Literature DB >> 25298555

Acetabular roof arc angles and anatomic biomechanical superior acetabular weight bearing area.

Thossart Harnroongroj1, Montri Wattanakaewsripetch1, Narumol Sudjai1, Thos Harnroongroj1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acetabular fracture involves whether superior articular weight bearing area and stability of the hip are assessed by acetabular roof arc angles comprising medial, anterior and posterior. Many previous studies, based on clinical, biomechanics and anatomic superior articular surface of acetabulum showed different degrees of the angles. Anatomic biomechanical superior acetabular weight bearing area (ABSAWBA) of the femoral head can be identified as radiographic subchondral bone density at superior acetabular dome. The fracture passes through ABSAWBA creating traumatic hip arthritis. Therefore, acetabular roof arc angles of ABSAWBA were studied in order to find out that the most appropriate degrees of recommended acetabular roof arc angles in the previous studies had no ABSAWBA involvement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: ABSAWBA of femoral head was identified 68 acetabular fractures and 13 isolated pelvic fractures without unstable pelvic ring injury were enrolled. Acetabular roof arc angle was measured on anteroposterior, obturator and iliac oblique view radiographs of normal contralateral acetabulum using programmatic automation controller digital system and measurement tools.
RESULTS: Average medial, anterior and posterior acetabular roof arc angles of the ABSAWBA of 94 normal acetabulum were 39.09 (7.41), 42.49 (8.15) and 55.26 (10.08) degrees, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Less than 39°, 42° and 55° of medial, anterior and posterior acetabular roof arc angles involve ABSAWBA of the femoral head. Application of the study results showed that 45°, 45° and 62° from the previous studies are the most appropriate medial, anterior and posterior acetabular roof arc angles without involvement of the ABSAWBA respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular radiographs; Acetabulum; acetabular roof arc angles; anatomic biomechanicalsuperior acetabular weight bearing area; biomechanics; fractures; radiography

Year:  2014        PMID: 25298555      PMCID: PMC4175862          DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.139858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  8 in total

1.  Posterior acetabular arc angle of unstable posterior hip fracture-dislocation.

Authors:  Thos Harnroongroj; Kongkhet Riansuwan; Narumol Sudjai; Thossart Harnroongroj
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Displaced acetabular fractures.

Authors:  J M Matta; P O Merritt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A Wolff in sheep's clothing: trabecular bone adaptation in response to changes in joint loading orientation.

Authors:  Meir M Barak; Daniel E Lieberman; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Posterior acetabular arc angle of the femoral head assesses instability of posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  Thossart Harnroongroj; Purinon Suangyanon; Theerawoot Tharmviboonsri; Thos Harnroongroj
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The effects of simulated transverse, anterior column, and posterior column fractures of the acetabulum on the stability of the hip joint.

Authors:  M S Vrahas; K K Widding; K A Thomas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Roof-arc angle and weight-bearing area of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong; Pornsawat Suwanwong; Thossart Harnroongroj
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  J M Matta; L M Anderson; H C Epstein; P Hendricks
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Conservatively treated acetabular fractures: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Narender Kumar Magu; Rajesh Rohilla; Sanjay Arora
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.251

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Quadrilateral plate fractures of the acetabulum: Classification, approach, implant therapy and related research progress.

Authors:  Xue-Feng Zhou; Si-Chao Gu; Wan-Bo Zhu; Jia-Zhao Yang; Lei Xu; Shi-Yuan Fang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Minimally invasive surgical treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures does not improve pain, mobility or quality of life compared to conservative treatment: a matched-pair analysis of 50 patients.

Authors:  Benedict Swartman; Johanna Pelzer; Sven Yves Vetter; Nils Beisemann; Marc Schnetzke; Holger Keil; Paul Alfred Gruetzner; Jochen Franke
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.