animals (Vijayachari ). In general, infected pigs may shed a large number of Leptospira in the urine for long periods of time (Miraglia ). Clinical signs observed in pig herds infected by Leptospira mainly involve the reproductive system, such as miscarriage, neonatal mortality, premature birth, and stillbirths. Increase in birth interval and reduction in litter size are also important, as well as temporary infertility and permanent sterility in sows (Ramos ). Pigs are considered a maintenance host of serovar Pomona, with prolonged and abundant shedding in urine. In its clinical form, infection varies in different herds (Soto, 2007; Suepaul ). Serological studies conducted in Brazil have identified the predominance of reactions to serovar Pomona in pig herds of several Brazilian states (Favero ; Gonçalves ; Miraglia ). The best preventive measure against swine leptospirosis is vaccination with bacterins, which are suspensions of polyvalent whole, inactivated bacterial cells, produced with the most common serovars found in a region or country (Gonçales, 2007). However, these bacterins have to be formulated with the lesser number of serovars possible, with special emphasis in the most common ones found in a given region or country (Tabata ). Anti-leptospirosis bacterins produced with whole cells have been, in general, very efficient in the protection against lethal infection in immunized animals, although protection is limited in duration, and restricted to the serovar components and those that are antigenically related to them (Suepaul ). However, when efficacy of a vaccine against leptospirosis is analyzed, protection against lethal infection (death) should be differentiated from protection against the carrier state (organ infection and urinary shedding), mainly in pigs, animals in which the state of asymptomatic carrier may persist for years, making them important sources of infection for other animals and men (Naranjo ). Nowadays, few studies have been carried out to demonstrate the existence of cross-protection between Leptospira serogroups. Naranjo demonstrated, using the potency test, cross-protection between a trivalent vaccine with serovars Canicola, Icterohaemorrhagiae, and Pomona, and homologous strains and two heterologous strains belonging to serovar Ballum. Sonrier analyzed protection conferred to gerbils immunized with the aqueous phase (containing LPS) and the extract of antigenic purified protein, and demonstrated that LPS was only able to protect the animals against the homologous challenge with strains Icterohaemorrhagiae 193 and Canicola (can V). On the other hand, antigenic proteins extracted from virulent Canicola protected immunized animals from the challenge with heterologous strains, showing that the three serogroups (Autumnalis, Icterohaemorrhagiae, and Canicola) of Leptospira interrogans have common antigens responsible for cross-protection and found in virulent and avirulent strains in amounts dependent on the virulence of the strain. Tabata verified the existence of cross-protection using neutralizing antibodies of serovars Hardjo and Guaricura against serovars Hardjo, Wolffi and Guaricura. In this case, the growth inhibition test was employed in the evaluation of anti-leptospirosis bacterins produced with different serovars of Sejroe group. There is a consensus on the fact that protection conferred by anti-leptospirosis bacterins is serovar-specific, limiting their efficiency. However, it is likely that there are differences in immunogenic power of different strains of a same serogroup or serovar, not only in relation to protection against the disease, but also in relation to the protection against the renal carrier status (Bey and Johnson, 1982). This aspect has great epidemiological importance due to the persistence and dissemination of the infection in herds (Faine, 1999). The present study was designed to investigate the existence of cross-protection between two strains of Leptospira interrogans that are pathogenic to hamsters, both belonging to serogroup Pomona.

