Literature DB >> 18633638

The benefits of standardizing the operative procedure for the assistant in laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Naoki Hiki1, Testsu Fukunaga, Toshiharu Yamaguchi, Souya Nunobe, Masanori Tokunaga, Shigekazu Ohyama, Yasuyuki Seto, Hidemaro Yoshiba, Kyoko Nohara, Harutaka Inoue, Tetsuichiro Muto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has not yet been widely adopted for the treatment of gastric cancers because of the perceived complexity of the procedure. In addition to the proficiency of the operator, other factors could potentially be optimized to improve postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate a standardized operative procedure for assistants performing LADG.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 114 patients, 64 initially underwent conventional LADG (CLDG) and then 50 underwent standardized procedure (SLDG) in which the role of assistant in LADG was completely established. Parameters compared for the SLDG and CLDG groups were operation time, estimated blood loss, intra- or postoperative complications, preservation of the vagus nerve, and the number of pathologically examined lymph nodes.
RESULTS: The operation time for the SLDG procedure (mean +/- SE, 229 +/- 6 min) was shorter than for the CLDG procedure (261 +/- 8 min; P < 0.002), and the estimated blood loss for SLDG (57 +/- 7 ml) was less than for CLDG (108 +/- 17 ml, P < 0.004). The celiac branch of the vagus nerve was preserved in 73% of SLDG patients compared with 52% of CLDG patients (P < 0.03). More lymph nodes were pathologically examined in SLDG patients (38.3 +/- 1.5) than in CLDG patients (32.5 +/- 1.8, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of the LADG procedure for assistants enabled a shorter operation time, reduced blood loss, a higher rate of vagus nerve preservation, and more accurate lymph node dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18633638     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-008-0374-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  27 in total

1.  Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection: a phase II study following the learning curve.

Authors:  Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Shinichi Miura; Yasuaki Kanyama; Hiroyuki Yokoyama; Norifumi Ohashi; Kenji Hibi; Katsuki Ito; Seiji Akiyama; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Min-Chan Kim; Ki-Han Kim; Hyung-Ho Kim; Ghap-Joong Jung
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Kyuzo Fujii; Kazuhiro Yasuda; Masafumi Inomata; Yosuke Adachi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Laparoscopy for gastric tumors.

Authors:  D Rosin; O Brasesco; R J Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.495

5.  Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Hayashi; T Ochiai; H Shimada; Y Gunji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Lymph node involvement correlation with survival in advanced gastric carcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses.

Authors:  S Shimoyama; M Kaminishi; Y Joujima; T Oohara; C Hamada; W Teshigawara
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Usefulness of three-dimensional, multidetector row CT (virtual gastroscopy and multiplanar reconstruction) in the evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison with conventional endoscopy, EUS, and histopathology.

Authors:  Suryaprakash Bhandari; Chan Sup Shim; Jung Hoon Kim; In Seop Jung; Joo Young Cho; Joon Seong Lee; Moon Sung Lee; Boo Sung Kim
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Laparoscopic gastric surgery in a Japanese institution: analysis of the initial 100 procedures.

Authors:  Shuji Shimizu; Hirokazu Noshiro; Eishi Nagai; Akihiko Uchiyama; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection for early gastric carcinoma: a review of 43 cases.

Authors:  Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Yasushi Kasai; Yasuaki Kanyama; Kenji Hibi; Katsuki Ito; Seiji Akiyama; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  Current status of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in Japan.

Authors:  S Kitano; N Shiraishi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  16 in total

1.  Potentially fatal complications for elderly patients after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Koshi Kumagai; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Xiaohua Jiang; Takeshi Kubota; Susumu Aikou; Shinya Tanimura; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Laparoscopic surgery for synchronous gastric and colorectal cancer: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Naoki Hiki; Tetsu Fukunaga; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Akira Miki; Takashi Akiyoshi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Effectiveness of a team participation training course for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Kinoshita; Eiji Kanehira; Minoru Matsuda; Shinichi Okazumi; Ryoji Katoh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The Hit and Away technique: optimal usage of the ultrasonic scalpel in laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Irino; Naoki Hiki; Manabu Ohashi; Souya Nunobe; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Single incision gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yun-Suhk Suh; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-18

6.  The clinical safety of performing laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer by trainees after sufficient experience in assisting.

Authors:  Souya Nunobe; Naoki Hiki; Shinya Tanimura; Kyoko Nohara; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Double tract reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer is effective in reducing reflux esophagitis and remnant gastritis with duodenal passage preservation.

Authors:  Tsutomu Namikawa; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Takehiro Okabayashi; Takeki Sugimoto; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  [Determination of training costs associated with surgical procedures during specialization as an orthopaedic and trauma surgeon].

Authors:  D Pförringer; B Markgraf; M Weber; F Seidl; M Crönlein; G Friedl; R Hoffmann; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Safety of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer when performed by trainee surgeons with little experience in performing open gastrectomy.

Authors:  Chizu Kameda; Masato Watanabe; Nobuhiro Suehara; Yusuke Watanabe; Kazuyoshi Nishihara; Toru Nakano; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Impact of anatomical position of the pancreas on postoperative complications and drain amylase concentrations after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Koshi Kumagai; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Satoshi Kamiya; Masahiro Tsujiura; Satoshi Ida; Manabu Ohashi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.