Literature DB >> 24026218

Posterior acetabular arc angle of unstable posterior hip fracture-dislocation.

Thos Harnroongroj1, Kongkhet Riansuwan, Narumol Sudjai, Thossart Harnroongroj.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Posterior hip fracture-dislocation needs stability evaluation. A previous study in the normal acetabulum has shown that the coronal posterior acetabular arc angle (PAAA) could be used to assess an unstable posterior hip fracture. Our study was designed to assess PAAA of unstable posterior hip fracture-dislocation and whether posterior acetabular wall fracture involves the superior acetabular dome.
METHODS: Using coronal computed tomography (CT) of the acetabulum and 3D reconstruction of the lateral pelvis, we measured coronal, vertical PAAA and posterior acetabular wall depth of 21 unstable posterior hip fracture-dislocations and of 50% normal contralateral acetabula. Posterior acetabular wall fracture was assessed to determine whether the fracture involved the superior acetabular dome and then defined as a high or low wall fracture using vertical PAAA in reference to the centroacetabulo-greater sciatic notch line.
RESULTS: The coronal PAAA of unstable posterior hip fracture-dislocations and of 50% of the posterior acetabular wall of normal the contralateral acetabulum were 54.48° (9.09°) and 57.43° (5.88°) and corresponded to 15.06 (4.39) and 15.61 (2.01) mm of the posterior acetabular wall without significant difference (p > 0.05). The vertical PAAA of unstable posterior hip fracture-dislocation was 101.67° (20.44°). There were 16 high posterior acetabular wall fractures with 35.00 (16.18) vertical PAAA involving the acetabular dome and 5 low wall fractures. High posterior wall fractures resulted in four avascular necroses of the femoral head, three sciatic nerve injuries and one osteoarthritic hip.
CONCLUSION: Coronal and vertical PAAA of unstable posterior hip fracture-dislocations were 54.48° and 101.67°. Vertical PAAA assesses high or low posterior acetabular wall fracture by referring to the centroacetabulo-greater sciatic notch line. High posterior wall fracture seems to be the most frequent and is involved with many complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24026218      PMCID: PMC3843213          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2090-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  7 in total

Review 1.  Displaced acetabular fractures: indications for operative and nonoperative management.

Authors:  P Tornetta
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Posterior acetabular fracture-dislocations: fragment size, joint capsule, and stability.

Authors:  J C Vailas; S Hurwitz; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1989-11

3.  Computed tomography evaluation of stability in posterior fracture dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  M S Calkins; G Zych; L Latta; F J Borja; W Mnaymneh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Outcomes of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum treated nonoperatively after diagnostic screening with dynamic stress examination under anesthesia.

Authors:  Charles S Grimshaw; Berton R Moed
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Posterior acetabular arc angle of the femoral head assesses instability of posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  Thossart Harnroongroj; Purinon Suangyanon; Theerawoot Tharmviboonsri; Thos Harnroongroj
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Computed tomography as a predictor of hip stability status in posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Berton R Moed; David A Ajibade; Heidi Israel
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Stability of posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip. Quantitative assessment using computed tomography.

Authors:  J E Keith; H R Brashear; W B Guilford
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.284

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Acetabular roof arc angles and anatomic biomechanical superior acetabular weight bearing area.

Authors:  Thossart Harnroongroj; Montri Wattanakaewsripetch; Narumol Sudjai; Thos Harnroongroj
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 2.  Sciatic nerve injury after acetabular fractures: a meta-analysis of incidence and outcomes.

Authors:  Ioannis M Stavrakakis; Evangelos I Kritsotakis; Peter V Giannoudis; Petros Kapsetakis; Rozalia Dimitriou; Johannes D Bastian; Theodoros H Tosounidis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  [Application of self-made spring plate for treatment of acetabular posterior wall fractures].

Authors:  Weijun An; Jianbin Sun; Zhizhong Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-01-15

4.  Midterm results of digastric trochanteric flip osteotomy for high acetabular posterior wall fracture.

Authors:  Yuneng Li; Yufeng Ge; Haonan Liu; Shiwen Zhu; Xinbao Wu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  Roof arc width: The novel calculation method for calculation of patient specific roof arc width in acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Darshil Shah; Lokesh Gudda Naik; Prashant Pawar; Pathik Shah; Vaibhav Bagaria
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.