Materials and Methods

Two experimental monovalent bacterins were produced: Strain GR6 of Leptospira serovar Pomona isolated from sows in a slaughterhouse in the state of São Paulo (Miraglia ), and Fromm strain of serovar Kennewicki, isolated from pigs in the USA, supplied by Salsbury Laboratories. Bacterins were used in a potency test to assess cross-protection according to the CFR 113.101 (United States of America, 2006). A commercial polyvalent bacterin was also used in the comparison of the results. Experimental bacterins were produced by means of the culture of samples obtained directly from a macerate of liver of hamsters that were experimentally infected and killed in the agonic phase of the infection. Culture medium used was modified liquid EMJH (Ellinghausen-McCullough-Johnson-Harris, base DIFCO-Detroit, USA), enriched with 15% of rabbit serum, 1% calcium chloride and magnesium chloride, 3% L-asparagine, 1% sodium pyruvate, peptone, and meat extract (Alves ). Bacterial cells were counted in a Petroff Hausser chamber in dark field microscopy. Vaccine dose was adjusted to 107 cells in 180 μL, in which 20 μL (10% of the total volume of the dose) of the adjuvant aluminum hydroxide were added at the moment of bacterin administration. After the number of cells was determined, cultures were centrifuged three times at 12,800 g for 30 min at 4 °C, and washed with Sorensen buffer solution. The final pellet was resuspended in the total volume calculated as a function of the number of doses and total number of cells in culture. The final product was inactivated in a water bath at 56 °C for 20 min. After that, the bacterin was divided into smaller aliquots according to the need, and frozen at −20 °C. Young male hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) weighting 60 to 100 g were used. They were divided in lots of ten animals each, kept in polypropylene boxes with bedding of wood shavings. Animals had free access to treated water from the public water system and commercial pelleted feed. The boxes with the animals were kept in the infection facility of the Departamento de Medicina Veterinária e Saúde Animal at Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia of Universidade de São Paulo. Animals vaccinated were divided in groups of ten, as follows: twenty animals vaccinated with bacterin GR6; twenty animals vaccinated with bacterin Fromm; twenty animals vaccinated with commercial bacterin; and twenty animals treated with sterile saline solution 0.85% added of the aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. All the groups were challenged with strain GR6 or Fromm (Table 1).
Table 1

Hamsters submitted to the potency test of anti-leptospirosis bacterin according to the type of immunogen, the Leptospira strain used in the challenge and the identification number of the experimental group.

GroupType of immunogenChallenge strain
1Sterile saline solution 0.85% and aluminum hydroxide 10%GR6
2Sterile saline solution 0.85% and aluminum hydroxide 10%Fromm
3Bacterin GR6GR6
4Bacterin GR6Fromm
5Bacterin FrommGR6
6Bacterin FrommFromm
7Commercial bacterinGR6
8Commercial bacterinFromm
Hamsters submitted to the potency test of anti-leptospirosis bacterin according to the type of immunogen, the Leptospira strain used in the challenge and the identification number of the experimental group. All animals vaccinated with GR6, Fromm, and commercial bacterins, and the negative control group received two doses of 0.20 mL of bacterin or sterile saline solution 0.85% added of aluminum hydroxide 10%, according to the case, by subcutaneous route with a 15-day interval between the two doses. After 15 days of the second dose of the vaccine, all animals were challenged with 0.2 mL of live culture of strains GR6 or Pomona Fromm by intraperitoneal route. After the challenge, animals were observed for 21 consecutive days, and those that died of leptospirosis were counted. At the end of this period, animals that survived the challenge were killed in a CO2 chamber and necropsied to collect their kidneys for culture in Fletcher medium to assess control of Leptospira renal infection. Titration of the challenging inoculums with the two strains of the Pomona serogroup was carried out using hamsters divided into groups of five animals per strain, and ten animals in the dilutions of strains Fromm and GR6 chosen for the challenge, respectively, 10−6 and 10−2. Animals inoculated with strain GR6 were divided in seven groups according to the challenge dilution used, which ranged from 10−1 to 10−7, in a geometric scale with ratio 10. Animals inoculated with Fromm strain received one dose between dilutions 10−5 and 10−10. Challenge doses were 0.2 mL/hamster, by intraperitoneal route. Animals were observed every day for 21 days, and Reed and Muench (1938) method was used to calculate the lethal dose (LD50). Twenty one days post-infection (d.p.i) by Leptospira, surviving hamsters were killed in a CO2 chamber. Animals were necropsied and their kidneys were aseptically collected and ground, and then diluted in Sorensen buffer solution in tenfold serial dilutions (10−1 to 10−3). For each dilution, 100 μL were cultured in two tubes containing semi-solid Fletcher medium, and incubated at 28–30 °C for six weeks. Cultures were observed weekly to assess Leptospira ring of growth in the medium, confirmed by the presence of Leptospira in dark field microscopy. The study was analyzed and approved by the Bioethics Committee at Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia of Universidade de São Paulo, protocol number 1430/2008.

Results

Results presented in Tables 2 and 3 enabled the calculation of LD50 by the Leptospira strain used in the challenge, respectively 10−5.3033 for strain GR6, and 10−7.6896 for Fromm strain, as well as the LD50 effectively used, respectively, 2010 for strain GR6 and 48.9 for Fromm strain. As the CFR 113.101 (United States of America, 2006) determines that LD50 should be between 10 and 10,000, it may be considered that for the two strains used, LD50 effectively used were inside the accepted range.
Table 2

Number of hamsters challenged with strain GR6 of Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona at the end of the 21-day observation period according to the dilution of the infective inoculum, the condition of the animals and the parameters necessary to calculate LD50 according to the Reed and Muench method (12).

