Literature DB >> 23546512

Posterior acetabular arc angle of the femoral head assesses instability of posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip.

Thossart Harnroongroj1, Purinon Suangyanon, Theerawoot Tharmviboonsri, Thos Harnroongroj.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Unstable posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip is determined by the wall defect or acetabular fracture index. The unstable hip is a result of inadequate posterior acetabular coverage of the femoral head from the posterior acetabular wall fracture. In order to measure total posterior acetabular coverage of the femoral head and avoid using the contralateral acetabulum as a calculation reference, the posterior acetabular arc angle of the femoral head was measured to assess stability of posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip.
METHODS: Using coronal computed tomography (CT) scan of the normal contralateral acetabulum at the level of the widest acetabular diameter and thinnest medial wall of 60 acetabular fractures, posterior acetabular arc angles of the femoral head in intact, 20 % and 50 % defects of posterior acetabular walls were measured. The angles were measured from the acetabular centre to the thinnest medial wall and to the top, inner cortex of 80 % and 50 % posterior acetabular walls.
RESULTS: Average intact, 80 % and 50 % posterior acetabular walls were 33.82 ± 4.30, 26.88 ± 3.33 and 16.91 ± 2.15 mm which corresponded to 92.25 ± 11.34, 77.42 ± 10.04 and 50.63 ± 6.58° of posterior acetabular arc angles of the femoral head. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the measurements including correlation of conversion of posterior acetabular wall depths to posterior acetabular arc angles of the femoral head were more than 0.82 and 0.89.
CONCLUSIONS: The measurement technique of posterior acetabular arc angle of the femoral head has strong reliability. Therefore, stable or unstable posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip can be determined in terms of more than 77 degrees or less than 50 degrees of posterior acetabular arc angles of the femoral head instead of less than 20 % or more than 50 % posterior acetabular wall defect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23546512      PMCID: PMC3664170          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1870-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  5 in total

1.  Displaced acetabular fractures.

Authors:  J M Matta; P O Merritt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Posterior acetabular fracture-dislocations: fragment size, joint capsule, and stability.

Authors:  J C Vailas; S Hurwitz; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1989-11

3.  Computed tomography evaluation of stability in posterior fracture dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  M S Calkins; G Zych; L Latta; F J Borja; W Mnaymneh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Computed tomography as a predictor of hip stability status in posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Berton R Moed; David A Ajibade; Heidi Israel
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Stability of posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip. Quantitative assessment using computed tomography.

Authors:  J E Keith; H R Brashear; W B Guilford
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.284

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Posterior acetabular arc angle of unstable posterior hip fracture-dislocation.

Authors:  Thos Harnroongroj; Kongkhet Riansuwan; Narumol Sudjai; Thossart Harnroongroj
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Acetabular roof arc angles and anatomic biomechanical superior acetabular weight bearing area.

Authors:  Thossart Harnroongroj; Montri Wattanakaewsripetch; Narumol Sudjai; Thos Harnroongroj
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  [Arthroscopic treatment of irreducible hip posterior dislocation caused by acetabular labrum bony Bankart lesions].

Authors:  Daohong Zhao; Weiping Hu; Bo Zhao; Xinghai Zhao; Yan Li; Jun Zhang; Hong Chen; Zhidan Wu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-06-15

4.  Effects of the acetabular fracture index and other factors of posterior wall acetabular fracture on functional outcome.

Authors:  Hai-Tao Long; Zhen-Han Deng; Min Zou; Zhang-Yuan Lin; Jian-Xi Zhu; Yong Zhu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  A Preliminary Cadaveric MRI Study of Fetal Hip Development.

Authors:  Zhenqing Liu; Huixian Li; Shuai Wang; Qianqian Wu; Hongsheng Liu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-14

6.  Morphological Characteristics of the Posterior Wall Associated with Complex Acetabular Fractures: A Radiological Study Using 3D Software and Fracture Mapping Technique.

Authors:  Siyu Tian; Shaobo Liang; Zhongzheng Wang; Pengyu Ye; Yingchao Yin; Junran Li; Ruipeng Zhang; Kuo Zhao; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Roof arc width: The novel calculation method for calculation of patient specific roof arc width in acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Darshil Shah; Lokesh Gudda Naik; Prashant Pawar; Pathik Shah; Vaibhav Bagaria
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-09

8.  Morphological Characteristics of Posterior Wall Fragments Associated with Acetabular Both-column Fracture.

Authors:  Siyu Tian; Yajie Chen; Yingchao Yin; Ruipeng Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.