Literature DB >> 28802256

Stochastic feeding dynamics arise from the need for information and energy.

Monika Scholz1,2, Aaron R Dinner1,2,3, Erel Levine4,5, David Biron1,2.   

Abstract

Animals regulate their food intake in response to the available level of food. Recent observations of feeding dynamics in small animals showed feeding patterns of bursts and pauses, but their function is unknown. Here, we present a data-driven decision-theoretical model of feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans Our central assumption is that food intake serves a dual purpose: to gather information about the external food level and to ingest food when the conditions are good. The model recapitulates experimentally observed feeding patterns. It naturally implements trade-offs between speed versus accuracy and exploration versus exploitation in responding to a dynamic environment. We find that the model predicts three distinct regimes in responding to a dynamical environment, with a transition region where animals respond stochastically to periodic signals. This stochastic response accounts for previously unexplained experimental data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision theory; feeding behavior; sequential analysis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28802256      PMCID: PMC5584422          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703958114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

Review 1.  Food intake and the regulation of body weight.

Authors:  S C Woods; M W Schwartz; D G Baskin; R J Seeley
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  'Infotaxis' as a strategy for searching without gradients.

Authors:  Massimo Vergassola; Emmanuel Villermaux; Boris I Shraiman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Peter Skorupski; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Decisions on the fly in cellular sensory systems.

Authors:  Eric D Siggia; Massimo Vergassola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Bacterial strategies for chemotaxis response.

Authors:  Antonio Celani; Massimo Vergassola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs.

Authors:  K S McCann; J B Rasmussen; J Umbanhowar
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  An approximately Bayesian delta-rule model explains the dynamics of belief updating in a changing environment.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Robert C Wilson; Benjamin Heasly; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Two size-selective mechanisms specifically trap bacteria-sized food particles in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Christopher Fang-Yen; Leon Avery; Aravinthan D T Samuel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Recognition of familiar food activates feeding via an endocrine serotonin signal in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Bo-Mi Song; Serge Faumont; Shawn Lockery; Leon Avery
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Automated monitoring and quantitative analysis of feeding behaviour in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pavel M Itskov; José-Maria Moreira; Ekaterina Vinnik; Gonçalo Lopes; Steve Safarik; Michael H Dickinson; Carlos Ribeiro
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of solitary and collective foraging strategies of Caenorhabditis elegans in patchy food distributions.

Authors:  Siyu Serena Ding; Leah S Muhle; André E X Brown; Linus J Schumacher; Robert G Endres
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A Microfluidic Platform for Longitudinal Imaging in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Kyung Suk Lee; Erel Levine
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Modelling learning in Caenorhabditis elegans chemosensory and locomotive circuitry for T-maze navigation.

Authors:  Bennet G Sakelaris; Zongyu Li; Jiawei Sun; Shurjo Banerjee; Victoria Booth; Eleni Gourgou
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.698

4.  Foraging as an evidence accumulation process.

Authors:  Jacob D Davidson; Ahmed El Hady
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Automatically tracking feeding behavior in populations of foraging C. elegans.

Authors:  Elsa Bonnard; Jun Liu; Nicolina Zjacic; Luis Alvarez; Monika Scholz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 8.713

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.