DSMAccumulated frequencyS (b)c/(b+c) (Cumulative % of deaths)M(c)Total (b+c)
10−11412829
10−23742428
10−31451722
10−42371320
10−52391019
10−6059716
10−73212214

D: Dilution of the infective challenge inoculum with strain GR6 of serovar Pomona.

S: Number of animals that survived the Leptospira infection.

M: Number of deaths caused by leptospirosis.

LD 50 = 10−5.3033.

Table 3

Number of hamsters challenged with strain Fromm of Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona at the end of the 21-day observation period according to the dilution of the infective inoculum, the condition of the animals, and the parameters necessary to calculate LD50 according to the Reed and Muench method (12).

DSMAccumulated frequencyS (b)c/(b+c) (cummulative % of deaths)M(c)Total (b+c)
10−52321921
10−63751621
10−7146915
10−8006511
10−95511011

D: Dilution of the infective challenge inoculum with strain Fromm of serovar Pomona.

S: Number of animals that survived the Leptospira infection.

M: Number of deaths caused by leptospirosis.

LD50 = 10−7.6896.

Number of hamsters challenged with strain GR6 of Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona at the end of the 21-day observation period according to the dilution of the infective inoculum, the condition of the animals and the parameters necessary to calculate LD50 according to the Reed and Muench method (12). D: Dilution of the infective challenge inoculum with strain GR6 of serovar Pomona. S: Number of animals that survived the Leptospira infection. M: Number of deaths caused by leptospirosis. LD 50 = 10−5.3033. Number of hamsters challenged with strain Fromm of Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona at the end of the 21-day observation period according to the dilution of the infective inoculum, the condition of the animals, and the parameters necessary to calculate LD50 according to the Reed and Muench method (12). D: Dilution of the infective challenge inoculum with strain Fromm of serovar Pomona. S: Number of animals that survived the Leptospira infection. M: Number of deaths caused by leptospirosis. LD50 = 10−7.6896. Control animals vaccinated with sterile saline solution 0.85% added of aluminum hydroxide as the adjuvant and challenged with strain GR6 showed a rate of survival of five animals from the ten challenged. This result is greater than the maximum established in the CFR 113.101 (United States of America, 2006) (2/10). However, the five survivors showed kidney cultures positive for Leptospira. In the control group, animals challenged with Fromm strain showed only one survivor in ten animals, a result that is in agreement with the CFR 113.101 guidelines (United States of America, 2006) (Table 4).
Table 4

Proportion of hamsters that survived the challenge according to the type of immunogen used and the strain of the Pomona serogroup used. São Paulo, 2012.

Type of immunogenChallenge strain of serovar PomonaGR6
Sterile saline solution 0.85% and aluminum hydroxide5/10
Bacterin GR610/10
Bacterin Fromm10/10
Commercial bacterin8/10

Number of survivors/number of challenged animals.

Proportion of hamsters that survived the challenge according to the type of immunogen used and the strain of the Pomona serogroup used. São Paulo, 2012. Number of survivors/number of challenged animals. Animals immunized with the experimental polyvalent bacterin were protected against the two strains of Leptospira used in the challenge, with the number of survivors inside the range determined by the CFR 113.101 (United States of America, 2006) for the vaccine to be approved (8/10). Table 5 presents the results of the cultures in Fletcher medium used to assess the presence of Leptospira in the kidneys of hamsters vaccinated and surviving the challenge with GR6 and Fromm strains. From ten animals vaccinated with bacterin GR6 that survived the challenge, only one was confirmed as a renal carrier of Leptospira. All animals vaccinated with bacterin Fromm presented kidney culture for negative for Leptospira. On the other hand, the polyvalent commercial bacterin protected against renal colonization only in the group of animals challenged with Fromm strain. In the group of animals challenged with strain GR6, seven of eight survivors showed kidney culture positive for Leptospira.
Table 5

Proportion of hamsters vaccinated and that survived the challenge with strains GR6 e Fromm of Leptospira interrogans serogroup Pomona characterized as renal carriers of Leptospira 21 post-infection, according to the type of treatment used.

Type of treatmentGR6Fromm
Sterile saline solution 0.85% and aluminum hydroxide5/50/1
Bacterin GR61/100/10
Bacterin Fromm0/100/10
Commercial bacterin7/80/9
Proportion of hamsters vaccinated and that survived the challenge with strains GR6 e Fromm of Leptospira interrogans serogroup Pomona characterized as renal carriers of Leptospira 21 post-infection, according to the type of treatment used.

