Literature DB >> 26511119

Late phase II study of robot-assisted gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer.

Masanori Tokunaga1, Rie Makuuchi2, Yuiciro Miki2, Yutaka Tanizawa2, Etsuro Bando2, Taiichi Kawamura2, Masanori Terashima2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of robot-assisted gastrectomy (RG) in terms of safety is unclear due to a lack of prospective studies. We showed feasible surgical outcomes in our previous study. In this phase II study, we assessed feasibility of the procedure by recruiting a larger number of patients.
METHOD: This single-center, prospective phase II study included patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer undergoing RG. The primary end point was the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications, including anastomotic leakage, pancreas-related infection, and intra-abdominal abscess. The secondary end points were overall survival, relapse-free survival, RG completion rate, and incidence of all surgical morbidities.
RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were recruited between December 2012 and April 2015. The incidence of intra-abdominal infectious complications was 3.3 % (95 % CI 0.9-8.3 %), and all complications were successfully treated conservatively without re-operation. The incidence of overall adverse events was 14.2 % (95 % CI 8.5-21.7 %). Three patients required conversion to open gastrectomy according to the protocol due to advancement of disease.
CONCLUSION: Our data show that RG is safe in terms of the incidence and severity of postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; Gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; Robot; da Vinci

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26511119     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4613-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopy-Assisted Pylorus-Preserving Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Dong-Seok Han; Yun-Suhk Suh; Hye Seong Ahn; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Woo-Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Wook Ho Kang; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Osamu Ikeda; Masako Urata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress.

Authors:  Myung-Han Hyun; Chung-Ho Lee; Ye-Ji Kwon; Sung-Il Cho; You-Jin Jang; Dong-Hoon Kim; Jong-Han Kim; Seong-Heum Park; Young-Jae Mok; Sung-Soo Park
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer.

Authors:  B W Eom; H M Yoon; K W Ryu; J H Lee; S J Cho; J Y Lee; C G Kim; I J Choi; J S Lee; M C Kook; J Y Rhee; S R Park; Y W Kim
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hyoung-Il Kim; Sang-Uk Han; Han-Kwang Yang; Young-Woo Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Keun Won Ryu; Joong-Min Park; Ji Yeong An; Min-Chan Kim; Sungsoo Park; Kyo Young Song; Sung Jin Oh; Seong-Ho Kong; Byoung Jo Suh; Dae Hyun Yang; Tae Kyung Ha; Youn Nam Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy.

Authors:  K M Kim; J Y An; H I Kim; J H Cheong; W J Hyung; S H Noh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  The impact of preoperative lymph node size on long-term outcome following curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Norihiko Sugisawa; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure.

Authors:  Taeil Son; Joong Ho Lee; Yoo Min Kim; Hyoung-Il Kim; Sung Hoon Noh; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Akio Kaito; Shizuki Sugita; Masahiro Watanabe; Hideki Sunagawa; Takahiro Kinoshita
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-06-02

2.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Hikage; Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Tomoyuki Irino; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Advantages of a robotic approach compared with laparoscopy gastrectomy for patients with high visceral fat area.

Authors:  Makoto Hikage; Keiichi Fujiya; Yuhei Waki; Satoshi Kamiya; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Akifumi Notsu; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Comparison of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Takeshi Omori; Kazuyoshi Yamamoto; Hisashi Hara; Naoki Shinno; Masaaki Yamamoto; Kohei Fujita; Takashi Kanemura; Tomohira Takeoka; Hirofumi Akita; Hiroshi Wada; Masayoshi Yasui; Chu Matsuda; Junichi Nishimura; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Hiroshi Miyata; Masayuki Ohue; Masato Sakon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Robotic versus laparoscopic Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Bin Zhang; Hendi Maher; Xian-Fa Wang; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Caruso; Alberto Patriti; Franco Roviello; Lorenzo De Franco; Franco Franceschini; Graziano Ceccarelli; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-10

Review 7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Caruso; Franco Franceschini; Alberto Patriti; Franco Roviello; Mario Annecchiarico; Graziano Ceccarelli; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-16

8.  Does three-dimensional surgery affect recurrence patterns in patients with gastric cancer after laparoscopic R0 gastrectomy? Results from a 3-year follow-up phase III trial.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Bin-Bin Xu; Zhi-Fang Zheng; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  The 140 years' journey of gastric cancer surgery: From the two hands of Billroth to the multiple hands of the robot.

Authors:  Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 10.  Pooled analysis of the oncological outcomes in robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Ying Wu; Xiu-Feng Lin; Ping Yang; Wei Li
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.