Literature DB >> 24019464

Decisions on the fly in cellular sensory systems.

Eric D Siggia1, Massimo Vergassola.   

Abstract

Cells send and receive signals through pathways that have been defined in great detail biochemically, and it is often presumed that the signals convey only level information. Cell signaling in the presence of noise is extensively studied but only rarely is the speed required to make a decision considered. However, in the immune system, rapidly developing embryos, and cellular response to stress, fast and accurate actions are required. Statistical theory under the rubric of "exploit-explore" quantifies trade-offs between decision speed and accuracy and supplies rigorous performance bounds and algorithms that realize them. We show that common protein phosphorylation networks can implement optimal decision theory algorithms and speculate that the ubiquitous chemical modifications to receptors during signaling actually perform analog computations. We quantify performance trade-offs when the cellular system has incomplete knowledge of the data model. For the problem of sensing the time when the composition of a ligand mixture changes, we find a nonanalytic dependence on relative concentrations and specify the number of parameters needed for near-optimal performance and how to adjust them. The algorithms specify the minimal computation that has to take place on a single receptor before the information is pooled across the cell.

Keywords:  sequential probability ratio test; signal transduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24019464      PMCID: PMC3785727          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314081110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

Review 1.  Signal transduction and the control of gene expression.

Authors:  Ali H Brivanlou; James E Darnell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Implementation of dynamic Bayesian decision making by intracellular kinetics.

Authors:  Tetsuya J Kobayashi
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 3.  Seeing at a glance, smelling in a whiff: rapid forms of perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Naoshige Uchida; Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks.

Authors:  Rafal Bogacz; Eric Brown; Jeff Moehlis; Philip Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Dynamics of intracellular information decoding.

Authors:  Tetsuya J Kobayashi; Atsushi Kamimura
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Physics of chemoreception.

Authors:  H C Berg; E M Purcell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Yeast dynamically modify their environment to achieve better mating efficiency.

Authors:  Meng Jin; Beverly Errede; Marcelo Behar; Will Mather; Sujata Nayak; Jeff Hasty; Henrik G Dohlman; Timothy C Elston
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 8.192

8.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems.

Authors:  A Goldbeter; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Understanding the temporal codes of intra-cellular signals.

Authors:  Marcelo Behar; Alexander Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 5.578

10.  Modeling T cell antigen discrimination based on feedback control of digital ERK responses.

Authors:  Grégoire Altan-Bonnet; Ronald N Germain
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  10 in total

1.  Chemodetection in fluctuating environments: receptor coupling, buffering, and antagonism.

Authors:  Jean-Benoît Lalanne; Paul François
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stochastic feeding dynamics arise from the need for information and energy.

Authors:  Monika Scholz; Aaron R Dinner; Erel Levine; David Biron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A mechanism for hunchback promoters to readout morphogenetic positional information in less than a minute.

Authors:  Jonathan Desponds; Massimo Vergassola; Aleksandra M Walczak
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Biophysical clocks face a trade-off between internal and external noise resistance.

Authors:  Weerapat Pittayakanchit; Zhiyue Lu; Justin Chew; Michael J Rust; Arvind Murugan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Measuring time during early embryonic development.

Authors:  Patrick L Ferree; Victoria E Deneke; Stefano Di Talia
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 6.  Collective gradient sensing and chemotaxis: modeling and recent developments.

Authors:  Brian A Camley
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.333

7.  Simple biochemical networks allow accurate sensing of multiple ligands with a single receptor.

Authors:  Vijay Singh; Ilya Nemenman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  How a well-adapting immune system remembers.

Authors:  Andreas Mayer; Vijay Balasubramanian; Aleksandra M Walczak; Thierry Mora
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Know the Single-Receptor Sensing Limit? Think Again.

Authors:  Gerardo Aquino; Ned S Wingreen; Robert G Endres
Journal:  J Stat Phys       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Distributing tasks via multiple input pathways increases cellular survival in stress.

Authors:  Alejandro A Granados; Matthew M Crane; Luis F Montano-Gutierrez; Reiko J Tanaka; Margaritis Voliotis; Peter S Swain
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.