OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of three-dimensional semi-automated evaluation software for the assessment of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and blood volume (MBV) at dynamic myocardial perfusion computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Volume-based software relying on marginal space learning and probabilistic boosting tree-based contour fitting was applied to CT myocardial perfusion imaging data of 37 subjects. In addition, all image data were analysed manually and both approaches were compared with SPECT findings. Study endpoints included time of analysis and conventional measures of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Of 592 analysable segments, 42 showed perfusion defects on SPECT. Average analysis times for the manual and software-based approaches were 49.1 ± 11.2 and 16.5 ± 3.7 min respectively (P < 0.01). There was strong agreement between the two measures of interest (MBF, ICC = 0.91, and MBV, ICC = 0.88, both P < 0.01) and no significant difference in MBF/MBV with respect to diagnostic accuracy between the two approaches for both MBF and MBV for manual versus software-based approach; respectively; all comparisons P > 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional semi-automated evaluation of dynamic myocardial perfusion CT data provides similar measures and diagnostic accuracy to manual evaluation, albeit with substantially reduced analysis times. This capability may aid the integration of this test into clinical workflows. KEY POINTS: • Myocardial perfusion CT is attractive for comprehensive coronary heart disease assessment. • Traditional image analysis methods are cumbersome and time-consuming. • Automated 3D perfusion software shortens analysis times. • Automated 3D perfusion software increases standardisation of myocardial perfusion CT. • Automated, standardised analysis fosters myocardial perfusion CT integration into clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of three-dimensional semi-automated evaluation software for the assessment of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and blood volume (MBV) at dynamic myocardial perfusion computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Volume-based software relying on marginal space learning and probabilistic boosting tree-based contour fitting was applied to CT myocardial perfusion imaging data of 37 subjects. In addition, all image data were analysed manually and both approaches were compared with SPECT findings. Study endpoints included time of analysis and conventional measures of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Of 592 analysable segments, 42 showed perfusion defects on SPECT. Average analysis times for the manual and software-based approaches were 49.1 ± 11.2 and 16.5 ± 3.7 min respectively (P < 0.01). There was strong agreement between the two measures of interest (MBF, ICC = 0.91, and MBV, ICC = 0.88, both P < 0.01) and no significant difference in MBF/MBV with respect to diagnostic accuracy between the two approaches for both MBF and MBV for manual versus software-based approach; respectively; all comparisons P > 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional semi-automated evaluation of dynamic myocardial perfusion CT data provides similar measures and diagnostic accuracy to manual evaluation, albeit with substantially reduced analysis times. This capability may aid the integration of this test into clinical workflows. KEY POINTS: • Myocardial perfusion CT is attractive for comprehensive coronary heart disease assessment. • Traditional image analysis methods are cumbersome and time-consuming. • Automated 3D perfusion software shortens analysis times. • Automated 3D perfusion software increases standardisation of myocardial perfusion CT. • Automated, standardised analysis fosters myocardial perfusion CT integration into clinical practice.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Fabian Bamberg; Alexander Becker; Florian Schwarz; Roy P Marcus; Martin Greif; Franz von Ziegler; Ron Blankstein; Udo Hoffmann; Wieland H Sommer; Verena S Hoffmann; Thorsten R C Johnson; Hans-Christoph R Becker; Bernd J Wintersperger; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jose A Rocha-Filho; Ron Blankstein; Leonid D Shturman; Hiram G Bezerra; David R Okada; Ian S Rogers; Brian Ghoshhajra; Udo Hoffmann; Gudrun Feuchtner; Wilfred S Mamuya; Thomas J Brady; Ricardo C Cury Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; John D Friedman; James A Case; Jan R Bryngelson; Ginger K Hertenstein; Kelly L Moutray; Kimberly Reid; S James Cullom Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Richard T George; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Julie M Miller; Kakuya Kitagawa; Hyuk-Jae Chang; David A Bluemke; Lewis Becker; Omair Yousuf; John Texter; Albert C Lardo; João A C Lima Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Ron Blankstein; Leon D Shturman; Ian S Rogers; Jose A Rocha-Filho; David R Okada; Ammar Sarwar; Anand V Soni; Hiram Bezerra; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Milena Petranovic; Ricardo Loureiro; Gudrun Feuchtner; Henry Gewirtz; Udo Hoffmann; Wilfred S Mamuya; Thomas J Brady; Ricardo C Cury Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andreas M Bucher; Julian L Wichmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Christopher D Wolla; Christian Canstein; Andrew D McQuiston; Aleksander W Krazinski; Carlo N De Cecco; Felix G Meinel; Thomas J Vogl; Lucas L Geyer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stefan Baumann; Rui Wang; U Joseph Schoepf; Daniel H Steinberg; James V Spearman; Richard R Bayer; Christian W Hamm; Matthias Renker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: S Feger; A Shaban; S Lukas; C Kendziorra; M Rief; E Zimmermann; M Dewey Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: A M Bucher; C N De Cecco; U J Schoepf; R Wang; F G Meinel; S R Binukrishnan; J V Spearman; T J Vogl; B Ruzsics Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Sara Seitun; Alberto Clemente; Ludovico La Grutta; Patrizia Toia; Giuseppe Runza; Massimo Midiri; Erica Maffei Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2017-04