Literature DB >> 36032569

Intergrader agreement of foveal cone topography measured using adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy.

Niamh Wynne1, Jenna A Cava1, Mina Gaffney2, Heather Heitkotter3, Abigail Scheidt1, Jenny L Reiniger4, Jenna Grieshop2, Kai Yang5, Wolf M Harmening4, Robert F Cooper1,2, Joseph Carroll1,2,3.   

Abstract

The foveal cone mosaic can be directly visualized using adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO). Previous studies in individuals with normal vision report wide variability in the topography of the foveal cone mosaic, especially the value of peak cone density (PCD). While these studies often involve a human grader, there have been no studies examining intergrader reproducibility of foveal cone mosaic metrics. Here we re-analyzed published AOSLO foveal cone images from 44 individuals to assess the relationship between the cone density centroid (CDC) location and the location of PCD. Across 5 graders with variable experience, we found a measurement error of 11.7% in PCD estimates and higher intergrader reproducibility of CDC location compared to PCD location (p < 0.0001). These estimates of measurement error can be used in future studies of the foveal cone mosaic, and our results support use of the CDC location as a more reproducible anchor for cross-modality analyses.
© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36032569      PMCID: PMC9408252          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.460821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.562


  41 in total

1.  The locus of fixation and the foveal cone mosaic.

Authors:  Nicole M Putnam; Heidi J Hofer; Nathan Doble; Li Chen; Joseph Carroll; David R Williams
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Influence of sampling window size and orientation on parafoveal cone packing density.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Pietro Ducoli; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Variability in Human Cone Topography Assessed by Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Tianjiao Zhang; Pooja Godara; Ernesto R Blanco; Russell L Griffin; Xiaolin Wang; Christine A Curcio; Yuhua Zhang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Evaluating outer segment length as a surrogate measure of peak foveal cone density.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilk; Brandon M Wilk; Christopher S Langlo; Robert F Cooper; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Imaging the photoreceptor mosaic with adaptive optics: beyond counting cones.

Authors:  Pooja Godara; Melissa Wagner-Schuman; Jungtae Rha; Thomas B Connor; Kimberly E Stepien; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Arrested development: high-resolution imaging of foveal morphology in albinism.

Authors:  John T McAllister; Adam M Dubis; Diane M Tait; Shawn Ostler; Jungtae Rha; Kimberly E Stepien; C Gail Summers; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Imaging single cells in the living retina.

Authors:  David R Williams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Assessing the spatial relationship between fixation and foveal specializations.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilk; Adam M Dubis; Robert F Cooper; Phyllis Summerfelt; Alfredo Dubra; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The Reliability of Cone Density Measurements in the Presence of Rods.

Authors:  Jessica I W Morgan; Grace K Vergilio; Jessica Hsu; Alfredo Dubra; Robert F Cooper
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Distribution of cone density, spacing and arrangement in adult healthy retinas with adaptive optics flood illumination.

Authors:  Richard Legras; Alain Gaudric; Kelly Woog
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.