Literature DB >> 21123609

Outcomes of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum treated nonoperatively after diagnostic screening with dynamic stress examination under anesthesia.

Charles S Grimshaw1, Berton R Moed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dynamic stress fluoroscopy with the patient under general anesthesia has been advocated as a clinical measure of hip stability and congruity in patients with a posterior wall acetabular fracture. The purpose of this study was to establish the predictive value of the dynamic stress fluoroscopic examination for these fractures by evaluating clinical and radiographic outcomes after nonoperative treatment of fractures found to be stable with this examination.
METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with an acute posterior wall fracture of the acetabulum who were shown to have a stable hip joint by dynamic stress fluoroscopy while they were under general anesthesia were treated nonoperatively. At the time of follow-up, the patients underwent clinical and/or radiographic evaluation.
RESULTS: Clinical follow-up was performed for eighteen patients at a minimum of two years after injury, at which time the average modified Merle d'Aubigné score was very good, with no one having less than a good clinical outcome. Fifteen of these eighteen patients had radiographic evaluation at a minimum of two years, and all were found to have a congruent joint with a normal joint space and no evidence of posttraumatic arthritis.
CONCLUSIONS: Hip joint stability determined with dynamic stress fluoroscopy with the patient under general anesthesia after a posterior wall acetabular fracture is predictive of hip joint congruity, an excellent radiographic outcome, and a good-to-excellent early clinical outcome after nonoperative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21123609     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  Can computed tomography predict hip stability in posterior wall acetabular fractures?

Authors:  Jeffrey M Reagan; Berton R Moed
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Posterior acetabular arc angle of unstable posterior hip fracture-dislocation.

Authors:  Thos Harnroongroj; Kongkhet Riansuwan; Narumol Sudjai; Thossart Harnroongroj
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Classifications in brief: Letournel classification for acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Timothy B Alton; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Morphological Characteristics of the Posterior Wall Associated with Complex Acetabular Fractures: A Radiological Study Using 3D Software and Fracture Mapping Technique.

Authors:  Siyu Tian; Shaobo Liang; Zhongzheng Wang; Pengyu Ye; Yingchao Yin; Junran Li; Ruipeng Zhang; Kuo Zhao; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Long-term total hip arthroplasty rates in patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures after surgery: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Tzu-Chun Chung; Tzu-Shan Chen; Yao-Chun Hsu; Feng-Chen Kao; Yuan-Kun Tu; Pao-Hsin Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Morphological Characteristics of Posterior Wall Fragments Associated with Acetabular Both-column Fracture.

Authors:  Siyu Tian; Yajie Chen; Yingchao Yin; Ruipeng Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.