Discussion

All animals immunized with the experimental monovalent bacterins produced with Fromm and GR6 strains survived the challenge with the two homologous or heterologous strains, confirming the occurrence of cross-protection between these two members of the Pomona serogroup. Studies involving the evaluation of anti-leptospirosis bacterin recommend Leptospira counts between 106 (Zeigler ) and 109 cells per mL of medium (Zeigler ; González ). Due to these previous studies with experimental bacterins, it was decided on a concentration of 107 cells per dose of 200 μL of bacterin, with 180 μL of bacterin and 20μL of aluminum hydroxide as the adjuvant. Results presented in Table 3 comply with the protocol determined by the CFR 113.101 (United States of America, 2006), which considers the vaccine approved when the rate of deaths by leptospirosis with the challenge inoculum containing between 10 and 10,000 LD50 is equal or greater than 8/10 in the non-vaccinated control group, and not greater than 2/10 or 5/20 in the vaccinated group. It is possible to observe that, although the group of vaccinated animals presented a result that is considered satisfactory by these international guidelines, in the animals vaccinated with both experimental vaccines, and in control animals vaccinated with sterile saline solution and aluminum hydroxide that were challenged with strain Pomona GR6, mortality was only five animals in ten inoculated, a result that is not in compliance with the criteria determined by the potency test protocol. In this protocol, mortality of the control animals should be less than eight in ten animals. However, all five survivors showed kidney cultures positive for Leptospira, confirming the exposure to the agent and showing that, in this case, strain GR6 was less pathogenic to hamsters than Fromm strain. In fact, virulence of Fromm strain has been kept by successive passages in hamsters, preserving its pathogenicity for these animals (Tabata ). Strain GR6 was isolated by Miraglia et al. (2008) and was kept in semi-solid Fletcher medium with six-month replications. When this study was carried out, strain GR6 was submitted to successive “blind” passages in hamsters in order to recover its virulence and pathogenicity, which could have been attenuated in the synthetic media (Reed ). In animals vaccinated and challenged with Fromm strain, no animal was characterized as a renal carrier. On the contrary, animals challenged with strain GR6 showed a large proportion of renal carriers among animals vaccinated with the polyvalent commercial bacterin (7/8). This assessment indicates that although the two strains that were used belong to the same serogroup, protection conferred by the commercial bacterin produced with Leptospira strains isolated outside of Brazil was not enough to protect against infection and colonization of the kidneys in animals challenged with a strain of Leptospira of the same serogroup that occur in pig herds in Brazil. Although PCR is considered more sensitive, culture of Leptospira is often used for evaluation of carrier status in hamsters kidney in potency tests of bacterins. The results of the isolation of Leptospira in the kidneys of hamsters challenged with strain GR6 were satisfactory and consistent with the virulence characteristics and maintenance of the two strains in the laboratory. In the present study, although the group of non-vaccinated control animals challenged with strain GR6, the minimum proportion of animals killed by leptospirosis (5/10) was lower than that required by the CFR 113.101 (United States of America, 2006) (8/10), the LD50 effectively employed (2010) was inside the accepted range (10 to 10000), and all survivors to the challenge presented renal cultures positive for Leptospira. Therefore, the occurrence of cross-protection between the two strains may be considered, mainly in animals immunized with monovalent experimental bacterins. It was also demonstrated that experimental bacterins presented results proportionally greater when challenged with homologous and heterologous strains when compared with the commercial polyvalent vaccine, preventing the colonization of the kidneys by Leptospira in almost all vaccinated hamsters, compared with the high proportion of Leptospira isolation in the kidneys when the commercial bacterin was used.

Conclusions

Experimental bacterins produced with Fromm strain of serovar Kennewicki and Pomona GR6, both belonging to the Pomona serogroup of L. interrogans protected the hamsters against the homologous and heterologous challenge, demonstrating cross-protection. The high proportion of hamsters vaccinated with the commercial bacterin and characterized as renal carriers of strain GR6 confirms the need to develop commercial bacterins with Leptospira isolates that occur in Brazil.
  12 in total

1.  The maintenance of challenge strains used in the potency test for canine leptospira vaccines.

Authors:  N E Reed; W C Varney; R D Goddard; P J Wyeth
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.856

2.  Influence of leptospirosis on reproductive performance of sows in Brazil.

Authors:  Antonio C F Ramos; Guilherme N Souza; Walter Lilenbaum
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  Leptospira: the dawn of the molecular genetics era for an emerging zoonotic pathogen.

