Literature DB >> 24009995

Influence of sampling window size and orientation on parafoveal cone packing density.

Marco Lombardo1, Sebastiano Serrao, Pietro Ducoli, Giuseppe Lombardo.   

Abstract

We assessed the agreement between sampling windows of different size and orientation on packing density estimates in images of the parafoveal cone mosaic acquired using a flood-illumination adaptive optics retinal camera. Horizontal and vertical oriented sampling windows of different size (320x160 µm, 160x80 µm and 80x40 µm) were selected in two retinal locations along the horizontal meridian in one eye of ten subjects. At each location, cone density tended to decline with decreasing sampling area. Although the differences in cone density estimates were not statistically significant, Bland-Altman plots showed that the agreement between cone density estimated within the different sampling window conditions was moderate. The percentage of the preferred packing arrangements of cones by Voronoi tiles was slightly affected by window size and orientation. The results illustrated the high importance of specifying the size and orientation of the sampling window used to derive cone metric estimates to facilitate comparison of different studies.

Keywords:  (110.1080) Active or adaptive optics; (110.3925) Metrics; (170.1610) Clinical applications

Year:  2013        PMID: 24009995      PMCID: PMC3756574          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.4.001318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  36 in total

1.  Iso-orientation areas in the foveal cone mosaic.

Authors:  D Pum; P K Ahnelt; M Grasl
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  The density recovery profile: a method for the analysis of points in the plane applicable to retinal studies.

Authors:  R W Rodieck
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Interocular symmetry of parafoveal photoreceptor cone density distribution.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Giuseppe Lombardo; Domenico Schiano Lomoriello; Pietro Ducoli; Mario Stirpe; Sebastiano Serrao
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Non-linear projection of the retinal image in a wide-angle schematic eye.

Authors:  N Drasdo; C W Fowler
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  In vivo imaging of photoreceptor disruption associated with age-related macular degeneration: A pilot study.

Authors:  Adam Boretsky; Faraz Khan; Garrett Burnett; Daniel X Hammer; R Daniel Ferguson; Frederik van Kuijk; Massoud Motamedi
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 7.  Adaptive optics technology for high-resolution retinal imaging.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Nicholas Devaney; Mariacristina Parravano; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Voronoi analysis uncovers relationship between mosaics of normally placed and displaced amacrine cells in the thraira retina.

Authors:  Luciano Da Fontoura Costa; Daniela Maria Oliveira Bonci; Cézar Akiyoshi Saito; Fernando Allan De Farias Rocha; Luiz Carlos De Lima Silveira; Dora Fix Ventura
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2007

9.  Variability in parafoveal cone mosaic in normal trichromatic individuals.

Authors:  Elise W Dees; Alfredo Dubra; Rigmor C Baraas
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Noninvasive imaging of the human rod photoreceptor mosaic using a confocal adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Alfredo Dubra; Yusufu Sulai; Jennifer L Norris; Robert F Cooper; Adam M Dubis; David R Williams; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  15 in total

1.  Semi-automated identification of cones in the human retina using circle Hough transform.

Authors:  Danuta M Bukowska; Avenell L Chew; Emily Huynh; Irwin Kashani; Sue Ling Wan; Pak Ming Wan; Fred K Chen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Assessment of Different Sampling Methods for Measuring and Representing Macular Cone Density Using Flood-Illuminated Adaptive Optics.

Authors:  Shu Feng; Michael J Gale; Jonathan D Fay; Ambar Faridi; Hope E Titus; Anupam K Garg; Keith V Michaels; Laura R Erker; Dawn Peters; Travis B Smith; Mark E Pennesi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Advances in understanding the molecular basis of the first steps in color vision.

Authors:  Lukas Hofmann; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  Methods for investigating the local spatial anisotropy and the preferred orientation of cones in adaptive optics retinal images.

Authors:  Robert F Cooper; Marco Lombardo; Joseph Carroll; Kenneth R Sloan; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Use of focus measure operators for characterization of flood illumination adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy image quality.

Authors:  David Alonso-Caneiro; Danuta M Sampson; Avenell L Chew; Michael J Collins; Fred K Chen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Intergrader agreement of foveal cone topography measured using adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Niamh Wynne; Jenna A Cava; Mina Gaffney; Heather Heitkotter; Abigail Scheidt; Jenny L Reiniger; Jenna Grieshop; Kai Yang; Wolf M Harmening; Robert F Cooper; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  High-resolution imaging of photoreceptors in healthy human eyes using an adaptive optics retinal camera.

Authors:  P Tumahai; C Moureaux; M Meillat; G Debellemanière; M Flores; B Delbosc; M Saleh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  The Reliability of Cone Density Measurements in the Presence of Rods.

Authors:  Jessica I W Morgan; Grace K Vergilio; Jessica Hsu; Alfredo Dubra; Robert F Cooper
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Structural and Function Correlation of Cone Packing Utilizing Adaptive Optics and Microperimetry.

Authors:  Dabir Supriya; Mangalesh Shwetha; Kumar Kiran Anupama; Kurian Kummelil Mathew; Tos T J M Berendschot; Jan S A G Schouten; Roopa Bharamshetter; Yadav K Naresh; Shetty Rohit; Bharath Hegde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Technical factors influencing cone packing density estimates in adaptive optics flood illuminated retinal images.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.