Literature DB >> 24023381

Gender categorization in cochlear implant users.

Zoé Massida1, Mathieu Marx, Pascal Belin, Christopher James, Bernard Fraysse, Pascal Barone, Olivier Deguine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, the authors examined the ability of subjects with cochlear implants (CIs) to discriminate voice gender and how this ability evolved as a function of CI experience.
METHOD: The authors presented a continuum of voice samples created by voice morphing, with 9 intermediate acoustic parameter steps between a typical male and a typical female. This method allowed for the evaluation of gender categorization not only when acoustical features were specific to gender but also for more ambiguous cases, when fundamental frequency or formant distribution were located between typical values.
RESULTS: Results showed a global, though variable, deficit for voice gender categorization in CI recipients compared with subjects with normal hearing. This deficit was stronger for ambiguous stimuli in the voice continuum: Average performance scores for CI users were 58% lower than average scores for subjects with normal hearing in cases of ambiguous stimuli and 19% lower for typical male and female voices. The authors found no significant improvement in voice gender categorization with CI experience.
CONCLUSIONS: These results emphasize the dissociation between recovery of speech recognition and voice feature perception after cochlear implantation. This large and durable deficit may be related to spectral and temporal degradation induced by CI sound coding, or it may be related to central voice processing deficits.

Keywords:  cochlear implants; deafness; gender; speech perception; voice; voice processing

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24023381     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0132)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation and analysis of whispered speech for cochlear implant users: Gender identification and intelligibility.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Hussnain Ali; John H L Hansen; Emily Tobey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Jessica R Sullivan; Peter F Assmann; Shaikat Hossain; Erin C Schafer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; Etienne Gaudrain; Jeanne N Clarke; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-30

4.  [Speaker discrimination in cochlear implant users].

Authors:  R Mühler; M Ziese; J L Verhey
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-08

6.  Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Damir Kovačić; Chris J James
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-02

7.  Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing.

Authors:  Miryam Calvino; Javier Gavilán; Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado; Rosa M Pérez-Mora; Elena Muñoz; Jesús Díez-Sebastián; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre to the Perception of Vocal Emotions in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Celina I von Eiff; Verena G Skuk; Romi Zäske; Christine Nussbaum; Sascha Frühholz; Ute Feuer; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Are There Real-world Benefits to Bimodal Listening?

Authors:  Sarah Nyirjesy; Cole Rodman; Terrin N Tamati; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.619

10.  Can you hear my age? Influences of speech rate and speech spontaneity on estimation of speaker age.

Authors:  Sara Skoog Waller; Mårten Eriksson; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.