Authors:  Albert I Ko; Cyrille Goarant; Mathieu Picardeau
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Immunization against leptospirosis: vaccine trials with heat-killed whole cell and outer envelope antigens in hamsters.

Authors:  J A Zeigler; R H Jones; K Kubica
Journal:  Bull Pan Am Health Organ       Date:  1976

5.  Study on the efficacy of Leptospira vaccines developed from serovars isolated from Trinidad and comparison with commercial vaccines using a hamster model.

Authors:  S M Suepaul; C V Carrington; M Campbell; G Borde; A A Adesiyun
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  [Immunogenicity and protective capacity of leptospiral whole-cell monovalent serogroup Ballum vaccines in hamsters].

Authors:  A González; Y Rodríguez; N Batista; Y Valdés; J F Núñez; M Mirabal; M González
Journal:  Rev Argent Microbiol       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Evidence of cross-protection within Leptospira interrogans in an experimental model.

Authors:  C Sonrier; C Branger; V Michel; N Ruvoën-Clouet; J P Ganière; G André-Fontaine
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Leptospirosis: an emerging global public health problem.

Authors:  P Vijayachari; A P Sugunan; A N Shriram
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Development and validation of a real-time PCR for detection of pathogenic leptospira species in clinical materials.

Authors:  Ahmed Ahmed; Mirjam F M Engelberts; Kimberly R Boer; Niyaz Ahmed; Rudy A Hartskeerl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Isolation and characterization of Leptospira interrogans from pigs slaughtered in São Paulo State, Brazil.

Authors:  Fabiana Miraglia; Andréa Mike Moreno; Cleise Ribeiro Gomes; Renata Paixão; Esequiel Liuson; Zenaide Maria Morais; Paulo Maiorka; Fabiana Kömmling Seixas; Odir Antonio Dellagostin; Silvio Arruda Vasconcellos
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.476

View more
  8 in total

1.  Homologous microscopic agglutinating antibodies after natural infection with leptospires - results from a long term follow up of a cohort living in an endemic area.

Authors:  R Vimal Raj; K Vinod Kumar; A P Sugunan; K Natarajaseenivasan; P Vijayachari
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Efficacy of a New Recrystallized Enrofloxacin Hydrochloride-Dihydrate against Leptospirosis in a Hamster Model.

Authors:  Alma Carrascosa; Lilia Gutierrez; Alejandro De la Peña; Irma E Candanosa; Graciela Tapia; Hector Sumano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Cross-sectional study of Leptospira spp. in commercial pig farms in the state of Goiás, Brazil.

Authors:  Fernando Antônio Moreira Petri; Karina Sonalio; Henrique Meiroz de Souza Almeida; Marina Lopes Mechler-Dreibi; José Vanderlei Burim Galdeano; Luís Antônio Mathias; Luís Guilherme de Oliveira
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  A Universal Vaccine against Leptospirosis: Are We Going in the Right Direction?

Authors:  André Alex Grassmann; Jéssica Dias Souza; Alan John Alexander McBride
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  A novel octavalent combined Erysipelas, Parvo and Leptospira vaccine provides (cross) protection against infection following challenge of pigs with 9 different Leptospira interrogans serovars.

Authors:  A Jacobs; F Harks; M Hoeijmakers; R Segers
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2015-11-17

6.  Efficacy of leptospiral commercial vaccines on the protection against an autochtonous strain recovered in Brazil.

Authors:  Rafael Bazaglia Sonada; Sérgio Santos de Azevedo; Francisco Rafael Martins Soto; Diego Figueiredo da Costa; Zenaide Maria de Morais; Gisele Oliveira de Souza; Amane Paldês Gonçales; Fabiana Miraglia; Sílvio Arruda Vasconcellos
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.476

7.  MAT cross-reactions or vaccine cross-protection: retrospective study of 863 leptospirosis canine cases.

Authors:  Geneviève André-Fontaine; Laetitia Triger
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-11-02

8.  Identification of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Leptospira species of Brazilian isolates by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization and Time Flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Daniel Karcher; Rafaella C Grenfell; Andrea Micke Moreno; Luisa Zanolli Moreno; Silvio Arruda Vasconcellos; Marcos B Heinemann; Joao N de Almeida Junior; Luiz Juliano; Maria A Juliano
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.476

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.