Karen Choong1, Samah Al-Harbi, Katie Siu, Katie Wong, Ji Cheng, Burke Baird, David Pogorzelski, Brian Timmons, Jan-Willem Gorter, Lehana Thabane, Mary Khetani. 1. 1Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 2Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 3Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 4Department of Pediatrics, and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 5CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 6Department of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of conducting a longitudinal prospective study to evaluate functional recovery and predictors of impaired functional recovery in critically ill children. DESIGN: Prospective pilot study. SETTING: Single-center PICU at McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Canada. PATIENTS: Children aged 12 months to 17 years, with at least one organ dysfunction, limited mobility or bed rest during the first 48 hours of PICU admission, and a minimum 48-hour PICU length of stay, were eligible. Patients transferred from a neonatal ICU prior to ever being discharged home, already mobilizing well or at baseline functional status at time of screening, with an English language barrier, and prior enrollment into this study, were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was feasibility, as defined by the ability to screen, enroll eligible patients, and execute the study procedures and measurements on participants. Secondary outcomes included functional status at baseline, 3 and 6 months, PICU morbidity, and mortality. Functional status was measured using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory and the Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth. Thirty-three patients were enrolled between October 2012 and April 2013. Consent rate was 85%, and follow-up rates were 93% at 3 months and 71% at 6 months. We were able to execute the study procedures and measurements, demonstrating feasibility of conducting a future longitudinal study. Functional status deteriorated following critical illness. Recovery appears to be influenced by baseline health or functional status and severity of illness. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal research is needed to understand how children recover after a critical illness. Our results suggest factors that may influence the recovery trajectory and were used to inform the methodology, outcomes of interest, and appropriate sample size of a larger multicenter study evaluating functional recovery in this population.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of conducting a longitudinal prospective study to evaluate functional recovery and predictors of impaired functional recovery in critically ill children. DESIGN: Prospective pilot study. SETTING: Single-center PICU at McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Canada. PATIENTS: Children aged 12 months to 17 years, with at least one organ dysfunction, limited mobility or bed rest during the first 48 hours of PICU admission, and a minimum 48-hour PICU length of stay, were eligible. Patients transferred from a neonatal ICU prior to ever being discharged home, already mobilizing well or at baseline functional status at time of screening, with an English language barrier, and prior enrollment into this study, were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was feasibility, as defined by the ability to screen, enroll eligible patients, and execute the study procedures and measurements on participants. Secondary outcomes included functional status at baseline, 3 and 6 months, PICU morbidity, and mortality. Functional status was measured using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory and the Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth. Thirty-three patients were enrolled between October 2012 and April 2013. Consent rate was 85%, and follow-up rates were 93% at 3 months and 71% at 6 months. We were able to execute the study procedures and measurements, demonstrating feasibility of conducting a future longitudinal study. Functional status deteriorated following critical illness. Recovery appears to be influenced by baseline health or functional status and severity of illness. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal research is needed to understand how children recover after a critical illness. Our results suggest factors that may influence the recovery trajectory and were used to inform the methodology, outcomes of interest, and appropriate sample size of a larger multicenter study evaluating functional recovery in this population.
Authors: Nora Fayed; Olaf Kraus de Camargo; Inam Elahi; Ankita Dubey; Ricardo M Fernandes; Amy Houtrow; Eyal Cohen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-09-13 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Florence T Bourgeois; Srinivas Murthy; Catia Pinto; Karen L Olson; John P A Ioannidis; Kenneth D Mandl Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-07-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mary A Khetani; James E Graham; Patricia L Davies; Mary C Law; Rune J Simeonsson Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Dana Anaby; Mary Law; Wendy Coster; Gary Bedell; Mary Khetani; Lisa Avery; Rachel Teplicky Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jeffrey D Edwards; Amy J Houtrow; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Roberta S Rehm; Barry P Markovitz; Robert J Graham; R Adams Dudley Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Mark J Peters; Andrew Argent; Marino Festa; Stéphane Leteurtre; Jefferson Piva; Ann Thompson; Douglas Willson; Pierre Tissières; Marisa Tucci; Jacques Lacroix Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Tellen D Bennett; Rebecca R Dixon; Cory Kartchner; Peter E DeWitt; Yamila Sierra; Diane Ladell; Allison Kempe; Desmond K Runyan; J Michael Dean; Heather T Keenan Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Liang R Cui; Megan LaPorte; Matthew Civitello; Meg Stanger; Maxine Orringer; Frank Casey; Bradley A Kuch; Sue R Beers; Cynthia A Valenta; Patrick M Kochanek; Amy J Houtrow; Ericka L Fink Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Janos Cambiaso-Daniel; Ioannis Malagaris; Eric Rivas; Gabriel Hundeshagen; Charles D Voigt; Elizabeth Blears; Ron P Mlcak; David N Herndon; Celeste C Finnerty; Oscar E Suman Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.624