Literature DB >> 24026628

Patient-important activity and participation outcomes in clinical trials involving children with chronic conditions.

Nora Fayed1, Olaf Kraus de Camargo, Inam Elahi, Ankita Dubey, Ricardo M Fernandes, Amy Houtrow, Eyal Cohen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Children with chronic conditions experience medical issues over long-term periods of time which can have lasting emotional and social consequences impacting daily life and functioning. Activities and participation outcomes are needed in order to comprehensively assess child-important health in clinical trials. Our objective was to review the extent to which activity and participation outcomes are included in clinical trials of childhood chronic disease and to determine what trial characteristics are associated with their use.
METHODS: A review of a large clinical trial registration database (clinicaltrials.gov) was conducted over the 2010 calendar year. The measures used to assess primary and secondary endpoints were coded according to the ICF classification system. Trial characteristics that might be associated with activity and participation outcome use such as sponsorship type, intervention type, health condition, whether the trial was focused on pediatric patients, phase of trial and sample size were also extracted and explored with univariable and multivariable regressions.
RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety-nine trials met inclusion criteria, 495 of which had complete information about hypothesized predictors. Only 36 out of 495 trials included an activity and participation outcome as part of the trial evaluation process. Both univariable and multivariable regression models showed that non-drug trials and late phase of trial (phase IV) showed the strongest likelihood with whether a trial would include an activity and participation outcome. DISCUSSION: Most registered clinical trials for children with chronic or ongoing medical conditions do not include a comprehensive approach to health outcomes assessment, especially drug trials and early phase trials. Outcome measures in pediatric clinical trials are lagging relative to World Health Organization standards for comprehensive health evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24026628     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0483-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  17 in total

Review 1.  Do we measure the right end points? A systematic review of primary outcomes in recent neonatal randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  B Zhang; B Schmidt
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 2.  Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  P Jüni; D G Altman; M Egger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-07

3.  The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda.

Authors:  Joe V Selby; Anne C Beal; Lori Frank
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Standard 5: selection, measurement, and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials in children.

Authors:  Ian P Sinha; Douglas G Altman; Michael W Beresford; Maarten Boers; Mike Clarke; Jonathan Craig; Ornella Della Casa Alberighi; Ricardo M Fernandes; Lisa Hartling; Bradley C Johnston; Andrew Lux; Amy Plint; Peter Tugwell; Mark Turner; Johanna H van der Lee; Martin Offringa; Paula R Williamson; Rosalind L Smyth
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials.

Authors:  Nick Partridge; John Scadding
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Nov 27-Dec 3       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Health status and QOL instruments used in childhood cancer research: deciphering conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions.

Authors:  Nora Fayed; Vero Schiariti; Cristina Bostan; Alarcos Cieza; Anne Klassen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: a systematic review of the literature from 2001 to 2008.

Authors:  Nora Fayed; Alarcos Cieza; Jerome Edmond Bickenbach
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.033

8.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  Generic patient-reported outcomes in child health research: a review of conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions.

Authors:  Nora Fayed; Olaf Kraus de Camargo; Elizabeth Kerr; Peter Rosenbaum; Ankita Dubey; Cristina Bostan; Markus Faulhaber; Parminder Raina; Alarcos Cieza
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 10.  The measurement of health-related quality of life (QOL) in paediatric clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sally-Ann Clarke; Christine Eiser
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  8 in total

1.  Partnering with families of children with medical complexity to evaluate interventions.

Authors:  Nora Fayed; Meghan Gardecki; Eyal Cohen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Functional recovery following critical illness in children: the "wee-cover" pilot study.

Authors:  Karen Choong; Samah Al-Harbi; Katie Siu; Katie Wong; Ji Cheng; Burke Baird; David Pogorzelski; Brian Timmons; Jan-Willem Gorter; Lehana Thabane; Mary Khetani
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  Measuring pediatric patient-reported outcomes: good progress but a long way to go.

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Dennis A Revicki; Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Assessing the engagement of children and families in selecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and developing their measures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Malcolm McNeill; Samantha Noyek; Eshetu Engeda; Nora Fayed
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Development of Activity and Participation Norms among General Adult Populations in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chia-Feng Yen; Tzu-Ying Chiu; Tsan-Hon Liou; Wen-Chou Chi; Hua-Fang Liao; Chung-Chao Liang; Reuben Escorpizo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  From the Child's Word to Clinical Intervention: Novel, New, and Innovative Approaches to Symptoms in Pediatric Palliative Care.

Authors:  Katharine E Brock; Joanne Wolfe; Christina Ullrich
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-28

7.  Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity.

Authors:  Christine Kersting; Malte Kneer; Anne Barzel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Patients' perspective on supposedly patient-relevant process and outcome parameters: a cross-sectional survey within the 'PRO patients study'.

Authors:  Christine Kersting; Julia Hülsmann; Klaus Weckbecker; Achim Mortsiefer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.